The following is a transcript of the above video.
I make no claim of ownership to the property.
The information it contains is relevant to every living person.
So we have a situation.
We’ve got a bunch of activists who have been arrested for some eco-activism, for example; against fracking.
They use in their defense that they have been arrested for upholding the police oath, which is to protect life and property and to uphold the Law.
We call a police officer into the witness stand and we ask a few questions.
The first one is; “In your professional opinion officer, would you say that the threat of environmental damage and destruction on this planet is of an equal magnitude to a threat of world war?"
He can either say; “I don’t know,” in which case we say; “With due respect officer, we have to question your competence as a police officer. We are talking about one of the most serious threats to life and property on the planet. Would you like another go at answering the question.?” He has got to say "yes it is". It is obvious it is of a similar threat of magnitude. He can’t say no, obviously he can’t because it is that serious.
So having answered “yes it is of that order of magnitude”, the next question is;
“Did you officer take an oath to protect life and property and to uphold the Law?”
“Yes I did.”
"So would you consider then that the threat of environmental damage and destruction on this planet is, if not the most serious threat to life and property on the planet, one of the top two or three most serious threats, the other one being global war itself or perhaps starvation or natural disease, or something like that. It is a very serious threat indeed."
In terms of Law we have the Criminal Damage Act of 1972 'aggravated criminal damage is damage or destroying any property with intent to endanger, knowing life would be endangered.'
There is no country in the world in the global context of the internet, there is no country in the world a government can say that it is Lawful to damage and destroy any property with intent, knowing life would be endangered. It is a global law; people don’t know it yet.
So again in the global context of the internet, any property then becomes the earth. It is being damaged and destroyed, life is being endangered. It is being done knowingly by the entire workforce of the planet.
"So then officer, would you say that the threat of environmental damage and destruction on this planet is not only the most serious threat to life and property but also the most serious breach of Law on the planet.”
And the answer has to be “yes.”
“So then officer; have these activists been arrested for upholding the police oath?”
The answer is “yes” and the case falls.
At this point in time, if this information is made public either through a high court case which would be very public, or by making a film about it and it going viral on the internet, at that point in time the police force collectively will have to make a decision.
Do they want to carry on upholding unlawful legislation made by a criminal government under the influence of criminal bankers?
Or are they going to turn round and make some arrests and make their mothers proud of them?
original youtube video: BEST DEFENCE FOR Eco-Activists using the TRUE Common Law