Organised Crime includes Conspiracy. A group of people making an allegation about a target with zero evidence is not itself evidence. It is however defamation, persecution, potentially also trespass. All of which is abuse.
One form of abuse with zero evidence is weighed against another form of abuse for which there is evidence.
This system of analysis is regarded as credible. It is regarded as more credible than the alternative which is to compromise somewhere and ignore evidence while at the same time accepting hearsay in place of evidence. That system is called corruption.
Yes this does allow people to get away with crimes. It also establishes a precedent to reduce worse crimes. There is an honourable logic in that.
It is not at all the same thing as defending people who have got away with crimes.
It has nothing to do with gender bias and “patriarchal thinking”. It is simply use of logic and reason to evaluate an either/or situation to determine the most just and sensible system to be used.
“Belief is not Knowing. If you Knew you would not Believe” - anonymous wisdom
I can believe a person to be guilty of a crime but that does not mean I 100% know they did it. It means without questioning myself or the person making the allegation I will act as if a thing is true even though I do not know it to be true. The technical word for that is ‘delusional’. It’s a mistake to operate that way if your interest is in Truth.
Unfortunately a lot of people exploiting other people and situations for their own gain, be it financial or to fulfil a bitter need for vengeance, or to bask in the sickly glow of drama and involvement with vice, have very little interest in the actual Truth.