Wednesday, 23 September 2020

Energy Hygiene

The problem is not me. The problem is other people resent it when I can see through their bullcrap and refuse to accept it and put up with it. 

Those same people label me as a problem and cause me problems for me, instead of acknowledging I have a right as do any of us to an opinion. Neither do they acknowledge that perhaps I’m correct in my analysis that they have delusion or hypocrisy without being aware of it about themselves. 

They’re too caught up in fear based anger and the resulting domination they feel they must assert over anyone potentially instrumental in their personal evolution toward becoming a better human being. 

How do you get through to people, in the heat of the argument when they’re angry, when they can’t choose peaceful resolution? 

How do you get through to them that they are wading through an energy field projected at them by their having touched something toxic and it’s like an energetic disease, it affects the mind? 

This is a real science, there a physics simple to understand: everything is electromagnetic energy with a particle charge, it’s quantum mechanics. 

So if you have a dysfunctional relationship with your ex partner which has manifested in a particular dynamic, to go near that person is to reaffirm and pick up that stagnant energy, the shape of it, the particle charge of that energetic environment contaminates your auric field which you then transfer onto the next people who you see because of not having good energy hygiene. 

These words, the concept of energy-hygiene seems strange to people because they’ve not come across it often if at all. 

So they laugh and think it’s made up nonsense instead of taking it seriously and realising what I am trying to do here, what thousands of people on this planet are trying to achieve, this goal of waking people up to something which is affecting us all, all of the time without us realising it. It’s controlling people’s behaviour. 

You want freedom to do whatever you want to do, you might even deserve that, you should have it but it comes with accountability. 

If you are touching something toxic and picking up the toxic vibration from it and transmitting that to other people, creating traumatic negative experiences with other people, it’s like a plague spreading. 

You see this all around you with COVID-19. We are all afraid of a physical disease affecting us but there are also energetic viruses; because everything is vibrating, so if you touch something which vibrates in a dodgy way, it affects how you are vibrating and then you start vibrating in a dodgy way too and you take that as toxic behaviour to other people. 

We see it all the time but as soon as somebody gets straight enough to explain it to other people, to live in that world, the very next first thing which happens is disbelief syndrome kicks in with the people around and their anger amplifies and they try using unscrupulous methods  to take down the person who is telling them about how necessary it is for us to have clean energy-hygiene. 

They think it’s nonsense, they believe the aware people are insane because they do not see cause and effect. It is because they’re not observing, they’re not seeing what’s going on, they’ve been told this is nonsense so they are afraid to look at the world in this way. 

As soon as you step out of the state of ignorance to see the world in this way you recognise its happening everywhere. 

It’s commonly known that you pick up the behavioural patterns of the people you hang around with, parents see it in their kids on a regular basis. 

So if you hang around with somebody who has a bad vibration, it affects you and you take their bad vibration towards other people and that affects them. It manifests as behaviour. Whatever contexts we can find within our vocabulary and imaginations to justify spreading the energy like a virus is case specific although the underlying structure behind that, the thing you’re having problems recognising is even real, is energy wave structures transmitting through people. It is frequency spectrum. 

Scientists tell us all the time, we know this is how energy works. The problem is you’re not used to seeing it as a sociological phenomena, seeing a human in terms of that person being energy vibrating in a certain shape. And the shape is affected by whatever shape that person touches or goes near. 

If you go to spiritually clean place it cleanses you or you take your toxins there and contaminate it. If you go to spiritually dirty place, it contaminates you and when you go to see other people you spread that energy to other people. And when you get free of the dirty vibes enough to see it all for what it really is, come see me. 



See next blog: 
AFG (Acceptance Forgiveness Gratitude)



Saturday, 19 September 2020

Too Good Too True

“If it’s too good to be true, it probably is.”  Agenda Based Social Doctrine


It’s a social meme for creating disfunctional people and relationships. Belief in this is not wisdom, it is setting yourself up for fail. It means when you have it good you reject it and opt for second best. It prevents the development of a certain ability based on acceptance and establishing solidity in that higher level. 


If you have the ability, you can connect to that higher level. We all deserve happiness. We are able to make the right person happy because that naturally happens until we block it, turn away from it, create a lie to undermine the purity which is the strength of a quality relationship. 


Not everyone is dysfunctional in that way. Some people accept the happiness and accept living life at that higher level of stability. It’s about love and our ability to trust others and ourselves. To choose to connect at that level. 


The first step in that sort of intimacy is to raise awareness of it. As a community we are mentally polluted with memes which control our attitudes and behaviour. Those who do not give in to the delusion of doubt are a different type of people to those who habitually do. To recover permanently would be good.


It’s simple. We connect to the heart as the centre of the universe instead of to the reptilian brain and it’s paranoid need to hide, control and judge, especially to judge. Instead we simple let go and flow with the ever changing tide of universal energies. Take a deep breath and release, the stress and judgement. The issue blows away and is forgotten. 


What’s left is critical choice from a higher perception. 


eValu


“No one is responsible for your happiness but you.” Will Smith



Beliefs become hardwired as our way of thinking. They become rigid absolutes. This is unhealthy for us.


Why is it one person believes one thing, a different person please a different thing? The beliefs are software not absolutes. They are opinion, not truths. Humans commonly mistake beliefs for truths and act accordingly. They control our behaviour. 


So, if people are full up of nonsense but believe it, they behave like idiots. If people are full up of sense and believe it, they behave sane. 


To be sensitive is to be open and receptive to many different ideas, without necessarily having developed an ability to critically judge between fact and fantasy, right and wrong, good and bad, sense and nonsense, truth and delusions. Such people are vulnerable. 


In my 30+ years of counselling, I would say this includes most people to such an extent that the ones who are an exception of the rule are notable because they stand out. 


I put them into two categories, those who rigidly will not back down and yet are full of nonsense versus those who rigidly will not back down because they are aligned with the truth. 


You have to know truth to be able to recognise it in other people that’s a huge part of the problem, as soon as you accept and believe in and mistake a lie as a truth you are delusional. 


The ability to tell the difference between a lie in the truth begins with questioning everything instead of unquestioningly accepting information and mistaking it as truth, believing in it.


The second factor which helps to develop the ability to tell the difference between a lie in the truth is you’re never lie.


Again, the factor of delusion plays its part because unquestioningly believe in a thing to be true and acting accordingly, without identifying if it is true or not, undermines our ability to tell the truth.


—————


A simple board game. 

The board game grid is 11 squares by 11 squares. The game last for 10 rounds. You begin in the centre of the board at one edge. Opposite you is the finish line which is called the truth. To your left and you’re right are the sides of the game board which are called delusion. Every turn you move one step. If you have chosen to stay aligned with truth you move one step forward towards truth. Any other choice you move sideways instead of forwards. If, by the end of the game, you are still floating around somewhere in the board and have not cross the finish line and left the edge of the board, you are living in confusion and delusion.


In real life we do not have ten turns to assess the truth and align with it, we have one and it is continuous. Sadly, the vast majority of people are floating around in a sea of delusion, because they are not aligned to truth.  


—————


Any opinion is a belief not a truth. Therefore to mistake it for truth is delusional. Check your belief structure. Is your self doubt based on truth or delusion? If you identify that your self-doubt is based on delusion, reassess yourself. Say out loud: “I choose to no longer in power this delusion because it does not serve the truth.”


First step of this is to accept and this is very often the most difficult thing to do. 


“I accept that I was wrong up until this moment. As of now I go forward having consciously decided to align with truth.”


“I am not a piece of scum. I am worthy.”


“Everybody makes mistakes so we can learn from them, it does not make us bad people.”


I’m sure you have the imagination to invent whatever positive self talk is relevant to your circumstances.


—————


Because of this (above), it means anything anyone says is not immediately by default the truth. It is their opinion. Therefore it is probable that it is a delusion. 


If someone says (anything at all), do you:


a. Immediately be convinced it is the truth without questioning it?


b. Reject it as bullcrap?


c. Assess it to identify if it is truth or belief, if it is opinion, delusion, nonsense. 


d. Decide which, a b or c, is most relevant, depending on the circumstances. 


The ability to critically judge which category a thing is, is a life skill. 


The ability to reject anything which is not truth, is a life skill. 


Most people do not develop it very strong because most people are not trained to think clearly. 


People accept delusions and suffer the consequences. 


You don’t have to be delusional. You get to choose who you are, how you react to other people’s statements of opinion.







Monday, 14 September 2020

Quest For Relevance

The Quest for Relevance 


Through thousands of generations, throughout a multitude of different cultures, the Quest for Relevance has revealed to us an ineffable wisdom. 


The Purposeful Dialogue 

and Three Critical Questions 



1 : The Purposeful Dialogue


Our way of life is transitory. 


Everything we do is temporary, with exception of carving stone, planting trees and making children. Even then, there are no guarantees. 


People who do not carve stone, plant trees and/or make children are not part of the Human continuum. They’re part of the augmentation to provide for the continuum or they are vampires upon it. 


Most of the time most of us are not going to be carving stone, planting trees or making babies. 



2 : The Three Critical Questions 


Of all of the impermanent things it is possible for us to do: what is worth doing?


After great deliberation it was generally understood there to be one concept which answered this question: 


Satisfaction.


Emotional, Mental, Physical, Spiritual.


What activities accomplish this? 


After great deliberation it was necessarily asked: Is there anything at all outside of this which is worth doing? 



3 : The Fourth Awareness 


After great deliberation it was necessarily asked; is there any other thing not covered by these responses, which we have forgotten to be aware of? 


To date, despite various movements representing short-lived attempts to do so, there has been no solid reply to the fourth critical question (and very few to the third). 


Many claim it to be irrelevant. 


Many others agree that despite it being apparently unanswerable, the Dilemma of Unknowable Alternative is the most necessary and important of them all. 


Many others cannot distinguish the nature of any difference between the third and fourth. 


Many others explain it is imperative to understand the difference between the third and fourth. 



4 : A Promoted Discourse (insert)


A structured logical attempt to elucidate on the Critical Questions. 


“To aspire to higher things”


“Why?”


“For the sake of (it)” ‘it’ being in this case, higher things - for the sake of higher things.


“To bring you or others satisfaction.”


“Yes.”


“Aspiration is satisfaction.”


“Even if it is unobtainable or unobtained?”


“The quest for relevance includes the quest for satisfaction regardless of successful attainment.” 


“What of those who pursue unsatisfactory purpose? To not aspire. To aspire toward degradation.” 


“Are they relevant? Are they doing things worth doing?”


“Yes, Yes. Yes, No. No, Yes. No, No. These are the four castes of possible exemptions, those who pursue unsatisfactory purpose.


Yes, Yes. Relevant and Worthy. If they are relevant and worthy, they are not exempt. 


Yes, No. Relevant and Unworthy. If they are relevant they are also necessarily worthy. They are not exempt. The concept is self-defeating. It does not exist. It is delusional to establish grounding here. 


No, Yes. Irrelevant and Worthy. If they are worthy they are also necessarily relevant. They are not exempt. The concept is self-defeating. It does not exist. It is delusional to establish grounding here. 


No, No. Irrelevant and unworthy. This is the only group who answer the third critical question in a meaningful albeit negative way. Those who pursue activities which are neither relevant nor worthy do exist. Can their work be permanent? Can this lead us to answer the fourth question?”


“Answering each question either reveals it to have already been answered or that it creates more questions. It is a system which folds upon itself: ultimately all questions have already been answered, or they result in the same conclusion, a question which creates more questions, all of which have already been answered with the exception of the one question which creates more questions.”


“Have you come to a place in your approach where there are no longer any questions which have not already been answered, do not create more questions?”


“That place exists?”


“In many different guises. It is only the place where the question cannot be answered and requires more questions which is of concern to those who explore the third and fourth critical questions.”


3 Is there anything outside of satisfaction worth doing? 


4 Is there anything outside our rationale which we have overlooked?


“I do not enjoy the work I do.” 


“Does it creates results worth doing?”


“No. It is neither relevant nor worthy.”


“Then you are a fool to continue doing it.”


“That is why I must continue doing it. To discover relevance of irrelevancy. To answer the fourth critical question. That a person enacts an irrelevant and unworthy task, the futility, creates its own purpose, the purpose of its being.”


“You thus have aspiration. You have discovered satisfaction. It is relevant and worthy. You are not a fool.”


“Were I to cease to do it?” 


“That would be preferable.”


“Is there anything at all so futile as to be not contain this lesson of awareness? 


“That is why we ask these questions. That is their purpose. You have simply rephrased and therefore understood the third and fourth critical questions.”


“Were I to do nothing at all?”


“Only one who has succeeded at that can knowingly answer.”



5 : Concision (insert)


The Purposeful Dialogue

The Three Critical Questions 

The Dilemma Unknown

The Promoted Discourse


What is worth doing?

What activities accomplish this? 

Is there anything outside of this worth doing? 

Is there anything else to be aware of? 


Our task is to posit debate regarding the information presented as response to the Quest for Relevance. It is advised to tackle the topic one step at a time. It is also encouraged that any innovation on the individuals part be fully explored. 



6 : Undisclosed Evolution (insert)


Is it Useful?

Is it Accountable? 

Is it necessary for it to be (useful, accountable)? 


If it exists it serves purpose, it is relevant.

If it exists yet is unaccountable, it exists, it serves purpose. 


Are today’s interpretations what was originally intended? 

Do we suffer from cognitive bias? 


These questions are why the fourth critical question exists, to raise our awareness of such factors. 


All of these questions have already been integrated into the basic model. 



7 : The Golden Standard (insert)


“By what criteria do we ascertain Relevance?”


“That, respected and enlightened one, is the Golden Question.” 


“Does relevance necessarily have to be permanent? The answer is No, because we ourselves are not permanent. Only by our actions can we strive for permanence, by carving stone, planting trees or making children. This does not ipso facto mean we are ourselves irrelevant. Thus, those who do not carve stone, plant trees or make babies, are also not ipso facto irrelevant. Those are not the only criteria by which we evaluate relevancy. We also respect augmentation of the human continuum to have relevance.” 


“So the only irrelevant and unworthy caste are the vampiric who exploit the human continuum without augmenting it?”


“It is possible they also may have relevancy and worth, albeit relative. Relevancy is relative. It is about how we relate a thing to another. How we relate between things. Thus we must establish polarised or yet more complicated poly-optional parameters between things to establish weight worth.” 


“Who it is more useful to defines its respective worth. A lake owner requires water less than a desert nomad. To the lake owner water falls from the skies to fill his lake, water is everywhere, it is almost worthless. To the desert nomad water is rare and sacred, worth more than gold and perhaps more than life itself.” 


“We all need water.”


“Thus it has irrefutable worth. Do we all need gold?” 


“Most people never encounter it.”


“Are they any less for never encountering it?”


“No.”


“Then gold is worth significantly less than water.”


“Not to the owner of a gold mine in a desert.” 


“Now you see it. Worth is relative. Relevance is relative. Relativity is about relevancy. Revelation is elevation, it inherently has value.” 


“Insight and education.”


“Intuition and indoctrination.”


“Polarised parts of the same whole.”


“A dynamic. There is always a scale system between polarities, by which to gauge value. In its simplest form, five stages of transition. Pure left, bias left, perfect balance, bias right, pure right.”


“It could be left, centre, right.”


“We require versatility to assess complexity. Halfway between the oasis and the sea there is sand. Travel the opposite direction, halfway between the oasis and the sea there is sand. Without the sand there is no oasis, only a river connecting the left sea to the right sea.” 





These pages are inserts from the Tau of the SpaceWays, addendum & additional notes. 

Accountability Is Respectability

Timeline 1 - safe

At every moment, accountable humans consciously choose the optimal path for species survival and evolution. 


Timeline 2 - collapse


All people lost in the fallout of unaccountable people, collectively experiencing the horrors of planetary collapse, narcissistic destruction and death. 


Timeline 3 - toxicity 


Unaccountable people consciously creating the horrors of planetary collapse, narcissistic destruction and death, at every opportunity. 



The difference between these three possible Timelines has one factor: 


Accountability 

(including holding others accountable). 


Accountability for Self & self-action.

Accountability for safeguarding others.

Accountability for the environment. 


The environment, which supports us and provides us with life. (air, water, food, clothes, shelter, warmth). 


Accountability is Responsibility

Responsibility is Respectability 




Wednesday, 22 July 2020

FascistBook



Before it was taken over by fascism (prejudiced censorship, removal of freedom of speech human rights, extremist political agenda, etc) Facebook was for awhile a very good communication platform. 

Communication means connecting with people with whom we share a harmony. 

More often it means connecting with people who challenge us to develop because we nearly but not quite share a harmony. 

Much more often, especially if you use Facebook Groups, it means encountering internet trolls whose hate and aggression makes FB a negative experience for everyone. An arena of low-energy, bickering people attempting to drag each other down and discredit each other is unhealthy, it’s a sick pit. 

Finding the good people out there is like a needle in a haystack. Thankfully through interest-groups I’ve been fortunate to encounter a handful of such people with whom mutual support and information is shared and enjoyed. I’m grateful for that. 

As a result of being targeted by FascistBook for posting concern that non-scientific processes are rushing through a depopulation agenda using the WMD of vaccines which is a war crime, terrorism, acts against against humanity, I have decided to boycott Facebook for this specific reason.


“...depopulation through vaccinations, we aim to reduce the population by ten percent” Bill Gates 


Secondarily, FB actively protects abusive trolls and therefore is also an abuse network. When I report people for clearly making targeted attacks which is against FB terms and conditions, abusers working as admin for FB universally respond by saying they do not consider personal attacks to be breach of their T&C which specifically states personal attacks to be breach of T&C. 

By contrast I have been repeatedly banned from FB for posting statements of concern against injecting chemicals and which are defined as “biohazard” and aborted fetus DNA and similar carcinogenic toxins into people who then exhibit symptoms of Autism and other diseases. 

A part of this concern is the whitewash and stonewalling of literally thousands of people who attempt to report this exact thing, because it goes against the profit-margin of the pharmaceutical industry. 

This is not a conspiracy theory. Every step of the connection has been made and revealed by woke people such as myself who are therefore targets of the corporate agenda and the policies they act on despite international law and despite warnings from the elected president of the USA he will shut them down if they continue to repress people. 

FaceBook has continued to unlawfully repress people. Therefore it deserves to be shut down despite how useful it has been as a communication tool. 

Persecuted for being pro-science and pro-health and pro-common-sense by people rebranding that attitude as unwanted, anti-science and anti-health, so they can justify to themselves their fear-driven, for-profit agenda of the poisoning of a fear-driven population who are victims of their terrorism. 

Citation: ‘the Bill Gates depopulation through controlled pandemic and vaccine scam’.

I’m a survivor and I’m getting ahead of the curve, because that’s how survivors survive, by leaving FaceBook and taking my business and my energy elsewhere. 

So, to those handful of good people with whom I have connected in FaceBook; PM me your contact details if you have any interest in furthering a relationship. 

I’m going to be offline more often, growing veg, painting canvas, counselling trauma-abuse survivors, writing about socio-psychology, playing D&D and studying chi energy, acupressure and herbalism. Because that’s what I do. 

Peace ~ 
 
 
 
UPDATE 26.8.2020 
 
I went and did it. FB account deleted. It takes 90 days for them to complete the deletion, so it looks like I'll be heading into 2021 a free man.  

Step By Step

Among the primary reasons (plural) they are not evolving it’s because they cannot go beyond the ‘us versus them’, ‘win versus lose’ paradigm. 

To them, every exchange is an energy struggle which will result in either winning or losing. To their mind and mode, their way of being, everything is a competition. 

The concept of a win-win situation is the best way to get through to them that there is a mode of being more satisfactory than the aggression of constantly struggling to prove one’s supremacy above the other or failing to do so resulting in belief of inferiority. 

The attainment of win-win situations where everybody benefits as a standard procedure becomes a higher paradigm in which it is not necessary to identify and use language to reinforce winner versus loser. 

Seeking positive solutions necessitates adapting to this higher paradigm.

My astute student asked me whether an understanding of win-win paradigm is better or worse than an understanding of win versus lose paradigm. 

I asked my astute student whether I could use that as an illustration of the mentality of competition, of comparing one versus the other using what is necessarily a limited system of identifying criteria.