Monday 16 October 2017

Real Reason

This blog continues the narrative of Irreason.

Real Reason

If you are having to resort to using reason (agenda) to achieve balance, you are not in balance. If you are not in balance, the assumption that reason will get you there is an unbalanced assumption. Another word for 'unbalanced assumption' is 'irrational'. It is irrational that the use of reason will result in harmony.

When you let go of all that, detach from all mental diversions, and accept the moment as it is, and simply be, not owned by a specific idiom, context, condition: that is the only way to return to balance. Harmony cannot be created by forcing diversions upon a natural equilibrium. If a thing achieves perfect balance, all reasons dissolve, all agendas vanish.

Anybody who is using reason and promoting the use of reason as a dominating faculty above the nature of letting go and accepting and permitting peace to occur naturally, is not functioning as an agent of harmony but as an agent of perpetuating disruptions. Why choose one imbalance over another unless it is to exploit for gain? 

"Problems cannot be solved by the level of awareness that created them." Albert Einstein

Wednesday 4 October 2017

Case Study Notes

This blog is extension of Case Study

1 discrediting their strawman

When person B redefines person A.

You are re-labelling me for the purpose of your own super-ego -controlled idiom.

So, when you look at me, you do not see me.

Instead you see your own delusion. 

It is not based on reality, of me being what I am.

Then what happens next is whenever I act in a way that does not conform to your idiom, you persuade yourself and anybody else who believes you unquestioningly, your zombies aka flying monkeys, that I am broken and 'acting uncharacteristically'.

You convince people I have gone mad or that I am up to something suspicious.

All because you have no real interest in having a genuine relationship with me and getting to know who I really am.

2 officially already knowing you better than you do

How can anybody else be more of an expert on me than me?

When I am my intuition, when I am most true to myself there is no mental conditioning at all.
It is pure raw reflex from the soul.
It is not social programming.

3 confidence is self-worth they seek to destroy

Standing up for myself is not an act of rebellion.

It is a Human Right. 

4 personal detail

The State workers prejudice against me for acting on my degree level state education (in a department which the fascists have since shut down).

I was taught Creative Thinking. 

"Outside of the box" mentality and a "of monetary value" skill set.

These two things are inseparable. Part of the education is to recognize that only copyists, not originals, segregate and exclude creative being and ingenuity. That art history has showed us the most valuable works of art come from the pioneers, from the non-conformists. 

How to be a pioneer and a non-conformist is necessary to create the most valuable works of art, equally as much as developing the practical skill set of physically producing art. 

Rich Man

"Unmarried Men Are ‘A Problem’ For Society"

Out of touch with reality Tory MP Iain Duncan Smith

South Wales there are two types of women.

Women who react to the word 'marriage' the same way they react to the slime beast oozing into the room. They back off and disappear.

Women who hate men because no man has voluntarily asked them for marriage.

There are two sub-types of these:

First, most common, are stage three Disney Princess Syndrome, when the cartoon expectation bubble has burst and their man-hate prevents them from going out and getting laid, which they need.

Second, sexually experienced women who can get sex at the drop of a skirt and to whom men are an object like a dildo, a wallet, a taxi, perhaps even social positioning. Do not be mistaken that they regard men as human beings. These women were raised into disposable consumerism and that's what men are. This subgroup crosses both original categories to also include the 'marriage=slimebeast' type.

Both these types of women make an exception to one thing:
Rich Man.

To all other men which is literally 99% of men, it triggers 2 warning bells.

Warning bell 1: she wants to marry my money, not me.The 'it is vampire' bell.

Warning bell 2: being secondary to a fictional entity and being secondary to that rich bastard means she is so far up herself she can not even see it. She is going to sleep around behind his back anyway. The 'it is crazy' bell.

Of these 99% of men there are perhaps even as much as half, who decide that being secondary to a fictional entity is worth the pursuit if it means mommy-figure-and-sex.

That 1% rich guy, he don't care. He can afford to throw money at her in exchange for sexetera. He is sleeping around behind her back too because he won't lose her if he gets caught and if he does, so what he can afford to.

The thing about marriage, it gets in the way of the quality part of a relationship because you do not need to be married to have a quality relationship.

Then you get the guys who can see all of the above and decide that playing the game of getting money to get a girl is stupid waste of time. These guys are now called MGTOW because men are redefining the rules of the game vs femdom - at last. Previously these guys were simply lame, or misogynists, or any other insult women could think of.

These type of men can clearly see the big difference between sexetera and marriage. In the old days these were called 'the real men'. When one of these guys chooses her, in the old days she knew he meant it, she was grateful for his attention and worked as hard as he did to be compatible. Those types of women are called 'real women' and although rare, those are the ones you want to marry. Reality is, most guys won't find them because most women won't be them.

So the reality is, men have got to change the system and the way society works. It is traditionally the purpose of men to do this. Women have been doing it for several generations and it has fucked everything up for everyone, yes even themselves. They have proved to be incapable of equality because as soon as they get anywhere close, they start abusing men.

MGTOW is men taking time out to assess the situation. It will be followed by MWHGIT Men Who Have Got It Together (MWGITs or simply GITs). This generation of men will collectively have a strategy, which works, to put men and women where men and women both function best in relation to each other. It recognizes that with individual responsibility comes stop-blagging-me, and with individual respectability comes stop-badgering-me (stop bitching/bullying me). SBM is the future of relationship protocols.

Sex is MUTUAL it does not mean one of us paying the other one for it. We both SHARE pleasure and if it works, if it is any good and worth doing regularly with you to the exclusion of all others, or inclusive of selected thirds, or in preference to videogameheaven, it means ignoring all the bad advice from society, your jealous sister, your controlling parents, your abusive ex-partner who probably gave you what you deserved so shut up about it, and recognize that when men are sexually active their metabolism functions a certain way, and that going against it is going against nature. It is not about sub-dom, it is about switch and mutuality. It is definitely not about brat.

In the old days the word marriage did not mean paperwork contract with the state or religion. It meant regular sex with a person so the two could explore the empowerment which good sex brings. Think about who controls that energy and what you do with it. It's YOUR energy, not the partners, not the states, and if you are mixing it with a person - this is where compatibility is important. In the old days the word sin meant living without sex.

Everything else to do with marriage is about friendship. Union, partnership, sharing resources, caring about the partner as much as you care about yourself, mutual respect, communication. Growth from stability.

What Ian Duncan Smith is talking about is that all men should be secondary to a fictional entity, which is slavery to a delusion, which is slavery full stop. Fuck that twat, why is anybody listening to him anyway? 1% Rich Man perhaps? See how that works?


If things are going that well with someone, marriage is not something to throw into the mix anyway because why risk a good thing?

Case Study


A diagnosis is an opinion. It is not a fact. It is not a Truth.

A professional diagnosis is a professional opinion. It is not a fact. It is not a Truth.

When a person claims that an opinion is inaccurate because it does not accurately describe that person, one of two things can happen.

First, preferably, the person is listened to and the situation re-evaluated. This is called common sense and falls within the broader concept of humanitarianism.

Secondly, the person is ignored and the more accurate information is irrelevant to the professional diagnosis. This is called professional misconduct. In some industries it is called neglect of duty. It is called prejudice and falls within the broader context of abuse.


When a person listens to a rumour and accepts it as a Truth or as a fact without first getting to the bottom of the situation, that person is not respectable. In psychiatry it is a recognised to be a mental disorder falling within a spectrum which includes cognitive dissonance and disbelief syndrome. If they act on the misinformation without requesting clarification from source, such people are recognised to be not fully functioning human beings.

When a person accepts somebody else’ opinion to be a fact or a Truth, they are not doing their own thinking. They immediately become an agent of the original lie. They become party to the corruption. They are now a component in an abuse network.


Identifying the original source becomes imperative in situations 1 and 2 above.


Once having identified that a person has lied and that a network exist to expand upon that lie, it is called corruption. All of the people involved in permeating the lie are also corrupt.

In legal terms it is called a conspiracy. It is a criminal offence. To permeate a lie from a position of authority is called fraud if there is paperwork involved, also professional misconduct, misconduct in office, and/or neglect of duty.

Such a person undermines not only their own authority but also the respectability of all positions of authority. That person should be a target of concern by all other authorities.

*in our case study, a professional criminal manages successfully to divert attention away from their own corruption by making a claim that the victim of the corruption is the person whom everybody should be suspicious of. The criminal does this to maintain their hold on office and ensure their personal income. Other conspirators in the abuse network who are also fabricating paperwork to entrench the original lie continue to pursue the course of action of discrediting the original target whenever the original target speaks out against it. It has a snowball/avalanche effect which extends to the discredited individual being set up by the authorities to criminalise him, thus further undermining his outspoken Truth.


What makes a person a professional is that they profess to be an acting agent of a principle.

The principle of GP’s for example, general practioners also known as Doctors if they have studied to achieve an expensive piece of paper award called a doctorate although this is not essential to be an active GP and hold a registered office, much the same way a teaching qualification is not essential to be a teacher. The principle of doctors is to doctor situations, which means to alter them. A GP is not a professionally qualified Healer which is a very, very different occupation and principle.

The principle of the GP is to unquestioningly do what the computer tells him to do. The academic text books are also based on opinions and solidified using case studies. The opinions based on observational studies of groups of people somewhere else in the world at some other time under different conditions. In terms of science, that is not proper scientific protocol.

Common Sense and Humanitarianism indicates that if, as in our scenario, the case study is a target of abuse by a criminal network operating through the system, and whose opinion has been undermined and replaced officially by a misdiagnosis, that the existence of case studies is irrelevant if one is attempting to establish the truth of any individual situation. Case studies are inaccurate to the reality of situations and exist to cover up corruption. They are not facts. They are not Truths. Case studies exist to maintain a source of income for professionals in office. They do not exist to heal people for the simple reason that healing people involves actually listening to what that person is saying.

“It takes one bad apple to spoil the barrel.” Ancient Folk Wisdom

See also: Case Study Notes


"Developing 'the suspension of disbelief' as a reflex continuum became imperative, not to live out a more comfortable delusion but to decondition the perceptions from deeply entrenched 'educational' and media dogmatic version of reality conforming to the control state."

The faculty of reason, revered unquestioningly as a preferable state of functioning, does not consciously factor that by classic definition a reason is a purpose, a purpose is an agenda. Being reasonable does not mean being balanced (nor humanitarian). It means agent to an often unspecified agenda. It might be reasonable but it is not rational to disclude so many factors which affect scenarios simply because they deter from achieving an agenda. Ergo reason is irrationality.

Unlike so-called 'primitive cultures' Western cognitive perception does not educate regarding the faculties of equality, empathy and of responsibility. Westerners are discouraged from accepting how vastly different any alternative mode of cognitive development might result.

We should question, why am I being encouraged to be reasonable rather than balanced and humane? It is a basic common-sense call. Thus we can see clearly that reasonable behavior and common sense behavior are distinct and segregated into two camps.

The late 18th to early 21st centuries have been described by Western academia as 'the Age of Reason' during which the veneration not of Mind but of a specific Mind Set (a set mind, which means an unyielding, stubborn and rigid mind). From this we can identify that for more than two centuries the domination of a specific form of consciousness to the extent of repression of all other forms of consciousness has held sway throughout Western Imperialism. The consequences that it still does so today involve the denial that any other form of consciousness has merit.

In terms of anthropology this puts Western civilization at a disadvantage of comprehending motivations and understandings not only of our own ancestors and their cultures and interactions, it also induces a xenophobia toward anything not-us. For this reason, more advanced life-forms visiting from other dimensions and worlds do so discretely."

-excerpt from How Not To Be A Sheeple by snakeappletree, 
Ordo Octopia publications (currently not in print)

This narrative continues as Real Reason.
It's theme relates directly to this: A Point To Jude From