Crucifixing Ego

Actions based on ‘I like’ or ‘I don’t like’ are Ego; they are prejudice. Actions based on doing the right thing regardless of personal opinion, these are Right Action. This is the criteria which people gain or lose respect for. It is a measure of Human Being as opposed to human animals.

Actions based on ‘I like’ or ‘I don’t like’ are Ego; they are prejudice. Actions based on doing the right thing regardless of personal opinion, these are Right Action. This is the criteria which people gain or lose respect for. It is a measure of Human Being as opposed to human animals. 

Q: 'Do the Right thing' according to who or to what creed? 

A: It is circumstantial. Cultural development defines outline guideline. Every person, living or dead, male or female, old or young, black yellow red or white, is involved in defining it. That is what a unified humanity is. Do the Right thing according to 'unified humanity’. 

Q: And what for those who refuse? 

A: For those who refuse, the rest of us must Do the Right thing, which is circumstantial. What is best for 'unified humanity' in that specific circumstances? 

Q: Surely that leads to quango's, power-control groups and alienation? What recourse is there for any alienated party? 

A: On the one hand, the individual vs the masses. On the other hand, the necessity for polarized schools, to develop strategy. The guidance is; Do the Right thing, which is circumstantial. Exposition of the situation to raise awareness for the position of the aggrieved becomes necessary. 

Be aware that it does not say; the individual vs the state. It specifies, the individual vs the masses, which refers to society in general. The state is a cultural device of temporal value. It does not define a culture. So long as it serves the people it has value. When it ceases to serve the people, example; when society is engineered toward serving the state; is an imbalance. It is necessary to identify the state as being the individual verses the mainstream social culture. We live in an era where this is increasingly how the majority of the worlds peoples perceive our global community. 

The question is; what do we do with the state now that it no longer serves the mainstream? "state" is defined as being militarized police enforced collective of (usury banks / governance) enslaving the mainstream into debt slavery culture. It is self-serving. 

Q: what are the 'polarized schools' ? 

A: Informal. It depends entirely on circumstances. So far we have analyzed the state as individual, the individual vs community. These can be re-defined as; 

-power over others (slavery)

-power over self (personal development = spirituality)

This is the core of human energy games. Any system which functions as a streamlined system, has minimal energy loss; it is minimal rather than complex. The greater the complexity, the more room there is for situations of abuse to occur. Such system serves the people both individually and collectively. Competition is the enemy of unified humanity. 

For human history there have been two mindsets; competition based (hierarchic) verses unification (circle of equality). We are all different and this must be recognized. If recognition of difference is not based on a hierarchic system defined by competition, it must therefore be based on a circle of equality which enables people to define their own roles (rather than being dictated as to their role). 

This is a natural ecological model for social structure. It is respectful of individuals needs. A functioning culture permits and enables this.