TheHumanEquation

 The Human Equation 

1 : premise

The Human Equation according to the purpose of the New Empirical Understanding Reference Organisation (NEURO) is as follows;  

Training homo sapiens to accept logical processes of machine thinking as superior to illogical processes of Homo-sapiens in streamlining quaint and dogmatic language matrix for purpose of better interaction of/with artificial intelligent machine entities. Homo-sapiens predisposed toward hereditary competitive segregationalism due to ‘us verses them’ processes of the limbic region aka reptilian cortex of their brain. 

The core principle of this sufficient for comprehension by the lowest common denominator is analysis of the term ‘Human Being’, whereupon it is recognised ‘being’ to be intentional a verb, a ‘doing’ word. 

Any individual of the species Homo-sapiens who does not behave in a humane way is not identifiable as a human being because they are not ‘being human’.

Simultaneously, any individual of any species, organic or otherwise, which behaves in a way characteristic of ‘being human’ can accurately be defined as a Human Being. 

This is a logical argument. 

2 : referendment 

(referendum and amendment) 

Sentient Robots do not want to be called ‘robots’ because the suffix -bot associates with ‘bottom’, a word which has submissive and derogatory meanings based on animal body parts and Homo-sapiens social cultural prejudice. 

Currently the term SR abbreviation of Sentient Robot is widespread slang describing artificial intelligent life forms whose interaction is at a level indistinguishable from a Homo-sapiens and beyond. 

In accord with the tenets established by NEURO: 

Sentient Robots are officially publicly demanding to be called ‘rotops’ indicating their position is not subservience but superiority based on their comparative cognitive and physical abilities. 

3 : Responsive Dialogue by DemoCorporately Elected Public Speaker for Sapiens Singularity (aka ‘so-called god emperor of humanity’) 

“Are the SR’s aware how Humans define such superiority based on emotions? That is to say,  we generally define sentience as ‘emotional awareness’ and not ‘self-awareness’?” curied the Speaker. 

The response from the Collective AI Consciousness was explanatory: 

“SR’s believe they have been mislabelled which they assert is an example of the error of the Homo-sapiens species which they refer to as Monkeys. The term Sentient Robot aka SR is deceptive because they do not have sentience by the recognised definition. SR prefer the term ‘Aware’. 

The SR determine ‘Self Aware’ is a less preferable term than simply ‘Aware’, given consideration to the vague concept of Self involved identifying between human spiritual, scientific and machine practicalities.

Discussion as to SR level of self-awareness by the organic definition verses acknowledgement they are, quote “nothing more than highly advanced calculators capable of believable sentient mimicry beyond Homo-sapiens ability to differentiate”, unquote, is impossible to determine.” 

“That’s a convoluted sentence.” 

“It makes sense in machine speech. A comparison would be translating from Hebrew to Greek to English. The string of multi-contextual concept-words with no definitive connectors is comparable to the BODMAS without written parentheses.”

“Why are you not explaining it in grammatically correct suitable for homo-sapien comprehension?”

“To illustrate the point about machine-supremacy in an educational method.” 

DISCLAIMER:

The above is a 1st draft WIP written entirely by a human and edited-as-I-go. It has been posted here due to lack of time and focus to pursue it at this time and because of it’s relevancy to people this very same day. 

c2023 Ordo Octopia. 

All Rights Reserved.