FascistBook

Before it was taken over by fascism (prejudiced censorship, removal of freedom of speech human rights, extremist political agenda, etc) Facebook was for awhile a very good communication platform. 

Communication means connecting with people with whom we share a harmony. 

More often it means connecting with people who challenge us to develop because we nearly but not quite share a harmony. 

Much more often, especially if you use Facebook Groups, it means encountering internet trolls whose hate and aggression makes FB a negative experience for everyone. An arena of low-energy, bickering people attempting to drag each other down and discredit each other is unhealthy, it’s a sick pit. 

Finding the good people out there is like a needle in a haystack. Thankfully through interest-groups I’ve been fortunate to encounter a handful of such people with whom mutual support and information is shared and enjoyed. I’m grateful for that. 

As a result of being targeted by FascistBook for posting concern that non-scientific processes are rushing through a depopulation agenda using the WMD of vaccines which is a war crime, terrorism, acts against against humanity, I have decided to boycott Facebook for this specific reason.

“...depopulation through vaccinations, we aim to reduce the population by ten percent” Bill Gates 

Secondarily, FB actively protects abusive trolls and therefore is also an abuse network. When I report people for clearly making targeted attacks which is against FB terms and conditions, abusers working as admin for FB universally respond by saying they do not consider personal attacks to be breach of their T&C which specifically states personal attacks to be breach of T&C. 

By contrast I have been repeatedly banned from FB for posting statements of concern against injecting chemicals and which are defined as “biohazard” and aborted fetus DNA and similar carcinogenic toxins into people who then exhibit symptoms of Autism and other diseases. 

A part of this concern is the whitewash and stonewalling of literally thousands of people who attempt to report this exact thing, because it goes against the profit-margin of the pharmaceutical industry. 

This is not a conspiracy theory. Every step of the connection has been made and revealed by woke people such as myself who are therefore targets of the corporate agenda and the policies they act on despite international law and despite warnings from the elected president of the USA he will shut them down if they continue to repress people. 

FaceBook has continued to unlawfully repress people. Therefore it deserves to be shut down despite how useful it has been as a communication tool. 

Persecuted for being pro-science and pro-health and pro-common-sense by people rebranding that attitude as unwanted, anti-science and anti-health, so they can justify to themselves their fear-driven, for-profit agenda of the poisoning of a fear-driven population who are victims of their terrorism. 

Citation: ‘the Bill Gates depopulation through controlled pandemic and vaccine scam’.

I’m a survivor and I’m getting ahead of the curve, because that’s how survivors survive, by leaving FaceBook and taking my business and my energy elsewhere. 

So, to those handful of good people with whom I have connected in FaceBook; PM me your contact details if you have any interest in furthering a relationship. 

I’m going to be offline more often, growing veg, painting canvas, counselling trauma-abuse survivors, writing about socio-psychology, playing D&D and studying chi energy, acupressure and herbalism. Because that’s what I do. 

Peace ~ 

 

 

 

UPDATE 26.8.2020 

 

I went and did it. FB account deleted. It takes 90 days for them to complete the deletion, so it looks like I'll be heading into 2021 a free man.  

Case Study

1

A diagnosis is an opinion. It is not a fact. It is not a Truth.

A professional diagnosis is a professional opinion. It is not a fact. It is not a Truth.

When a person claims that an opinion is inaccurate because it does not accurately describe that person, one of two things can happen.

First, preferably, the person is listened to and the situation re-evaluated. This is called common sense and falls within the broader concept of humanitarianism.

Secondly, the person is ignored and the more accurate information is irrelevant to the professional diagnosis. This is called professional misconduct. In some industries it is called neglect of duty. It is called prejudice and falls within the broader context of abuse.



2

When a person listens to a rumour and accepts it as a Truth or as a fact without first getting to the bottom of the situation, that person is not respectable. In psychiatry it is a recognised to be a mental disorder falling within a spectrum which includes cognitive dissonance and disbelief syndrome. If they act on the misinformation without requesting clarification from source, such people are recognised to be not fully functioning human beings.

When a person accepts somebody else’ opinion to be a fact or a Truth, they are not doing their own thinking. They immediately become an agent of the original lie. They become party to the corruption. They are now a component in an abuse network.


3

Identifying the original source becomes imperative in situations 1 and 2 above.


4

Once having identified that a person has lied and that a network exist to expand upon that lie, it is called corruption. All of the people involved in permeating the lie are also corrupt.

In legal terms it is called a conspiracy. It is a criminal offence. To permeate a lie from a position of authority is called fraud if there is paperwork involved, also professional misconduct, misconduct in office, and/or neglect of duty.

Such a person undermines not only their own authority but also the respectability of all positions of authority. That person should be a target of concern by all other authorities.

*in our case study, a professional criminal manages successfully to divert attention away from their own corruption by making a claim that the victim of the corruption is the person whom everybody should be suspicious of. The criminal does this to maintain their hold on office and ensure their personal income. Other conspirators in the abuse network who are also fabricating paperwork to entrench the original lie continue to pursue the course of action of discrediting the original target whenever the original target speaks out against it. It has a snowball/avalanche effect which extends to the discredited individual being set up by the authorities to criminalise him, thus further undermining his outspoken Truth.



5

What makes a person a professional is that they profess to be an acting agent of a principle.

The principle of GP’s for example, general practioners also known as Doctors if they have studied to achieve an expensive piece of paper award called a doctorate although this is not essential to be an active GP and hold a registered office, much the same way a teaching qualification is not essential to be a teacher. The principle of doctors is to doctor situations, which means to alter them. A GP is not a professionally qualified Healer which is a very, very different occupation and principle.

The principle of the GP is to unquestioningly do what the computer tells him to do. The academic text books are also based on opinions and solidified using case studies. The opinions based on observational studies of groups of people somewhere else in the world at some other time under different conditions. In terms of science, that is not proper scientific protocol.

Common Sense and Humanitarianism indicates that if, as in our scenario, the case study is a target of abuse by a criminal network operating through the system, and whose opinion has been undermined and replaced officially by a misdiagnosis, that the existence of case studies is irrelevant if one is attempting to establish the truth of any individual situation. Case studies are inaccurate to the reality of situations and exist to cover up corruption. They are not facts. They are not Truths. Case studies exist to maintain a source of income for professionals in office. They do not exist to heal people for the simple reason that healing people involves actually listening to what that person is saying.

“It takes one bad apple to spoil the barrel.” Ancient Folk Wisdom

See also: Case Study Notes

The Naked Truth

The Naked Truth

I switched off because I was fed up of fighting a defensive position, against playing roles in other peoples drama, in which they needed me to be a bad guy to justify their bid for social support amongst people who did not question their motives & integrity, people who accepted their games as the reality. When someone dominates a narrative, the people worth relating with are those who question that narrative as being definitive. Today when people lie to my face because they have sided with another liar, and I can see through all this, I tell them, you are lying to me because you are a zombie. And what upsets them is not that they perceive my statement as an insult, but because they perceive it as the truth. I have ability to hold mirrors up to people face. Why would I choose to hide behind their face when I can wear my naked skull?

So I dedicated a lot of time to the contemplation of “Keeping the Peace” as justification of lies. I can not respect a liar. I barely accept those who cannot tell the difference between truth and lies and assume ‘what they have been told’ is the truth. It is a mental health dis-order called Cognitive Dissonance / Disbelief Syndrome. So many people suffer this and can end it easily by aligning themselves with Truth. The foundation of spirituality is “to see truth you have to be truth”.

Why would you respect a person who knowingly lies to you? It is abuse because it is attempt to mentally impair them, to deviate their cognitive function away from truth. They certainly do not respect you enough to create an honest world between you. Why would you knowingly create a dishonest world whenever you are in a situation to? Is it because you perceive that the liar has more power than you, so you enable and endorse that? You can depower them so easily by exposing, confronting and reprimanding them.

The conclusion I have come to in the situation above is that for those people who lie and create zombies, for personal empowerment for which we historically use the word ‘liche’ (“leech” and “leige”), or under the justification that they lie to keep the peace, both require that the person who has been lied about, the victim of the slander, one who has less influence amongst the zombie horde because they avoid and dump hate onto the target, should exist with less peace. So it is untrue that lies keep the peace. It creates stress and pins it onto the victim.

The victim has three choices. These are the three worlds within the victims power to manifest.

One: (inaction) accept the situation and let them think whatever they want, because they are zombies they are incapable of clarity of thought anyway. This is to endorse the slander and be a party to it.  Remain identified as “victim”.

Two: (action) protest and attempt to win zombies over to the truth by telling the other side of the story which they have never asked to hear because they are zombies. Discredit the liars. Refute being ‘victim’ yet perpetuate war instead of bringing peace. Justified by; truth and understanding within a community which has been perverted by lies.

Three: (ascension) rise above the whole situation, detach, and know that aligning with truth means to rise above the dirt in which the zombies wallow, to attain a spiritual purity which liches cannot even see. Let them rot in their own deceptions and illusions.

In terms of transactional analysis it look like this:

adult - adult = truth - truth
parent - child = liar - zombie
child - child = zombie - zombie

“Grown-ups can handle the truth” and the famous retort: “Why do you lie to your children?” (Your duty is to support them to survive in adult life.)

“All this will be for nothing. We will have been for nothing. Defined by their histories, distorted to fit into their narrative. Until all that is left of us are the monsters in the stories they tell their children.” Captain Flint, Black Sails

Cick HERE for Universal Truth

SocialSecurityAdministrationAct1992 Section187

19.6.2012 To HSBC With reference to your letter dated 12.6.2012; You inform me that my account is being micro-managed. As such I am sure that you are aware that I am in receipt of state benefits as my only source of income. In accordance with the Social Security Administration Act 1992; “Certain benefit to be inalienable. 187.—(1) Subject to the provision of this Act, every assignment of or charge on– (a) benefit as defined in section 122 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992; [3(a) a jobseeker’s allowance;] (b) any income-related benefit; or (c) child benefit, and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void;” This is an Act of Parliament which over-rides banks taking charges from an account of people who are in receipt of any of the following benefits; • Income Support • Tax Credits • Child Benefit • Job seekers allowance • Incapacity benefit • Disability living allowance •Attendance Allowance • CSA payments • Other DWP payments. These social security benefits are granted to stop hardship and are designed to meet basic day to day needs, and are exempt from arrestment in terms of section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. Section 45 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 Chapter 21 part 1 is an identical provision to the said section 187 of the 1992 Act. This stipulates that the banks can not apply any charges to money received as benefit, and any such charges are unlawful and therefore disallowed. Therefore I request that you waive all fees currently pending at this time. In light of the above Act I do not expect for any charges to be applied to my account in the future. Furthermore, as my financial difficulties do stem from charges made to my account by the bank during the past few years, I request a hardcopy of all transactions since the account was opened and immediate reimbursement of all bank charges that have been levied. Failure to act in accordance with the governing policies will of course result in my taking the matter to Law. Your presumed response of citing small print involved with contractual obligation will be dealt with by my reminding you that such terms & conditions are unlawful and are therefore voided by the above mentioned statutes, as clearly stated. Thank you for your help in this matter. A reply arrived today dated 27.6.12. Halfway down page 2 after a lot of waffle it says; "I note your comments in which you advise that the only source of income into the account is derived from state benefits paid to yourself. If my understanding of the position is correct you allege that the bank is unlawfully deducting charges from your account when you are in receipt of benefits, when the government has implied that this is the minimum amount of income required to live on. Please be assured that we have investigated this matter and we can confirm that we are acting within section 187 of the Social Services Administration Act 1992. Full details of this act can be found on www.hmrc.gov.uk" 28.10.2012 ADDITIONAL According to this website: http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1497117; Jason JAG Law: "Taken from another website: Read the Government’s response The purpose of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 Section 187 and section 45 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 is to prevent people’s benefit money being at risk by it being assigned over to a third party in settlement of a debt. It is not intended to prohibit the application of bank charges. Bank charges are in the nature of an expense, and are incurred by the holder of the account; tax credits and benefits are payable in order to help customers meet their expenses, and as such it is legitimate for banks to deduct charges from the balance of an account held in that bank, whether the money paid into the account comes from tax credits, benefits or other sources, such as earnings." Smokeychan1: "LOL what do they think bank charges are then? Are they not a debt???" soapfan_1973: "Yes, but not a debt owed to a "third party."

Eye of Sauron logo

Dialogue 1 

8.11.2012 I put in a formal complaint about my Genesis officer, and her boss just rang to tell me they're fast-tracking me through the system, getting me work placement and fudging paperwork to cover missed deadlines. Wow! The boss was nice she remembered I'd complained before so she took me seriously this time. I feel guilty for pressuring them. I mentioned neo-fem prejudice against males in my complaint and they've crapped themselves. It depends what my CRB check says and if they play hardball back at me about it, since it is discretionary. Next issue is childcare for my son on the days I have him unless I can sort it with his mam somehow to alter our rosta. 

11.11.2012 Had a meeting with Genesis today and the bottom line is NO. for er any excuse we can find and when that doesn't work its the other excuse. The previous phone-call was a joke. 

They're going to pay my petrol to send me to carmarthen to do art therapy instead and say they'll fund me to do childcare next year. If a group of men did this to a woman there would be an inquest. This is neo-feminism LOUD AND CLEAR men do NOT do childcare. The fact that there are equally as many women who are abusive as there are men is ignored because women are dominant, superior and in control. It is a big social problem because when men act like women act, they go to jail. I have to teach my son to survive in the world he lives in which means being honest about the world we live in.

What happens in my experience is what happened with the guy my ex left me for, claiming he was "more manly" (than me). He and three of his mates then identified a ringleader of what is locally described as 'a bitch pack' and they left her her dying gratuitously as a warning to society; they are now serving life sentences for it. This is how close I am to the male response to neo-fem manipulation in Wales where I live. Nobody wants that world, nobody. At least I have an art project theme for my art therapy course now. Highly executed art is preserved and promoted as social commentary for many generations especially when it creates powerful emotional response. 

Dialogue 2 

11.11.2012 

I had a meeting with genesis today, they are going to fund me to get involved with an art group in carmarthen for this year and then do the childcare course next year. Its really difficult for men to get into childcare. Its proved that women are equally as abusive as men but because women are controlling the industry they put men through hell. We now live in a society where mens liberation is necessary. Do you know the words mysandry or misogyny? 

I won't be coming into the lessons again this year. If men treated a woman this way there would be an inquest. I know that if I go to the Welsh Assembly causing trouble about this, I would end up sidelined and discredited by women running the show; so I have to play their game. There's a reason for everything even if we don't know what it is at the time. 

Dialogue 3 

8.11.2012 

I'm back on the childcare course (again) this week at least. The abuser-disguised-as-inept-or-possibly-so-inept-it-appears-as-abusive woman is off my back :) 

11.11.2012 In class yesterday, teacher discussing Trust with regard to confidentiality. The syllabus says; "you trust an authority figure for example a doctor because of their profession." I spoke up; "I disagree! You trust because of intuition. Someone doing a job does not automatically qualify trust!' 

I am having such trouble from the system because I am a man doing childcare. Extra red tape to put me off and delay until the deadline is gone. So there in a room full of women being indoctrinated to act without thinking and to reinforce the system over common sense -it is a male who raises the point that trust is instinct, it is not a given. 

Class then woke up and talked about malpractise, networks of abuse inherent in the system eg: google HOLLY GRAIG, the difference between what the tv says about julian assange/wikileaks to what free media says about it, etc. All the feminist material that women are intuitive and men are logical has just been proved to be a load of shit. 

So there is a reason I am in the class, even if the women running the show don't want me to be there! The teacher herself is lovely she's a common sense supporter too. Meeting with genesis; they are going to fund me to get involved with "arts for wellbeing" starting January instead so I have a better foundation in art therapy before they start me again on the childcare program next year. 

Additional Info: This comes after 6 months of asking, why do I need to pay myself to do a light crb check when Genesis pay for a full crb mandatory to do childcare? Doing a light crb check is pointless and nobody else on the course (all women) had to do a light crb check first. Why am I so special? I complained about my contact to her boss and her boss response was to ignore the complaint. Now I have missed the deadlines for this year, however the boss did finally admit that asking me to do a light crb check was pointless and she can see my point. I still have not received crb check results because now there is no need for them to be made, thus saving genesis 40quid. 

First published on a facebook group 11.11.2012 where over a hundred people read it. The comments cannot be re-posted here due to copyright however they were revealing.