Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts

Sunday, 14 January 2018

Proxy Kill

Proxy Kill


"I will not hurt any student, and I will protect all learners from harm. I will remember that there is art to learning as well as science, and that caring, empathy, social, emotional and physical development are as critical as intellectual achievement. I will apply, for the benefit of each student, all available instructional supports and resources, in the knowledge and conviction that we each learn differently, and that everyone can learn." socratic-oath-for-educators



Socrates, the "father of western thinking" was forced by controlling society to drink poison for their perceived crime of corrupting youth.



0. pre-med
In the first decade of the 20th century, Snake Apple Tree wrote a serial of short stories entitled The Murder Chronicles (aka New Murder Fiction). 

It was published incomplete to www.snakeappletree.co.uk

This has nothing at all to do with;  Liang Yaosheng's works of same title or R. Barri Flowers works of same title or the-line-up's interactive fictions of same title or anybody else using the same title which quite clearly is collectively a shareware title under no formal copyright property. 

Snake Apple Tree's serial as a complete includes both the final (unpublished) chapter(s) and also other short stories not included in the published core. They were not published due to their personal nature. The serial is billed as being semi-fictionalized accounts of true stories. They are tales from the underground; official records always show very different versions of events. This is because the official versions are cover-ups by a corrupt society.


The following are chapters of the final novella (Proxy Kill) of the serial. 

IN MEMORANDUM. 




1. basis

Manufacturing a collective operational base which holds a paradigm and enforces it upon target. 
The paradigm enforces depression upon the target of such severe intensity that the target commits suicide.

Everybody says "its a shame" and enjoys their suffering of the loss of the target from the collective. 

In animal species we observe this behavior. Example, a murder of crows (collective noun for a flock of crows in English language is 'murder') will peck to death the weaker members of the flock, increasing the amount of available food scraps to scavenge for the stronger members. This maintains the health of the flock while being a bitch for the target. 


2. control

Trying to control the target. 
Enforcing a false paradigm, establishing it in the mind of zombi's as the officially endorsed collaborative agreement, the dominant narrative.
Instead of respecting nature, intuition, spirit. 
Aboriginal map of reality has three circles: the world of nature, the world of Spirits, the world of Humans. The world out of balance is the world which accepts only Humans as valid and Nature to be exploited, and dismisses the world of Spirit as make-belief.
Shaman integrate it as Truth. 

The excuse to protect 'vulnerables' from those who can and want to help.
The result is: 
Without help, the vulnerable kills him/her self.


3. Luci

Luci was 14. 
I was 28. 

I saved up and bought a Japanese fretless blue electric bass guitar. 
Luci saved up and bought a red electric fender guitar. 

The first time we met was in the street, both in the glow of yielding our tools which were finally in our possession, on that first day of ownership. 

Bang! 

There is magick in instruments. 
There is even more magick in music.
There is magick in the universe to have put this coincidence together. 

We are but cogs in an intergalactic, multi-dimensional machine the mechanics of which are far, far beyond our understanding. The very best we can hope for is to recognize some small glimpse of this, through the divine worshipful connection of, when we trust our intuition, when we let music flow through us without mind getting in the way, when we have sex. These are the three principles of divine worship.

Luci was dark and worshipped dark gods with blood and sex magic.
She had a shrine to black metal and goth. 
She had candles and spoke a language I have not heard in several incarnations. 
A young witch coming of age, wise far beyond her years and obsessed with Jungian Shadow. 

Luci and I did not have sex. 
We did play music.
We did talk about psychology. 
Luci was depressed and cutting herself deeper each time. 

I had recently finished doing counseling nvq2 and frustrated that the red-tape limitations of doing it professionally for money through the state would make any real attempt at actually fixing somebody, not possible. The girl needed emotional and mental support, she needed a hug. She needed a fuck but being only 14 in a nation which kills paedophiles and where the age of consent is 16, we did not go there. We could have and it was a potential between us. Some other lucky brat would have to sort her out that way. I proved my parental responsibility. We behaved in accordance with social conformity despite occasionally facing down natural instinct together. 

Our relationship was mostly defined by music tutor and counselor. I lent her cd's and guitar effects boxes. We both used the same software, so I taught her some of the tricks I have learned with it. It helped her to focus on creativity instead of self-destruction. Her family members who got to know me and who trusted me remarked the positive influence I was having on her. She stopped cutting so often. Her scars began to heal. 

The prejudice twats did not like me sniffing around a vulnerable minor. 
They did not like the age gap. 
They beat me up in the street. 
They knew where i lived.
I stopped visiting her. 
That was my mistake. 
She nose-dived.
She cut too deep.
She dead now. 


4. Popi

After the tragedy of Luci I traveled to get over it. 
I trusted my intuition and I went in that direction, regardless. 

I found myself in the Valley. 
From the outside, the Valley is the last retreat of free people in Britain.
It does have an internet site and it is described on there as;
"Survival lifestyle"
There are no facilities.
It is entirely based on people and people skills. 
A place where free people can go to develop skills not even known about by the city slaves and their mindless polluting conformity.  

Drink water and wash from the stream. 
Import food or grow your own. 
The Valley is surrounded by forest. 
The community is organized well enough that a daily shit-bucket collection takes your toilet from your bender and deposits it in the community compost. 
Kids born there are educated locally and not by state school. 
It is hardly Canada and the reserves, but its the closest thing to it in UK. 
Everybody knows everybody. 
Everybody knows everybody's business. 

A culture in miniature highlights the issues which all cultures face.
Politics is as rife in the Valley as it is in the city. 
It is also somewhat of a tourist venue for those curious and able to find it and get there. 
Everyone lives openly, which is to say everyone has the same STDs because with a very small population of very open minded people, liberal people gonna do what liberal people gonna do. 

Popi grew up there. 
At 15 Popi had enough. 
I heard about Popi. 

Popi a Bright in the context of the 2017 movie Bright (directed by David Ayer)
Everybody loved her. 
Popi was the most free spirit the Valley had produced, of a population who uphold being a freespirit as the ultimate Human Right and Aspiration.
My intuition screamed at me that I have to connect with her.
As soon as possible. 
I asked around.
The community protect.
People do. 

"No mate, you ain't going near our Popi."
"Ye well thanks for making me feel like a wolf after a sheep but there's more to it than that." 
"We don't know you."
I looked her square in the eye.
"I am True. You don't know Truth."

I wasn't though. Had i been True i would have gone direct to her.
My mistake was a preconception that I needed to go through other people to find her.
The Valley works its mysterious charms; to take, to give, to set its own balance.

I knew that by connecting with Popi I could set her toward a path she needed to be on, and that it had to be me because nobody else could do it. Because of the primal nature of energy and how it dances, electromagnetic. I cannot explain this without sounding crazy to the crazy people. 

I had seen the girls spirit and connected with her in dream. Because brights stand out in the darkness and I have stared into that darkness so much that I can see the motions of brights, their colours which have meanings, where and how they flow, and ebb. I saw the imminence of her ebb.

The valley closed its cultural gates against me. 

I saw her ebb extinguish and I cried. 

Later, i heard that Popi had killed herself. 

Those who knew her explained, she had been trying to get away from the valley and its controlling culture. She had nowhere to go. 

I returned to my empty flat in the city which was a gate to so much of the multiverse. 

Another light gone out. 


5.Toni

Soon after that I encountered a young teenage boy crying on the back doorstep of a church at the back of my apartment. I asked him whats up? Sat next to him. Talked. He opened up to me. 

"Social services has forced me into adoption with a woman who does not feed me and hits me." 

He showed me the bruising.

"The teachers don't care. The police don't want to get involved. So I have run away. I don't know where to go." 

I could not take a vulnerable minor into my apartment alone without putting myself at risk. i do not operate that way. 

I was returning to my apartment to eat because I had not eaten for a day or two. Neither had Toni.
I suggested we buy food from the shop, which we did. Moving the body in walking is a step toward going forward, motion, holistic metabolic system regulating itself toward balance, starts the healing. He stopped crying and had a goal now, albeit temporary and small but the food would help.
He is eating my food, technically not my food but food I had bought. My energy is going into him with it. His configuration would shift and align with mine. This is how energy works. Idiots do not see it this way.
We discussed his friends and their parents being home, people who know him and can help. 
He was missing the hell out of his old friends, his old school, his old life. He had been banned form seeing any of them by his foster mother.
We visited his friend in another part of town. He was grateful that I knew the route. 
His friends parents were out and I did not want to drop him off there, it felt bad.
We visited another of his friends in another part of town. 
We borrowed the phone to call Toni's mother and she told him to fuck off.
The friend phoned his own mother and arranged Toni could stay the night there. 
She likes Toni and knows him well.
This felt good. The healing Toni needs even if only for one night.
I did not know what else to do.
Had I called the authorities, the police &/or social services, it would have betrayed Toni's trust for me and it would have caused him more problems. 
He would have run away again with nowhere to go.
He would lose trust in other people and his ability to trust others would be damaged.
Shaman are healers. We are advanced at emotional psychology and at psychology. 
We do our best to do the right thing.
I did not see Toni again but I did see a few of his friends sometime later who told me that he had gone back to his foster mother's and they hadn't heard of him since.


6. This list continues. 

Many more examples. People would rather drive their kids to suicide than allow a shaman to heal them. This is UK 21st century. I do not regard any of this to be my failing because I tried damn hard to prevent those who I could see are going to do it, from doing it. Everyone who was binding them to the path of self destruction did everything they could to get rid of me by labeling me as the danger element, as an unknown, as a potential risk. 

There is a beautiful tradition that by remembering to others the lesson of a persons life, is to honour that life.
 






©2018 Ordo Octopia

Friday, 12 October 2012

Read Him His Rights

What the corporate policy enforcers SAY are your rights are: “You do not have to say anything but it may harm your defence if you do not mention now, anything you later rely on in court. Anything you do say will be given in evidence.” Lets analyse this. The very first thing you are told AFTER you are under arrest is that ‘you do not have to say anything’. It is total logic that if you are at any time not under arrest then you have more rights than when you are under arrest. Therefore if you are not under arrest you are not obliged to say anything at all to a policeman, ever. They will tell you that this makes them suspicious; they can arrest you on suspicion only tell you that you have a right not to say anything. ‘but it may harm your defence’ MAY is confusing legal speak. It is legalese and does not as commonly misperceived actually mean ‘possibly’. It is granting permission. What it means to the policeman and in court is literally; ‘I give myself permission to…’ ‘may… your DEFENCE’ Thus assuming that you are on the defensive by the policeman giving himself authority to be on the offensive. The interesting interplay between two definitions of the word ‘offense’ here, however during an arrest is probably not the best time to be analyzing that particular issue. ‘Anything you do say will be given in evidence’ Yes, this is where you say “I AM UNDER DURESS” which destabilizes the arrest because it denies giving authority to that arrest. We are policed by consent. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oAwnw-mLNs&feature=related If a policeman asks you “Do you understand” he does not mean ‘Do you comprehend?'. It is more legalese. It means 'Do you stand beneath my authority' and if you say “yes" then you have given him the power above you. A maxim of Law is that we are all equal under Law. If you say “no” then you retain your real Rights. Rights are Rights. They are automatically yours by Right. That is what it means. The only possible time your Rights do not apply is if you are being abused or if someone has tricked you into giving away your rights. There is a law (I will have to check up on exactly what it says) that if you have been tricked into giving your rights away, the result is void because the real rights remain your rights. For example if I sign a contract agreeing to allow somebody to kill me and that person kills me, they are not exempt from being incarcerated for murder. Rights are definitive. Now it is time to analyse our REAL Rights which is NOT what the policeman say are your rights. This is your homework assignment. Despite Rights being What Is Right, if you do not speak up in defense of your rights then you have none. If you do not know your Rights then you are a push-over. If I spell it out here for you, you will forget it by tomorrow. If you put time and effort into educating yourself, you will deserve your Rights. Meanwhile let us explore a finishing topic; Oath of Constable: “I swear to serve the Queen with fairness integrity diligence and impartiality upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people and that I will to the best of my power cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.” The wording is confusing in that to ‘discharge all the duties thereof’ technically means ‘to let go of’ / ‘release from’. Therefore the oath is a promise both to do something and to remove obligation to do it. What the? I have not yet ascertained the legal meaning of discharged. One would think that it means the opposite of being charged (with an offense). Not that the corporate policy enforcers nor parliament care about such matters, however the Office of Fair Trading states that; "It is unfair to communicate, in whatever form, in an unclear, inaccurate or misleading manner." It would be a very different sort of community were they to apply this to themselves. Additional: Names, Castes & Wiki on Egalitarianism To claim ownership of a name of a legal fiction person (a name on a birth certificate) puts you under governmental policy enforcement jurisdiction. This is why a policyman requests your name. A name that has been registered (register means to 'transfer title ownership of deeds) means that the name is crown copyright and therefore in truth you would be committing theft to claim it as your own. A distinction must be made between the name of a piece of paper (a legal person) and the name of a flesh and blood living being with or without a soul (a natural person). This distinction IS made and recognised by courts, by legislation. A name that does not exist on the database of registered names indicates a living being who is bound by Law but not bound by legislation. "A Statute is given the force of a Law by consent of the governed." and I do not consent to be governed. My name is Commonly Known As somebody, it is not Mr. somebody. Mr somebody is a paperwork. Living beings make paperwork. Paperwork does not make living beings. See the hierarchy? The Common Law of our Ancestors also known as the Law of the Land is easy to abide by and remember;Do not steal from, trick or harm anybody; and Keep the Peace. If you live within that then you have not broken any laws. Everything else is statutory regulations legislated by parliament, who are empowered to do so by the monarchy, and is 'legal' rather than 'lawful'. You only have to abide by all of that if you consent to the paperwork (legal person) being you (the natural person). The authorities might not like this approach, they assume that everyone is a legal fiction and anyone who is evasive about it is likely to be persecuted hard. This is because the deception has corrupted so many peoples minds that they cannot recognise common sense. It is a money industry sworn to protect itself. The following is some quick research I did in Wikipedia: “Human rights are commonly understood as "inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being."[1] Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.[2] The doctrine of human rights in international practice, within international law, global and regional institutions, in the policies of states and in the activities of non-governmental organizations, has been a cornerstone of public policy around the world. The idea of human rights[3] states, "if the public discourse of peacetime global society can be said to have a common moral language, it is that of human rights." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights “Natural and legal rights are two types of rights theoretically distinct according to philosophers and political scientists. Natural rights are rights not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable. In contrast, legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by the law of a particular political and legal system, and therefore relative to specific cultures and governments. A legal right can be enforced in courts of law against another who has infringed the right. The idea of human rights is also closely related to that of natural rights; some recognize no difference between the two and regard both as labels for the same thing, while others choose to keep the terms separate to eliminate association with some features traditionally associated with natural rights.[3] Natural rights, in particular, are considered beyond the authority of any government or international body to dismiss. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important legal instrument enshrining one conception of natural rights into international soft law. Natural rights were traditionally viewed as exclusively negative rights[4], whereas human rights also comprise positive rights.[5]” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights DISCLAIMER: This document is not in any way intended as antagonism. It is intended as exploration of situations involving Rights and corporate policy enforcers, and for educational purposes; and without ill will, frivolity nor vexation. All rights reserved. COMMENTS PLEASE WELCOME first published on facebook 2.9.2012 Associated Links: http://www.mckenziefriend.com http://www.hmpbritain.co.uk/police-are-there-as-public-servants/ http://www.thelioness.co.uk/POLICEDBYCONSENT.php

Thursday, 11 October 2012

the Hive Mind, ch23 Freedom, by Veronica: otf Chapman

Chapter 23 The Hive Mind We must get out of the habit of falling into 'the Hive Mind Trap' constantly and consistently. Almost, it seems, with every breath we take. Perhaps one of the best ways of expressing the Hive Mind is by example. When asked; "Why do you do that?", a Hived Mind response is: "It's what we do now. That's the way we do it." End of story. End of conversation. End of discussion. End of argument. No... it's not the end of the discussion! Nothing like! The original question is not answered by that response. However, it is generally the only answer you'll get from some Organic Robot who has a Hive Mind. In other words thats a Hive Mind answer. But there are also Hive mind questions. For example: "How can we do this officially?", is that kind of question. The question should have been: "What's the best way to do this honorably?" I mean, what has 'officially' got to do with anything? The Hive Mind is ingrained into our psyche due to the indoctrination we suffer during childhood. It comes from our parents and schooling. It comes from these sources because they were similarly indoctrinated - as opposed to being properly educated - during their own childhoods. "What would the neighbours think?" was a perennial favourite of my own mother. I used to tell her; "I don't give a shit what they think. That's their problem, not mine." (I can only presume I was born a rebel). I hated school... due to its Hive mind attitude. Although I couldn't put my finger on it at the time. I just knew it was all wrong 'somehow'. A builder can make a house. A house cannot make a builder. The builder is 'above' the house. A Human Being can make a Law. The Law cannot make a Human Being. The Human Being is 'above' the Law. It has to be that way. And the Law has already been made. Centuries ago. Although there were attempts beforehand, a major boost, to codify it properly, occurred in 1215. When we are in Hive Mind mode we are not 'above' anything. Our mentality is 'below' the situation. We are looking upwards, and wondering: "How to do this officially?" We are looking for 'guidance from above'. The correct attitude is to use our Common Sense, and to take an honorable course of action. Then our mentality is right where it should be: Above the situation at hand. I'm often told that many people want 'to be led'. This argument can - to some extent - be countered by wondering whether or not their childhood indoctrination has left them in that state? And whether or not, if they had been educated instead of indoctrinated during that period of their lives, perhaps they would not let the government (and its propaganda arm, called 'the Media') do all their thinking for them.? But I'm obviously out on a limb with that answer. Simply because I'm unable to prove it, of course. My Common Sense tells me... but that's all. But my Common Sense also tells me that - even if the vast majority would not want me to be led by the nose had they been properly educated - then there is still the possibility that some would want it that way. Ok. Fine. Let them be sheep, and led by the nose - by some nannying Big Brother style Government. But don't include me in that, sunshine! Because i don't accept being treated as a 'lowest common denominator'. And, i believe, there are millions of us who object to being treated like that. And we have a voice. And that's what this book is all about.