Shame/Narcissism/Feminism/Healing

Echo and Narcissus, John William Waterhouse, 1903,
commonly used illustration of how projected grids affect working context to the delusion and disillusionment of involved parties

Disclaimer: For the purposes of this text, specific gender pronouns are used. While it is equally accurate the other way around it is vastly more common in the community to encounter it the way specified here. This use of gender bias is done purposefully, it should become apparent by the end of the text why it is necessary in this context. This said; a core principle of the outline concept is that in most cases, 'it works two ways'. 

Shame/Narcissism/Feminism/Healing

The shame and guilt reflex. 

Trauma becomes behavioral patterns.

She needs to hear somebody say, I am sorry. 
And for her to believe it, to accept it. 

Until then, every relationship she has which can possibly be exploited into the shape required, for the partner to apologize to her. She has transferred the need. It is no longer the original person who needs to apologize for that to her, it is whoever is providing her supply/support. 

The trauma possibly originated in childhood from a parent or a caregiver, or from a significant other eg; spouse. In any case, it is the breaking of trust which is resulted in trauma and developed into personality disorder. 

A significant portion of the population carry versions of this around. People on the narcissistic personality disorder spectrum as a result of trauma, need their partner to apologize to them. So therefore they bully and belittle significant other until that person conforms and plays at the role for their healing. Whether the person has consented to this game or not, it is the closest possible in liminal terms because they are a supply, supportive of the person. 

It does inflict injury on the partner by the process of cajoling and positioning him into a situation where he feels apologetic. This subtle form of abuse is called recontextualisation and usually developed in stages but can occur in one fabricated situation in which the narcissist is moving the goalposts. 

What happens next, as the shame and the consequence, the pattern which is grown from the shame, is projected outwards instead of being faced up to, is it becomes toxic. This is the narcissist internal mechanism, it then becomes the context clouding the relationship. For the narcissist is the purpose of the relationship which is being used as leverage so that they do not have to face the same reflex but can still maneuver around it. That partner is the fall-guy being manipulated for that purpose. In most cases, neither of the partners are aware of it and in many cases because there is so much trauma in the community, both partners are playing at various levels of this. 

For relationship counseling; identifying personal shame and trusting your partner to work through those processes with you, should be something which occurs early on in the relationship preferably before engaging in sex because that further complicates matters although trust relationships being what they are… Are preferable than disposable sex partners. We will need sex that’s a given. It’s only a problem when games are played using sex as leverage.

What happens next is the relationship between the person needing to hear sorry and inflicting that position onto their partner, both fall within roles which are very easily misinterpreted. Smokescreens and distractions veil the underlaying energy structures. 

The partner feels targeted and put out, and recognizes this, is in a confusion of withdrawal for self-preservation with being exploited by routine behavior to respond to the narcissists reward/control system. It is much more complicated and confusing when sex is involved because then it functions on every level of our being and the entanglement is a much more complicated entity to untangle.

The narcissist on the other hand is not receiving the full support and supply required and which they are used to, decides their partner who is not reacting by apologizing, is useless and a waste of the time. 

From both directions, resentment grows. 

One of them decides to leave first, creating a vacuum space of misperception which cannot be healed by communication because there is none, hurt feelings and uncomfortable environment. Usually it is the provider who is the more badly damaged, who chases after the narcissist because, As a result of their independence and self esteem having been ground down completely, the relationship has become a reference on which the victims well-being also balances. 

The narcissist uses this, because after having emotionally ended the relationship, all the effort is coming from the target, trying to fix things while feeling apologetic regardless that they were the provider. 

The police see that chase as being the target is the troublemaker. Empathic Psychologists see that as the target is having a breakdown because of what the narcissist has done to them. Most of the time, relationship breakdowns involve low-level narcissism from both sides. That’s actually quite normal because we’re dealing with humans and not robots.

This situation is exploited by the narcissist who created and projects it, only to exploit it. The narcissist can identify the target as being the abuser, for not supporting them fully in the way they need it, and for harassing them after they cut their losses. 

The narcissists support/supply network encourage the narcissist to avoid the victim who in their collective network is a bad person who must be avoided and punished if possible, for the injury they have caused to the narcissist. 

The source of this injury is her unwillingness to face a shame and he’s not recognizing his role in replaying her past trauma to heal it and the drama which has resulted from it. She does not want to heal it, she does not want to face that and so she involves her intimate partners in the circle around it, creating a black hole into which the part of falls, so that she can label that person as the bad guy to seek her revenge on the original trauma while at the same time not having to face it.

She will repeat the pattern in every relationship she has until somebody says sorry. 

At which point, if she accepts it she will feel superior and healing process can begin. 

Narcissism includes domination, superiority complex, grandiosity and aspiration; a specific social position which she wants to achieve. If it’s not achieved she feels a failure all her miserable life, once she has achieved it she will use that authority to maximize the size of her supply/support network. 

The Societies infrastructural systems support the narcissists ability to achieve such position of authority within it. A mental belief that anybody who does not respect its structure system is a threat to the society, is the reinforcement of the righteousness of narcissistic control. 

Those who can see the whole for what it is, correctly identifies the situation and the necessary steps towards healing the people involved; both the victim of the narcissist and the narcissist who is claiming to be the victim of her victim. In both cases, apologies are needed and needed to be accepted as authentic rather than lines spoken by actors for the sake of convenience. Narcissist rely on face value fakery, they are believable lawyers and expert actors.

Identifying a persons relationship with their own sense of insecurity, inferiority, shame and guilt, is essential for the counselor. The counselor must himself dedicate an unusually large amount of time to analyzing and identifying those factors about himself so as to be able to accurately do so for other people. 

Traditionally we use the word ‘shaman’ for one who does this. Shame-man. The word also means shah as in noble and relates to chi as in energy. In the west the Society refuses to acknowledge shaman to be a real thing. Shaman are counselors and community healers, reminding everybody always to live in balance, to respect the harmony. The society does however except the role of a professional counselor, one who understands psychology and emotional psychology, who fulfills the role within the society of healing trauma.

The cycle is: those abused by narcissist develop narcissistic tendencies which are then exploited by the narcissists. Narcissism is a reflex personality, growing from a traumatic experience. There are covert and overt narcissists. When it replaces a persons authentic and original personality it becomes a social problem for the community. There are varying levels of narcissism, and there are many energy exploitation strategies although they do typically conform to only a handful of types. 

As always, projection of an analysis on to the situation for the purpose of path-working and healing, must integrate that there may be other invisible factors or other systems of analysis which are more accurate to individual cases. 

Despite being the best tool we have, ‘the versus narcissism technique’ context based on identifying shame-reflex, is limited; it involves extremism and fundamentalism, left-brain thinking which narcissists epitomize as reptilian calculus and which are useful in making sense of the world for people who have been emotionally and mentally destabilized by involvement with narcissists. 

Remember, the narcissists favorite trick is to go public about how their victim has been narcissistically abusing them, as soon as the victim recognizes that they are being victimized. The narcissist will become aware their victim is waking up to them even before the victim does. They are usually gone and involving themselves in support groups, blackening the victims name, even before the victim in the mess of a breakdown fully realizes what has just happened to them.

“She needs to hear somebody say, I am sorry. And for her to believe it to accept it.”

This can be very difficult for narcissist who primarily does not want to confront their own shame, to the extent of deleting it entirely from their being. They have invested a lot of time in the personality and behavioral routines which have emerged as a result of not facing that shame. The amount of emotion and empathic ability a narcissist deletes is what places them where they are on the spectrum. 

Narcissists have problem with authenticity. Narcissists reject, resent, hate, and persecute, genuine authenticity, wholesomeness, the integrity to do the right thing. They are experts at the face value act of “being seen to be doing the right thing” for their own public image and supply-reward system. The difficulty in helping an assist through the healing process is that they will not accept authenticity because they do not/cannot resonate with it at all. 

Therefore, were a person who abused the narcissist as a child, to step into the room and say “I am so sorry for what I did, and I mean it”; the narcissist would not accept that as a reality. 

The structure of their being relies on multiple supply/support , a structure of orientation which dissolves as soon as they accept “I’m sorry”.  For them to be able to progress is normal people, they need to hear those words from somebody who they can accept it from, which is unlikely to be the original abuser.

Another major factor under recognition is narcissists have a heightened sense of expectancy, so what they perceive to be an abuse toward them is in many cases, the failing of the world in general to meet their higher than reasonable expectancy. 

That “daddy did not buy her a pony for Christmas” has triggered her lifelong antisocial behavior personality, is interpreted by her as being an abuse because she cannot accept with the child’s mind which narcissists operate from regardless of actual age. Instead it is interpreted as willful and malignant nastiness inflicted upon her by somebody who was supposed to support her but let her down; this becomes the model for the concept of ‘love’ which she will repeat in various forms with every relationship she has. 

She will only level out and stabilize in her behavior when she has to maintain public image in the eyes of society, usually only when she has achieved that superiority status of her world being put to right, that she feels settled now. For her to be able to attain that, she needs to persecute somebody is who she has dehumanized not only in her own mind but in the community around them. 

Narcissist require victims and they will invent them to achieve their goal. Others recognize that goal as grandiosity, superiority, dehumanization of others, while those who believe the paradigm created by the narcissist, along with a narcissist who projects it, recognize it to be accepted and normal. 

It is normal that everybody should have a pony for Christmas, everybody has a pony for Christmas, there is something wrong with people who don’t. The narcissist is clever. It is not actually a pony for Christmas which is the topic here, they call it the feeling of safety and that target who was woken up to them, they call a threat. 

Thus, when the narcissist leaves a relationship in which they have exploited behind closed doors that partner, the narcissist says that the person is a danger and has abused her. 

On her say-so, her victim is prosecuted for domestic abuse and gains a bad reputation by her supply network, which is an extended abuse network who do not even know him, simply to satisfy her need to appear to be a normal person in the community. What she has achieved by this is to maximize her yield of support/supply. She can get more energy from 10 or 20 people looking after her occasionally, then she can get from one person who has exclusively dedicated himself to that. 

For many men entering into relationships, this is the situation they are facing. Men are sacrificed to this cause all the time in the name of feminism. It is why the phrase ‘feminism is cancer’ has been coined by those who are aware of what is happening to our communities. 

The “Internet cult of narcissism” is 5th Wave feminism using social media to indoctrinate the general female culture with a blueprint strategy of divide-and-control. 

Female supremacy is domestic terrorism. It recruits vulnerable members of society to become its agents. It recruits female narcissist to become its agents. It blurs the line between those two agencies.

The role of men in the community is not to reinforce the ‘divide and control’ by avoiding all females, which is the MGTOW rhetoric. Historically, men are designed to physically, emotionally and mentally to be protectors. 

At this time in history, men’s best way of protecting everybody is to identify the enemy is an extremist philosophy which is brainwashing women against men. 

Somehow, men have got to get women to see that is what’s happening and for women to decide that in a world out of balance, the only way any of us can attain balance is by working together for the harmony, doing so knowledgeably. That genders are not ‘opposite’ but in fact are ‘complementary’. We are physically, mentally, emotionally designed for union and when we do so, divine pleasure results. 

The man is not trying to abuse her by deconditioning her away from a cult which is designed to destroy relationships and communities. He’s trying to protect her from it and from her own destructive, negative tendencies. 

If feminism was worthy of being accepted, it would be teaching women how better to get on with men; not how to exploit and punish them for not being women. 

For women to learn how better to get on with men, open communication with men who are of their own mind is preferable than projecting strawman arguments at them. 

Male Domestic Abuse Survivor

Back in counseling, because the state she left me in after invading my life. A service which I am paying for because I need it ASAP and the free charity services relied on by the state have an eighteen month waiting list for men because women get “emergency” preferential treatment. 

It was not until I read this website;

https://wwww.helpguide.org/articles/abuse/help-for-men-who-are-being-abused.htm

did I recognize that I had been putting up with domestic abuse. In my recent relationship, in previous relationships and all through my life. 

I’d thought all that crap was normal; because I experienced it most of my life in most of my relationships including from my parents during childhood. I had thought there was something wrong with me because an unrecognized feeling of discomfort and wrongness about what is expected of me and relationship routines I had accepted because I thought that was normal.  

I only recognized it as actually being abusive when I saw it listed in bullet point, and identified that’s what I’ve been through. Repeatedly. 

Almost the entire social recognition of domestic abuse and certainly that recognized by the court system, is that men are unilaterally abusive and women are unilaterally victims. It just ain’t so! 

It’s a cultural thing, not just personal to me. That I am a communicator and have been through so much of it, it’s obvious I’m going to be talking about it. 

A lot of the time, the abusers do not even recognize what they’re doing is abusive and neither do the victims. It is being culturally reinforced that it is normality for her to abuse him in a variety of ways and get away with it, partly because everybody knows the program; “we live in a male dominated culture and women are vulnerable!” We are told this every week! Because it serves an agenda!

Nobody thought it was wrong to have Negro slaves at the time in history where that was normal and everyday for a lot of people. 

Nobody outside of Islam thinks it is wrong to use a usury based currency system because it’s so normal to us, despite once having understood how the financial system works, it creates a black hole of debt that gets bigger exponentially, devaluing everything requiring more lending and higher interest rates in an endless loop. 

How can women get away with domestic abuse so often? Here are three reasons; 

1. Because nobody recognizes that’s what it is. 

2. Nobody stands up against it. Why don’t men stand up against their abusive girlfriends and tell them to fuck off? Because men need sex and women apparently don’t, at least that’s how most of them act toward most men most of the time and men are damned if we openly discuss it and suggest that women do actually need recreational sex regularly too. Abusers use sex as leverage to exploit and control men, the pleasure they get is from that as much empowerment and control as it is physical. It is controlling behavior, it is abuse. 

3. As soon as a victim of a narcissistic abuser recognize what is happening to them, the narcissist shouts and cries about how their victim is the abuser and they have been victimized. It is all about supply to them, except they call it support. As a result men are afraid to stand up against their abusers in case society punished them for it - which it ties, often involving police and legal system who unquestioningly protect the female and endorse her lies. 

This is what the mgtow movement (men going their own way) is about; recognizing the one thing of value which women have to men in modern times is sexual. It is also about the man recognizing his own worth.

Yet most of us desire to be in dedicated monogamous stable relationships. When people come together who can rise above all of that and maintain a level above all else, to enjoy mutual pleasure of each other without the accompanying bullshit. Without taking energy from a partner which is the black hole system of destruction all over again. 

It is about being respectable (deserving of being respected) by being respectable (in how we behave). 

narcissism cult

narcissism cult


Internet cult of narcissism is the 5th Wave feminism designed to segregate and control by persecuting males. It relies on triggering and embedding paranoid fear responses in females towards males. Remember, humanity and evolution is about communication, comprehension and integration!


Less than basic qualification level psychology training is imprinted onto the masses who re-affirm the paradigm by finding common frame of reference through it. A system to analyze behaviors which so few people question is corrupt and designed to create the results intended by an agenda.

A pattern is presented. Analyze the behavior of the people who you are closest with. Identify whether it conforms to the pattern.

The pattern in it self is inaccurate. Therefore it’s analysis is not correct. People behaving accordingly, are enacting routines of destruction, both their own and the closest ones.

Leverage. Where peoples behaviour does not conform to the pattern, to fake it as excuse to react as if it does, creates ongoing cognitive bias, is symptomatic of narcissism [in this context], is manipulation and fabrication. Re-interpretation the observed to conform it to pattern instead of accepting the original intent which does not conform to pattern.

The outcome is used to justify the abusive behaviour. The justification of non-accountability is relied on as it to excuse the perpetrators behavior. By imposing a non-accurate pattern into a situation, just to instil a sensation of control and describe it as empowerment, where the same behaviour outside of the filter of the cults pattern, is abuse.

Females are being targeted, men are being alienated. A part of the corruption embedded into the pattern is any male who attempts to explain all of this to a female, is through the eyes of the pattern, perceived as an abuser. How are males supposed to protect their loved ones when the form that protection takes in their manipulated and brainwashed perceptions, is interpreted as an act of abuse?

The Divide

The Divide

She gets it off her chest.
She bitches about him to all her friends and asks their advice.

He’s not in a relationship with her.
He’s in a relationship with a hive system.
The public terminology describes it as her support network.

The practicality, once we strip it of biased meanings to describe the situation within context of agenda based paradigms, is;
She’s striving to balance between opinions of those who affect her.
He’s having to adapt to all that.

The whoever’s of her community and their issues, objectives, attitudes, agenda’s, beliefs and prejudice, has become a system of leverage affecting both him and the entity of their private relationship, something personal between them as a couple which should exclude everyone else. His argument is that it is not a private relationship, if she’s in tangled with a lot of other people who are affecting it.

He would prefer that if she has any problems, she faced him directly about them so they can work through it together. This should not involve other people who will only distract them from personal intuition necessary to find sustainable harmony.

What she is doing by talking with people who don’t know him, about it, is creating a situation where he does not even know there is a problem, but their relationship is being affected by her attitude changing to conform to however her friends are telling her to behave.

He sees only that other people, outsiders, are playing games, controlling the harmony he is trying to build and which they should both be trying to build together, to the exclusion of external forces. Their energy is dissipating outward to serve a multitude instead of being retained and empowered for them both to thrive. It dooms the relationship which requires sufficient energy to be sustainable.

Thus, he has no authority within their relationship although strangers do.
Its stability is destabilized. Through no fault of his own. So he reconciles; she is unstable.

Her friends will collectively protect themselves by saying he is the element which has destabilized her. She has to weigh between her community and support network, versus her relationship. He does not identify this as monogamy because she is playing and being played by multiple games which he has become entangled because of her.

Society purposefuly-mistakenly regards his opinion about this as “his being dominating and controlling in the relationship.” The label causes her anxiety and she retreats from him, from the relationship, because it is a tag used by the social agenda of causing division and fear instead of healing and harmony. It creates targets for discrimination out of people who are supportive of their relationship partner.

We live in a community where it is more acceptable to sacrifice the relationship than it is to sacrifice the so-called support network, even when it can be identified that they are not being supportive but are playing control games; which is an abuse, from which he is trying to protect her from in society. Society protects its rights to play such control games under the guise of describing it as being supportive.

Most of this is understated to such extent people cannot recognise it as the underlaying dynamic of relationship break-ups. Where he is able to highlight that these are the dynamics and the leverage in play, he is accused of being a complete bastard by everybody who, are intentionally or not (manipulator or zombie), exploiting those levers. They are shaken up by it so they defend themselves and point out that he is now destabilizing their network.

Although not his primary intention, he is by consequence destabilizing it because it is a network built on the accepting of an inhumane condition which he does not accept to be righteous behaviour. Such condition is subversive and covert but no less frightening or abusive than are overt prejudices of racism, sexism, etc. To be party to abusive systems is to be a party to an abuse network. Many people do not recognize this to be a wrong, the same way nobody questioned slavery when it was deemed ‘normal’.

Her support network will protect her from the abusive man by discouraging her from having anything more to do with him. The man is now widely known as being abusive and destabilizing of people, which is the exact opposite of everything he has set out to do, how he has acted and what he believes in.

The above scenario outlines normal life for most men in our communities.

The period during which the couple get together and officially separate, is generally termed ‘the relationship’. These incidents are the tests and trials which relationships go through. “Us against the World” / “Society is not your friend.”

The safe-space between couples only exists when both partners are actively protecting it from and against other people’s opinions and interference. Women who behave that way (as described above), are known amongst men who have experienced this dynamic as being users; are identified as being both abused and abusers.

The so-called friendship network usually do not actually know the guy in question. Some of them may have met him on one on several occasions. Their opinion is prejudiced by the position she puts herself in, of being on one hand uncertain and on the other, attempting to be the compromise between everybody else around her. She positions herself in the centre of her universe, for maximum leverage and attention gain.

This is in contrast with putting an intimate relationship in the centre of a universe, as both partners must do for that relationship to survive. Relationships are about working together, or they are about exploitation. This is true of couples and this is true of social networks, communities.

The most disposable factor here is the penis which she puts into the centre of her root chakra, into her body, and it’s associated electromagnetic system for which we are designed to couple-up and combine; for personal balance and for spiritual evolution.

Feminism encourages women that “strong women” are those who can survive independently of intimate relationships with males. Our biologies are designed such we need that. Humanism is about seeing beyond segregational agenda’s, achieving personal empowerment through natural union. Strong People are those who tell their fake friends to fuck off for splitting up their supportive relationships.

“I have accepted this person as the other part of me, my balance, and it works and it makes us both stronger.” 

Divided, we become embroiled in and exploited by covert energy exploitation games. ‘Abuse disguised as support’ relies on brainwashing people into believing natural balance is abuse, into believing that dedicating energy to achieving natural balance is being weak.

You can not harmonise as an equal with someone who seeks only to exploit you and make you feel lucky for it; you can only serve them and their exploitation agendas. Often, people do not know they are agents of those agendas because they conform to political correctness instead of to reality. Do not serve people who seek only to exploit you.

"A very common aspect of psychological abuse and manipulation is for the abuser to claim that the victim is being abusive towards them ... the abusers “victim complex” and “gaslighting” ..." Nicholas Clare

 

Achieving Harmony

Achieving Harmony

Acceptance. Forgiveness. Letting go of everything (of all contexts) and simply being. This is stability. Ensure you do this, regularly, at least once a day preferably at least once an hour until it becomes a continual, automatic, state of being. Being in harmony. 

The spiritual, practical message as the core of religions goes through many traditions, though centuries. Osiris said it. Christ said it. Mohammed said it. Apparently mainstream Humans easily forget it and seldom act on it unless they have to. As soon as a cultural power base emerges around this teaching, it becomes corrupted. The message is rejected along with the corrupt religion. 

It is one of the very few things we do have any control over in our lives, and it occurs internally. Anything external to it is a distraction from it yet it affects the external reality because it affects our relationship with it. A balanced center is a very different entity to an imbalanced center. 

It is advice for every individual on how we can be happier and achieve stability. As an individual and as a community. Be wary of anything which goes against that.

Witches

Witches

Do you know what happened last time women ‘won’ ‘the gender war’ which decent people refuse to play? Women were killing men and getting away with it, so there was a social mandate by the ruling power at the time. We are taught that men persecuted women by killing witches. Have you read the legal documents they used to assess that? No, most people have not. I did.

It says this, to summarise: There is Good which is communities striving to work in harmony and there is Evil manufacture of social illness which is divisionism. ‘The Good’ was described as ‘God’. That specific Evil was described as ‘devil’ from French d’evil, the evil. Women who cavorted with the evil of  ill intent and creating dis-harmony in the communities. It was a time where dis-harmony would result in loss of crops and cultural stability, therefore death from starvation, un-hygiene; famine and disease were widespread and rampant.

History has remembered it as being a masogynist witch cull as an excuse to persecute women. At the time, the word Witch meant something different to the reinvented meaning we use today. Back then it meant Bitch. In the sense we still use the word Bitch for today, not a female dog but a nasty woman who acts of spite and malice.

This is why the medieval treatise on identifying Devil worshiping in communities is called the Malleus Maleficarum (The Black Witch), it is based around the word ‘malificeum’ which literally means ‘mischief and harmful workings’. To function from malicious intent, is imbalance. To bring that into the community, is to summon devils into the community.

That is all it was originally intended to mean, to do, to be about. The word ‘magic’ historically meant the same thing for which we now use ‘manifestation’. Strip the context of the supernatural distraction and you see it for what it is, relevant to today.

There are male witches. It was not a war against females, as contemporary feminists have us believe to justify their vengeful hate against men. Those specific trouble-makers bringing spite into our communities and spreading venom, are the exact same “bitches” who in a more spiritually focussed time, were literally put to death to cleanse the community so that the majority of people could achieve and live in the peace and harmony they strove for. They did not have the convenience culture we enjoy which is exploiting the ecological harmony beyond breaking point; they literally had to work the earth with their hands if they wanted to eat, or they would die, often horribly.

Anybody jeapordizing the survival of the community was a serious problem for everyone. Compare it with a body which functions in balance verses a cancer tumor which needs removing for the organism to survive. The temples of the Orthodox power of the day is designed around a Human body, specifically the body of ‘Christ’ (previously ‘Osiris’) which is ‘a human being living in harmony’ toward which we aspire.

Today, anybody jeapordizing the survival of the community is a serious problem for their targets but because it does not directly affect everyone, nobody outside of the problem wants to get involved, and the malicious person gets away with it.

In medieval times was foreseen a future where the fall of the harmony would bring about an age where devils roam freely (which we have) and the destruction of the natural balance (which we are witnessing). We do not at this time have widespread famine and disease in our own convenience based consumerist communities, although both are extant in the world.

The fall of the church as the dominant power, from its aspiration of harmony; it’s corruption and demise, has occurred, is still occurring. The communities still exist. We no longer have the guidance we once had. We no longer have the harmony we once had. Today most people reject the church and its spiritual teachings. Most people who openly consider themselves christians do not know what the original intent was for, seeing them by their actions and seeing through the public image facade for which it is used in modern times. People see the words but not the meanings. What words mean today, is not what was intended by it before the fall. We live in a different context where the words are confusions, but the meanings are more relevant than ever.

Purge ourselves, and the community, of the cancer of spite and malice, manipulation and corruption. Work actively optimistically toward the harmony. This is not uniquely a religious teaching.

Achieve Harmony.

Over The Load

Over The Load


“We’re over. I’m over you.”

“You’re still clearly not. You’re not over your last ex yet, either, from all the times you mentioned your anger and upset about him. I know how humans are and I know you intimately enough to know this, so don’t lie to me about it. You’re putting shields up, that's all. And you’re indoctrinating yourself into routine-responses hoping I will conform to your self-delusion. When we step outside of the world of mind-games, lies and self-delusions, we step into a more real reality. You know that we still ‘have feelings’ about each other. You’re in denial. I do not have to accept your lies as reality. You lie to me about having gotten over me, so I can only assume you’re also lying about our relationship finishing.

Because, simply put: we are both in the world and we are still communicating. The scientists, buddhists, and energy workers alike all say the same thing; nothing ends. It changes but it does not end. Human delusion draws a line and says ‘try to ignore the far side of it’. I do not have to draw that line at all. That is what experiencing Truth is. I do not have to draw that line where other people choose to put it or try to persuade and coerce me to re-affirm their own delusion.

I believe from experience; all delusions are toxic (to varying degrees). The more delusional a person is, the more toxic they are. I do not intend to be toxic, most certainly not to please other people’s toxic attitudes and delusional beliefs. Because I am Human. That is what it is, to be Human.”

“Overload. Too much information. Evidence that you are disfunctional.”

“The worlds of words are confusion. The world of intuition is divine. I am providing you with as a friend and as a Human Being. I am doing my job as a communicator and as a Healer. It is called, encouraging you to think straight. Don’t talk me cheap, I am better than that.

You say it’s over between us, you have a problem and you are using me as a buffer for it. That is not ‘our relationship being over’ at all. You’re lying, I am asking you to stop doing that. Stop lying to yourself and stop lying to other people.”

“You won’t back down.”

“I’m not trying to intimidate you into staying in a relationship with you. I’m being a brilliant boyfriend and teaching you about psychology. You’re a difficult one. Im helping you to overcome that difficulty. If what you mean is, you don’t want to have sex with me - at the moment you are too toxic and low on energy for that to be anything worthwhile apart from some momentary pleasure. You probably do need sexual healing and regularly because most people do, we are designed that way. You’re carrying the mental virus which mixes up sexuality with control, domination, energy games. It’s vampirism. I agree, that part of our relationship is over for today at least. You’d have to be an extremist to say ‘for ever’ because who knows. Apart from us who know how beautiful and brilliant we were together before you changed. You are playing energy-strategies, and i am already putting far more into you than you are putting into me. What comes out of it, for me is clarification and ability to share with others this information. Communicator, healer, doing my job in the community.”

“You talk too much.”

“I need to distract myself, both of us. Im playing your game. We could sit here in silence long enough to face the deeper truths of how we feel, finding a level between us. We both know that contains a lot of sexual energy. You asked me to avoid it, i am. That's why I keep talking.”

“I wish you’d shut up.” (What you say hurts my brain because it goes against what my mind says

“Is that why you have been avoiding me?”

“Yes. No. Which bit? You confused me.”

“You’re here because you are trying to get over me, because your mind says you should do that. The confusion is that we both enjoy sex and we both recently enjoyed it with each other. Our bodies are both craving one another and we are facing that. The mind says to turn away from accepting it and going forward in that direction to embrace each other. It’s ripping us in half so we are facing down the desire until it becomes easier to do so. To begin with it upset us both to do that, was emotionally painful. We need to care for our bodies, emotions and minds. When sex is good it heals all that. For whatever reason, your top-heavy and your mind is saying to break apart. You created that. My job is to determine if its a permanent split or simply a re-orientation so we can come back at it from a better angle in future, to build on what we already achieved. One of us gets to make the decision for both of us.”

“That will be me. I’m in control.”

“You are battling your left-brain. We both are. Thats where your imbalance is. Previously, you found sexuality to be a very powerful way to shut it off. It is. It is our and other species design blueprint after all.”

“I should go now.”

“It’s very difficult for men in this generation. Traditionally, one person making the decision for both permitted the man to ‘be a man’ and step forward to the challenge, to physically embrace you with a hug which we both need, all people need hugs its natural. To take that further. To enter us into the realm of sensual and sexual healing instead of words and power games. To initiate balance. Thats how basic it has been traditionally and we are hardwired for that from our species social evolution encoded into our dna.

In todays culture it is women who are permitted to be that yang aspect and any man who speaks out against female supremacy is persecuted for being a mysoginist and promotor of rape culture. If, at this time when you are telling me it is over between us, I were to make any attempt to touch you physically in any way, or even simply to say words of encouragement in the direction of our reunion, which in my opinion is preferable than people splitting up, or words testing your resolve; I would be committing a criminal act of sexual coercion or sexual assault, for which you can have me punished through the court system. So I can do none of that stuff without putting myself at risk. You are indeed the one in control. All I can do is write about how men feel as well as I can. I could be writing about exploitation of men in relationships.”

“Write about whatever you want, I won’t ever read it.” And she is thinking, ‘I don’t want a write with a clever brain, I want a simple guy who can fuck me on tap and piss off when I need my own space’.

And he is thinking; ‘I can hear her thoughts and I agree with wanting exactly the same thing, which is exactly what we had before we got confused and started conforming to social normalities (external to our private world, imported in, mind-virus) of not being seen to be in that sort of relationship because public image says it’s wrong where practicality says its successful.'

And he is also thinking: "I will write about whatever I want regardless of your opinion. You don't own my creative outlet."

So he says, not for the first time; “Human Evolution is always going to be the path of convenience.” This time he adds; “Regression is the path of pain. A great spiritual teacher, Vasseius taught us; ‘The pain which we feel is the Love we with-hold.’ He came a long way to remind us that specific thing. It’s the advice we need to hear.”

Quest for Authenticity

I do not have to be politically correct.

I am constantly persecuted by those who do, for being a communicator.

What is political correctness?

Political correctness is a creed. When you live by a creed, you obey its discipline.

It tells you how to behave. You are an agent of its philosophy.

Political correctness is the asserting that’s your opinion and beliefs are whatever suits the society that day. With a change of political orientation, top down from the governor, the agents of political correctness unquestioningly change their asserted opinions and believes in accordance with the new regime.

This principle, they are zombies. What they use and act on as personal beliefs are not personal believes founded from experience and thinking for yourself. Political correctness is when the governor programs the robots how to think and act. That is how insects behave in a hive.

I do not have to be politically correct because I am not an insect being; I am a human being. I be human. It is a verb. My own personal opinions and believes are built on the reality of experience through a mind which thinks for it self. I do not have to concord with the malleable, programmed, beliefs and opinions of others.

Why do people submit to political correctness?

Because they are trying to fit in and be normal. They do not wish to stand out and rock the boat. Whatever their own natural, inmate personality might otherwise be, must be repressed so that they can conform to the factory production line static model of “normality”.

George Orwell wrote a book called 1984 explaining that in a totalitarian state, the majority of people are brainwashed through many aspects of the dominator society to become politically correct in their minds; which is to say, they become zombies, unquestioningly performing activities and running subroutines indoctrinated into them by the control state.

Not only this, their brains are corrupted in such away they will defensively protect their rights to be politically correct with a superior attitude, discriminating against anything outside of it. A faculty of self-righteous left-brain extremism, which is unbalanced despite being described by the society as reasonable. Reasonable means ‘for a reason’, which is agenda. It does not mean in balance and preferable which most people assume it to because of their social conditioning.
 
I was deconditioned and trained to decondition other people. I am a human survivor. Deprogramming people of the brainwashed cult is my purpose in the human community. It is not an easy position because the zombies are programmed to take me down through whatever means necessary, usually by manipulation and lies.

What does political correctness do to the mind?

Any questioning conformity to a public image means that the individual knows they are different from the public image they are seeking to project out to the world. Immediately, there is no authenticity in their activities. [see my blog on modernism]

“She is a fake, but she does not know she is a fake!” Breakfast At Tiffany’s.

In short, political correctness is social conditioning. It exists not to help the species to adapt, thrive and survive but to enslave the species to function as an insect colony supporting the overlords.

Example. Political correctness has led to the situation where the governments media propaganda machine, the BBC [223 see blog on the skull&bones society] will no longer employ people based on their ability to do the job best, they will employ them to tick the boxes that they have fair representation of gender and skin color, because gender and skin colour are two '-ism issues' highlighted to be tackled by political correctness. If Einstein or Edison applied there, they would not be employed.

The second criteria is people willing to lie to support the state societies smokescreen, all those people wiling to conform to the paradigm of politically correctness, are willing to change their attitudes and beliefs as soon as the governor changes the goalposts. Funding goes to those categories primarily.

Increasingly a 10% minority group (official government statistics from the office of national statistics UK and equivalent USA source), the LGBT community has a loud enough voice that 'discrimination against pan-sexuality' now includes the offense of saying 'no' to those people at all. 

The same agenda of anti-racism, feminism and any other segregationist movement which specifies one group vs mainstream, where simply ‘the people’ should suffice, non-specificially. Segregation is created by controlling the context of policies regarding specified minorities. As soon as a group is specified, segregation has occurred.

As a result, everybody who wishes to work with the BBC must pretend to be bisexual and/or loudly approve of open bisexuality, whether they are or not; because within that environment, bisexuality is political correctness. Employment of agents for promotion of an agenda outweighs the necessary ability to do the job well.

Certainly there are (pc-category:bisexuals) who can do the job well. Government statistics are there are nine times more (pc-category:non-bisexual) people able to do the job at least that well.

I personally have no problems at all with people being bisexual or with bisexual people working within the media industries. That is actually my own cultural background. It is why I used this example: I know it to be true from experience.

The point being made here is; anybody working with in that environment, must pretend to be that thing in order to fit in. Immediately, the creation of a cognitive dissonance as the mainstream culture. That is the purpose of political correctness.

Cognitive dissonance is disbelief syndrome. When people are having to pretend to be a certain way to survive, which is different from how they actually, naturally are in order to survive, every individual secretly believes there is something wrong with them. Because they are different from the commonly excepted normality.

In the example above, the target arena is sexuality. The context is controlled by what ever the target arena is. All discourse occurs through that context. All conclusions are biased by that contextual process.

When an individual exists for a prolonged period or in many cases even for a very brief time, within an environment where they have to pretend to be something they’re not, that individual feels fake. That individual is encouraged to believe that feeling fake is normal and right. The individual aspires toward feeling fake before they expire towards being genuine. Any individual who aspires towards being genuine with in such a community, is alienated and prejudiced against. 

            Fake = Normal. 
            Real = Sinister.

The quest for authenticity has become recognized as a psychiatric disorder, by the people with the psychiatric disorder who intend everybody to suffer similar psychiatric disorder.

The only solution is to step out of that paradigm, and to see it for what it is. That is the purpose of this blog.

The issue is not the segregation issue, the situational issue is the issue. Why has (specified minority group agenda) even come into it?

You do not have to be politically correct either.

People with cognitive bias cannot think clearly. People with cognitive bias cannot think straight. They can obey orders provided that the instructions are within the context of the programming. They are computers. They are robots.

What is lost in political correctness is genuine people. Attempting to streamline the community so that everybody function with a better attitude towards life, the result is that everybody within that community can no longer think clearly because, their contexts have been perverted.

Your understanding of the meanings of words is not what those words mean when you read a dictionary. It is what those words mean according to the community within which you live. That is what Orwell warned us about happening.

In the lifelong search for authentic, genuine people who do not agree to compromise themselves, the only way we can get through to the zombies why we are the way we are and why it is important, is to explain it in the language they understand. They regard it to be a spiritual mission and the quest for living truthfully is regarded as religion. It conveniently becomes ‘the other’ which it is permissible to scorn because religious people are not politically correct.

The bias is that they have put everything into one box and labeled it ‘outside of pc’ instead of actively developing of the capacity to see that context process is not what is happening in the minds of the genuine people.

You do not have to be politically correct. You could get real.

PC in the community.

Political correctness is top down. As soon as misinformation enters the domain, PC people will conform to the paradigm found it on that misinformation. A lie and servants of the lie.

Adhering to political correctness gives individuals the excuse that they were not personally responsible for anything which goes wrong. Because they are not acting on their own true nature which they believe subconsciously to be a problem and a natural because it does not innately conform to the pc. It is about accountability.

“I am not accountable for my own actions because my own actions were based on what I have to do to conform to my community, not on but I would have done had I been able to do it my own way. As a result, I am innocent of the consequence of my actions.”

This philosophy is polarized against what previous generations have throughout history regarded as maturity to be responsible for one’s own actions.

The falseness of this argument was proved at the Nuremberg Trials where war criminals were held accountable for their own individual actions while ‘just following orders’.

The questioning of hierarchical authority is necessary to avoid abuses. Every step of the way. So, the hierarchy protects itself by actively discouraging that. Political correctness is to not question the authority of the higher tier. Insects know their place. As a result, hierarchy systems are rife with many forms of corruption which gets swept under the carpet. Occasionally someone higher up will you someone lower down as a scapegoat, sending a shockwave through the communities.

It is not only the media industry. It is all across the board in every state hierarchy system. It is the nature of corporate infrastructure. The hierarchy is the hive.

I am in no way encouraging anyone to be anti-social.