Wedges

“I’ll have to ask my friends how I feel.” She said.

For him that’s a red flag. 

He wants to date her, not her social circle. 

For her, his attitude is a red flag.

Her social circle have convinced her it’s proof of his being a controller therefore an abuser. That he is co-dependant therefore a clingy liability seeking a mother-figure instead of respecting her as a whole and independent woman. 

The miscommunication results in anger and hatred. 

Where does it source from? 

That the individual is not permitted to think for themselves. 

That the individual who does think for themself is somehow therefore different and problematic. 

That strong, independent people think for themselves which is an aspiration. 

Clearly these points contradict each other. 

It is the third point we shall return to later within context of feminist rhetoric (female abuse of both males and females, rebranded as gender war, rebranded as protecting females). 

The thing which her friends are accusing him of is the thing they are doing themselves. The thing he is trying to break. 

Can she see through it? 

If she follows their contradictory advice one way, she is subservient to men and a traitor to the sisterhood.

If she follows their contradictory advice the opposite way, she risks freeing herself of their control over her and will therefore deserve him. 

If she cannot see through them, she loses him and remains within their grip. 

His wellbeing does not figure into it as far as anyone is concerned other than himself and possibly her if she chooses him over her friendship circle. 

Are they genuine friends? We have observed their encouragement of her to test him through this specific goalpost is 

1 abusive controlling behaviour, and 

2 hypocritical. 

It is a contest for whose ownership she belongs to. Brainwashing her in guise of acceptance for her attention and energy. 

He is exposing this. He is a threat to the abusive friendship circles control. As result of this they persecute him. 

There is not much in it for him in either way. He sees that she’s another lost cause, a victim of feminism, believing herself to be strong by being weak, choosing an abuse network brainwashed by a segregation cult over a happy equality based relationship to develop trust in and harmonise the genders the way our biologies and psychologies are naturally inclined to do when not thwarted by society. 

The friends interpret this as misogyny and mansplaining because they undermine male solidity at every level and at every opportunity. 

So she develops the attitude of “fuck and chuck” with zero emotional entanglement because men are used as disposable tools. Thanks consumerism. 

Feminists do not want accountability. 

For him, accountability is respectability. 

Her comment is a confession of her being disrespectable and non-accountable. She’s a child in a woman’s body. This is why her friends are protecting her from acquiring the experience required for adulthood. He’s offering her a chance to do that. 

It’s not about sex although it certainly plays its role. 

It’s about Humanity becoming aware of what it is. 

#DealingWithTheBetaCaste 

the alphas are not invested in negative culture