This blog is about my most recent experiences with Restore Britain.
Restore Britain vetted my social media accounts.
They can’t have me on the team because I’m a risk to the parties reputation, on two points;
1 my Facebook account has private posts. Why aren’t they public? What is their content? It might be a risk to the party if something ugly comes out later about someone who works for them. It’s a red flag to the parties transparency demand.
So much for Rupert Lowe talking about Restore Britain being for libertarianism principles and against government overreach. Facepalm. In fairness, this is not Lowes decision, it is middle-management.
2 my outspoken views on Russia, in that Putins anti-Nazi stance is not the “Russian propaganda” which the Kiev regime and the British left-wing insist it is.
Before I say anything more, I want to highlight that as far as I am concerned, Ukraine/Russia has as much to do with Britain as has Israel/Judea/Palestine, which is to say: nothing to do with us, it is not our problem.
I believe it is curious that both conflicts fall along the same electromagnetic longitudinal-line, which in the holistic model suggests an underlaying solar-gravitational issue is affecting human electromagnetic bio-processing at significant cultural level. That key-line is known for it.
Active terrorist-organisation-aligned agents within parliament and on the streets of Britain however, are our problem. I identify Restore Britain as our best hope to clean up that mess before anyone else is harmed by unwanted foreign interests affecting our homelands and our governance.
Regarding my informed opinion of the background on Ukraine/Russia conflict;
I am going from a BBC documentary aired in 2016 about a Nazi training facility in Ukraine, which is an equivalent to an ISIS training facility. Russia has since demolished it and killed all the Nazi’s, the same as they dodged to SS HQ in Berlin which event ended WW2. Ukraine absolutely did have a Nazi problem. It had hired them to repress Russian-Ukranians in east Ukraine who believed their lives were better under Russia than under the Kiev Regime, which in 2014 broke the Minsk accords, the peace treaty they had with Russia. Donbas citizens were massacred by westernised Ukranians, survivors begged Russia for help. Russia used it to justify seizing ancestral Russian territory which was being mismanaged by Kiev. Kiev is still being manipulated by western influence. I do not believe this makes me "pro-Russia" so much as "pro-honesty". Truth is my God.
All of the events I mentioned are on international historic public record. It has been described as “conspiracy theory” in attempt to whitewash history. The BBC has done a u-turn on its policy. We cannot trust the BBC. Kiev regime and the British government alike are running propaganda campaigns on their populations, in alignment with Ursula von Der Leyen's EU reichstag. I reject EU influence on Britain. This is another reason to support Lowe. I reject EU influence on Europe. I love Europe. EU and British left-wing "open borders" policy is destroying it.
I don’t know if red-flagging me for those two points makes Restore Britain unreasonable. I can understand their reasoning. I'd do the same if I were them, because they have to factor for items which individuals do not have to take into account with regards the impact of Free Speech. It comes with accountability.
I do believe it suggests Restore Britain, just like all the other British parties, has a Russophobia problem; probably because of the currently perceived public stance on that item, which itself is a result of leftist propaganda.
Ironic that it highlights how the leftists align with communism but want to fight Russia which is communist, while simultaneously the leftists want to fight fascism but are against a nation which is fighting against fascism. It exposes the confusing dilemma of democratic principle. Those people don't think straight. That's a factor which attracted me to Restore Britain; Lowe thinks straight.
The Restore Britain stance on Russia is from politeering rather than ethical. Or it could be that Restore Britain decision-makers are aligned further to the right than is the model for Restore which Rupert Lowe has presented. I believe it probable that his party has been infiltrated by the far-right. That is a problem for the party. Whether Lowe is saying one thing while doing another is a grey area which serves both and neither. When accused of being far-right, Lowe shrugged and dismissed it as being irrelevant to the parties intentions.
The X account would not survive a smear campaign because of my views, which the party perceive to be distinctly different than those the party line. Lowe himself has supported the individuals right to believe and say whatever they want, and that right is distinct from the party policy.
They have to protect themselves from that level of flak. It’s understandable. It’s regrettable.
I will still vote for Restore Britain because I align with their libertarian policies and because I respect Rupert Lowes work with exposing the grooming gangs and with the Public Accounts Committee. I would not have voted for any of the other parties anyway. For the politically disaffected it's the best answer from having done all the maths.
They are distancing themselves from me.
I choose not to be disheartened and feel rejected. I choose it identify correctly that perhaps I am a more powerful and important voice than I had previously imagined. The same time I received the feedback from Restore Britain I learned that my blog has hit 80,600 views this month, an average of 2,600 views a day. For irrelevant little me, that's epic.
