TimeCode Node Event 1616022016

Today we had an important Node Event as we measure syncretic Time.

24 hour Clock / Hour Minute Day Month Year

16.16 on 16.02.2016

16 16 16 02 20 16

=8+8 : 8+8 on 8+8 02 20 8+8

We have to wait for a year and a day for another one of those.

16 = 8x2 whereas next year;
17=1+7=8 This is why the cycle is numerically interesting, the same symbols repeat, in different places, doing different things.

It wasn't the same on 14.2nd @ 14.14 2014 (2+5=7) and
it wont be the same on 18th 2nd @ 18.18 2018 (2+9=11)
However, the 2015 and 2016 and 2017 trinity all interelate because they ripple in ring harmonics around todays Node. 
because the 2015 (2+6=8) and 2016 (2+2x8) and 2017 (2+8) numbers represent open and close of a vortex, that trusty old 8 in there; the one day in the middle of which is a powerful node.
These events are each a year and a day apart so there are also other Nodes on that odd day, half a year away. 

There is still some maths and some explaining to do.

See NSG (Number Sync Grid): A maths riddle posed here (see link) hinges on the 8; once having answered the question on the link, divide your answer by 2 and see what happens.


You begin to recognize visually, through the balance of number, the importance not only of mirroring the past and future or left and right sides of the central core (the moment ‘now’) but also how the numbers indicate significant trajectories through the ascending system we use of digit-digit : digit-digit measurable time on the 24 hour clock.


Numerology Codex

1 = direct path MERCURY
2 = polarityVENUS
3 = stability EARTH
4 = axis MARS
5 = diversity JUPITER
6 = exit from lower circuit SATURN
7 = key, ascent (through layers) URANUS
8 = infinity (perpetuation cycles) NEPTUNE
9 = freedom (from the cycle) PLUTO
0 = wholeness, completion PLANET X / SUN

I have included the solar systems planetary associations AS ARE (it used to be very different, back then we were using a different codex so the old assignments are irrelevant to this calendar).

I mentioned there is still some explaining to do.

Note that I am comparing 2 systems here;
first by splitting the Century digits into two so it can be overlaid on the 24 hour Clock digits XX:XX and
second by adding all of the Year digits into a single digit.


Hour Minute Day Month Year

4:4 6 = (13:13 on 13th 2nd 2013)
5:5 7 = (14:14 on 14th 2nd 2014)
6:6 8 = (15:15 on 15th 2nd 2015)
7:7 9 = (16:16 on 16th 2nd 2016)
8:8 10 (=1) = (17:17 on 17th 2nd 2017)
9:9 11 (=2) =  (18:18 on 18th of 2nd 2018)
10:10 12 (=3) = 19:19 on 19th 2nd 2019)

Q: Why is it significant that this is measured from 2nd month?
A: Because the second month is 02 and the year is 20XX.
That is the point by which we measure this balance, this trajectory.

To measure it from the 1st month and the 3rd month changes the trajectory.
1st month : 20XX =  01:20— = 3 (stability)
2nd month : 20XX = 02:20— = 4 (axis)
3rd month : 20XX =  03:20— = 5 (versatility)

We are measuring Vortex, windows which stream through and change their shape during their journey. We measure them at and from key significant points as measured on the TimeCode we call 24 hour clock of the 365 day year calendar system unique to planet Earth.

16.16 on 16.02.2016

= 7:7 on 7.2.27 OR 7.2.9 OR 9.9 (9+9=18=9)
(standard numerology system of adding all non-single numbers until they conform to between 1 and 9)

=8+8 : 8+8 on 8+8 . 02 . 20 8+8
(dualism/polarity system based on century and month indicators)

When you know that 8 = infinity and 2 = duality (and 9 = freedom) you have some serious concepts mirroring, balancing, opening and expanding from this particular precise number so far as trajectories measure vortex within the mathematical grid.

You probably do not think in this way about numbers. 

Multi-dimensionally, abstractly until you recognize the trajectories conforms to patterns.
Then we assign these Paths and Patterns to Events in our lives which occur simultaneously with them, the important Node Events. It is those which we are keeping track of.

Further Research

Auriglyphica (incomplete web version A and link to version B)
DIGIT and LEXIQ (software codex utilizing mirrored duality system)

Of further and related interest: WTF3

Coding

This post is less an afterthought from my blog on HeadCrash vs SnowCrash and more a lifelong frustration which I have never shared with people because people generally don't care enough about the impact it had on my life to give a shit.

Coding

At the age of Eight I sat in front of the console and I wondered why I was phasing in and out of perceptions, self-belief and ability. Some moments I stared at the screen, had focus and knew exactly what to type. Other moments, I was not sure what I was doing. I realised that I was sensitive to some type of unknown cause, resulting in my perceptions shifting wildly between self-belief and ability to do something such as code a computer, or the disbelief in myself. I contemplated the waves of beliefs coming through the wall from the classroom beyond, each individual persuading other individuals to share their perception and I saw this as colours in the air overlaid on the infrastructure like lava-lamps on a wireframe.

The teacher came out of the classroom and told me that the other kids had been telling her I was not coding, I was playing games. The teachers was disappointed in me because she thought I had conned her into allowing me to play computer games by pretending to be a computer whizz kid capable of coding.

I told her the truth; I had been hacking the games on the school computers floppy disk to learn how to put them together because there were things in them which I did not know how to do, an that this was possible only because I was good enough at coding to know how to do it. I did not intend to steal anyones copyright but the fact is that in BBC Basic there is simply one way to do things as sleekly as possible which works, which is the sensible optimal way to do it. My confusion was that the games on the school floppy disks were not coded that way; they were coded with lots of extra lines that made no sense and i was changing them to do it my way because I wanted to see if I was right in how I was thinking about this. So far my alterations had made no difference whatsoever to the gameplay. BBC’s were too basic to be able to tell if I had improved the processing speed and other considerations.

I did not explain any of the above very well because of the pressure the teacher was putting on to me to answer her question and the waves of suspicion she was projecting onto me that I was tricking her. I replied; ‘A bit of both but that is how it works.’ She interpreted this as guilt on my part and that was the last time I ever saw the school computer.

I had not got a chance to show her the three thousand plus lines of hand-written code I had been making into my notepads for my text-based adventure. I did not get a chance to show her the vdu games I had written already from my own code on disks that my grandad had given me, during the time I had been cramming in as much learning as possible on the days when I had stayed at his house across the river Severn in England during school holidays. I had showed some of the kids that, but their response was to get jealous and tell the teacher that I was doing nothing but playing games and so evidently she believed them that I was lying and had tricked her.

My reputation after that was one of being a clever liar with no actual skill in coding. Not only this but having waved the school computer under my nose and permitted me to code on it for a few sessions during break time before the other kids came in and took over what I was trying to do so they could play games on it, which I felt a social duty to allow them to do because computers were new back then and none of them had ever seen a BBC micro, the school had only just got one themselves.

My mother threw my notepads out because the school had a word with her that this whole coding thing was a scam, and that was the end of my career as a coder. When my dad brought an Amiga home several years later I started to learn the several programs which it was capable of running, only to discover that software security had tightened up a lot since then and that the actual books I needed to learn how to code in these more complicated languages were more expensive than my parents were wiling to purchase for my education.

Then the whole world outside the professional industries went over to PC’s. In a bookshop I had a look through the PC languages and came to realise that they were created by a psychopath. While there was a lot of logical application in them, for example using particular symbols to refer to particular functions, the arrangement of these was either haphazard or according to a very twisted perception which I did not enjoy forcing my mind into the shape of, because it was psychotic. I anticipated that perhaps the mind who generated this did not know it was creating a vortex channeling into a particular paradigm through which some psychopath operated; actually understanding this syntax caused psychopathy. An alternate format would be less psychotic but by then; the future of the industry was already sold on fast-practicality at the cost of humanity. As a child I had no way to express this instinctual awareness from the study of code; what I was saying would have sounded like crazy talk to the adults who I had stopped trusting already. Much later I learned that Bill Gates who had pioneered this particular code is investing millions of dollars into Agenda21 the depopulation of the planet, proving what I had said all along; that microsoft’s programming languages were created by a psychopath.

Nobody cares about my opinion so I went home and watched Tron yet again, wondering how different things could have been had I not been actively discouraged by the adults with my natural talent at software programming because they had already written me off as a clever liar and destroyed all evidence that I had ever written my own games in the first place. I tried to explain that the precision focus required to be a good coder is so concise that it is a very different way of thinking than lying, and why would I want to lie anyway? My interests are in being a coder. Words which fell on deaf ears. I learned very young that the reason I like coding is because it is something pure, and the adults of the past generation are far from pure because otherwise they would have been able to see where I was coming from and not spread lies about my objectives. That is how intelligent people are mistreated in Wales; with suspicion and then actively persecuted, their creativity destroyed by people with less sincerity.

So I was forced to study art instead of computers and therefore the industry standard Macs instead of dodgy-mentality of PC’s. Thirty years later and only now is a company starting to release a computer product (raspberry pi) designed to teach kids how to code from the same age which I had been coding, before personal computers even existed as a normality. I was lucky that my grandfathers job necessitated him to own one and be writing his algorithmic codes for the company for which he worked. I am still very aware that the organic structure of a child's mind, growing along the streamline of a software code's functional sincerity; is vulnerable to being corrupted toward amplifying that psychotic format which the PC codes create.

this album reminds me of mad professor studio techniques

A Drama Sketch

Reaching Out For That From Which We Are Trying To Escape

A commentary on millennial society, done of the ancient prose

©2016 snakeappletree

  

If ever there was needed a word for a concept, this would be it.

The following script is painfully extracted of a larger scene, 

for your scrutiny.

The title applies equally as well to so many other stories, and yet;

this humble offering more than suffices to express and suggest the most.

_______

Her: “Nah, he’s a pain in the arse. I have to do this whole ‘immortal beloved’ act when we are together. He’s caught up in it too it’s a dogma from his family history. I was hoping to be able to break him out of it, neither of us really want to play that role we simply want to fuck like monkeys but cleansing someone spiritually at that depth before fucking and getting caught upon its grid is going to take a lot of work. So I might have to let him go. It will break him unless he can overcome the dogma which is what is causing him all the pain I found so attractive in him in the first place. What to do?”

Friend: “I will go and see what he has to say about it.”

_______

Him: “She’s a bitch. She can see something in me that I cannot see in myself and I need her to help me by being honest and explaining it to me. Instead she looks way, cannot hold my eye which is why I am losing trust of her, it feels like she has strong instincts to move on, that she is looking for someone else, I am not who she is meant for.”

Friend: “Meant for? You believe in all that? And that you do not have your own free will? I never had you down for a fatalist.”

Him: “She represents freedom from the invisible chains which earth me. That is why I find her so attractive. She thinks I am going to chain her too. She knows that she needs the stability of it. When we fuck and I earth her and she sets me free, it’s a really good balance between us. But it is neither of our natures to keep that balance for long before we revert to ourselves. We need each other when we are apart. It’s a question of for how long can we stay apart before the pain of needing each other calls us back and we end up fucking for security again, compared with making the decision to jump and free ourselves of each other and move on. Before it becomes too painful and makes too much of a mess.”

Friend: “I will go and see what she has to say about it.”

_______

Her: “It has all got confusing. I should never have spoken with our friend about it, keeping our secret private life to ourselves would have been better. Do you think we can repair the rift we caused by mixing somebody else' attention into our private relationship?”

Him: “I found that it helped talking about us with somebody else. I was able to say things that I needed to say to get a clear view of it, but which had to be said in such a way that I do not know how to say it to you without causing confusion. Does that make sense?”

Her: “That makes perfect sense, it is exactly the same for me also. Talking about us helps but I did not want to hurt you.”

Him: “So should we move on or are we strong enough to tell each other now we have had a practice at it with someone else?”

Her: “Finding the right words. Well I am afraid of devoting myself to you entirely although another part of me wants nothing else but to be yours forever.”

Him: “It is exactly the same for me also. Deciding to sacrifice all of the alternate possible futures that might happen, because…”

Her: “Because we want each other so much that none of that would be as good nor as real anyway.”

Him: “That is exactly how it is.”

Her: “For both of us.”

_______

Friend: "And so it seems my role to take the center stage, for a moment while the lovers are away to attend their desire. By breaking our fourth wall I re-present to you our tale of liberation from a grid; projected upon the world by all those whose ancestral minds control their living feelings. We together learn that Love's true path can flow through every heavy heart; to bring about unveiling. This rite we call un-viling. Let it be a guide for all, lest dogma reign. This said; a curtain call, hides sunlight behind rain. I bid you to the good night, smiling." 

_______

ACT TWO

Is completely unnecessary, and yet it proves the point, is fundamental to the tale;
But only if you look at it from one certain way

Her: "No no! I changed him, I took away his masculinity, I took away his inner-anxiety and now he is as I was, free! But what of me?"

Him: "I assure you love that everything is stable. Here, we are together, you need not search for we are wed as nature intended. Am I still not enough for you? And gods i hope to be!"

Her: "Your words are meaningless and pathetic! Your ego need had caught me on your spike. I would be better free!"

Him: "But what of love? What of our sharing the pleasure we both sought? What of our future that we may repeat our blessing infinitely?"

Her: "But what of freedom and the world? I need both, you see; a steady perch and wings to fly, I need to feel free."

Him: "How can it be my own fault that to chase a star I fall, to offer everything she asks, is still not enough to sate a womans heart? Is it my inadequacy or her greed which ruins the day?"

Friend: "Ah my friends, with welcome marriage You find me, I was about to call the night. And now it seems once more I must set things to right."

Her: "Put down your mask, friend if that be what you are. With sun on one half your face and the other night, I cannot tell you apart!"

Him: "But that is his purpose, you called yourself to bring him here between us as a glue, has become a wedge for playing on fears."

Her: "Is this true?"

Him: "Would you believe in me?"

Her: "I do!"

Friend: "Then I must have you both, presenting as I do the decisive line, I am the world and all its complex distractions to stray you from your love!"

Her: "I age! And with it pain."

Him: "Come safe within my wing, before we ruin everything!"

Her: "No! You are as bad as him!" 

Friend: "It is too late. The fourth wall has been broke and now the world has been let in."

Him: "Some friend you are! Look what you have done!" 

Her: "And now I see the truth you hid from me! You are not the one!"

Friend: "I offer everything."

Her: "Everything but him!"

Him: "Without you both, I will be the strongest of us all!"

Her: "You will fade into time as a distant memory." 

Him: "Your hate for me, yet passion only moments ago in whose breathe we are both still fresh."

Friend: "And will be for all of time, a love so pure and strong cannot be broke, and this I test."

Her: "You test me to destruction, fiend! No friend of mine are you!"

Friend: "From lovers to anothers arms so soon, take note, it's true."

Him: "Be gone, fiend. And you! Return to me that we may taste the freedom we alone know."

Friend: "Tis true, your freedom is a thing I cannot know, and seek myself to find."

Him: "Surely since you are everything, that freedom is within you?"

Her: "He is not everything, for he is not you."

Him: "Then we have passed the test."

Friend: "You have. Now rest. For night comes late today."

Her: "And so too the dawn."

Him: "And so too the dawn. Away!"

_______

Friend: "Can you believe the petty drama of the roles we play? So many times, so many guises, all our hearts to know or stray. And so you drink the dogma now yourselves, having let into the dance of something pure, tangled it and dirtied it for sure, as the years ahead will show, whether those two make it as a couple wed, or no. Drinking this I ask you, are we still ahead of time, or hath the ancient  dogma caught into your hearts sublime?"

_______

Art And Divinity

What I Did With A Fine Art Honours Degree

I understood one day, that the things toward which I aspired to be, which I struggled so hard over; other people were doing it so much better than I could achieve, so much more fluidly and naturally, that I was trying to be the wrong thing, something I wasn’t and instead it would be much healthier for me simply to be myself. So I quit doing all of the wrong things. I gave up making art under the hope that the pressure to make art I had inherited from my fathers influence would leave me. It did not.That pressure is a constant thing, a drive which I cannot ever seem to satisfy. It hurts. The beatings I got for not confirming to his desire that I be Van Gogh to his Da Vinci in later years i came to terms with that it was childhood abuse, that he was psychotic and i was his victim. This understanding did not get rid of the inner tension. I cannot paint without feeling a wall of pain. I cannot make art without feeling...

...and in a higher plane I would be writing the words, immune to all of that, the aspiration which he projected upon me. Instead I am honest, the more accurate word is blocked up and stifled, there is for me no liberation in making art, only disappointment that it does not turn out not better than it is.

Only the process of … it feels like moving my arms through glass, shapes and patterns with the bones between my elbow and wrist, amplifying this energy, the creativity, not through my and to me and into the canvas but deflected directed away, syphoned and pouring into him, drank up by my father. The greatness of leaving wonderful imagery in the world after my death as a gift to the world, as an attempt toward history longevity, a sign of my passing through life; this bullshit is irrelevant, my truing as a shaman taught me to detach. I understood why the successful transmigrant Egyptian kings had their own faces chiselled away from the carvings on walls, it was to protect their passing and free themselves from attachments to the past.

Painting is old, a stifling musty link between the fluidity of an evolving self later in time, pinpointed to a moment, a portal through which observers may syphon that creative energy. It is not a gift to the world from my soul but a method by which others can tap into us and drink us. I learned this thankfully before I had made too many works of visual art. What happened to the ones I did create? Stolen if they are any good, I did not receive fair investment for them, nobody paid me to be an artist I did not make a living from it. My creativity was stolen by those who would drink my lifeblood if they could. I chose to avoid that entire circuit of people. My fathers bitter envy of a talent i did not genuinely possess, projected onto me and my fathers distaste for my life choice not to create art, which to me seemed pointless. There is one other thing; one other reason I chose not to make art.

I could not afford to pay a model. No sexy female agreed to pose for me, when I asked they heard instead of a request to pose for study painting, the words ‘I want to have sex with you but am a liar so I am trying to trick you by this device’. I lost prestige over it, and offering to pay they thought I accused them of prostitution. So I made up imagery from imagination instead of study observation. And when you tap into imagination, strange things happen. For one, imagination is not fantasy and make-belief. It is a way to access that which is real on other planes. I made some paper mach dolls and for three years myself and a friend went through a series of adventures involving people who looked identical to the paper mache dolls, people we did not know existed before the dolls were made. I made some drawings of characters in situations and then those situations manifested as lived events for myself and my friends. I showed wherever I could; the evidence to the people involved and they got very frightened because they could see of themselves the raw power of art to tap into the otherworld. I do not know if cause made effect or if effect made cause, whether linear time has anything to do with it in activating an event by making a picture or if merely that I was drawing something which would have occurred had i drawn it or not. The language offers the clue: we draw water from a well.

When art comes through an artist, that artist is drawing water from a well and others tap into it. However the vampires I cohabit this society with tap not the source, they have no ability to do that. Instead they tap the artist who is channeling the source through attunement to it, and happens to record a symbol of that well onto a canvas. I do not want to be tapped, I have barely sufficient energy for myself.

I studied Primitivism in university and from that an interest in shamanism, discovering for what use the African effigies were put originally before they ended up in European art galleries exhibited not as tools but as ornaments, inspiring early 20th century art movements and philosophies. I engrossed myself in that but underlaying all of it, I became a spiritist. Then the same vampires who had stolen my work and forced me to paint against my instincts, decided that a clairaudient medium is technically ‘hearing voices’ and so I was misdiagnosed as schizophrenic. I do have post traumatic stress disorder, yes but I am not schizophrenic. The misdiagnosis fits the model of reality projected onto me by my father that I am Van Gogh to his Da Vinci and the more I complain against it, the more those complaints are twisted into being evidence of a schizotypal disorder; for how dare I disagree with his ego and control game?

So I disowned my family and attempted to have a reassessment. No mental health worker can agree to help me because they are afraid they might lose their jobs over it. These are people more interested in money and personal gain than in truth and reality. Not one of them has a spiritual bone in their body although they do hide behind the face value mask of calling themselves christians. I ask them to live by the teachings of christ and they fail, they describe themselves then as church rather than christian. I am so gratefully pagan to be able to see reality for what it is instead of having to see through the eyes of those who cannot connect with the divine flow of the creative source.

And now when I do, I do so through words instead of pictures for although they say that a picture tells a thousand words, there is a safety valve. These are my words inside your mind, and I am free from that connection because I am controlling your mind, not the other way around. With a visual picture on canvas, I am being stared at and looked through with no way to protect myself. You can see the difference clearly. In truth it is not quite so clear-cut a difference for all gates are two-way gates. Yet I find more personal safety in writing because of the dedication it takes on your part as reader, the focus you are using to read this and make sense of the meaning here; I am harnessing that focus for myself and using it to sustain myself. Do not be afraid that I am writing this way, be grateful for a lesson in how all things work.

All things from the food you eat energizing the grower or the shop from whom you bought it, to the clothes that you wear who vibrate energetically to the vibration of whatever deity your clothes conform to. This is what it is to live as a slave, self-aware and aware of the jungle of energies around us. We are no longer the primal savage, free in itself to exist with liberty. We are tamed by contracts done in ancient times by our ancestors whose dealings with the external macrocosm and the many demons which sustain it, have made the world the way it is. Every brick of the dwelling you inhabit, inhibits your flow. There is no freedom in the material density of time-mass. There is freedom only when we personally connect within to the divine flow of creation. And for me this is words rather than paint. For you, I hope that you find your own way and that you are not inhibited by the vampires who drink your energy through your arts.

There is a fundamental important secret here: I give this information to you for free, and in doing so, both of us are free of any energy tithe between us, because no leech-demons of trade are invoked. Were I to use commerce to share this information, we would all pay toward that deity and there would be muddied complexity between us. Know this is why old books and paintings fade to yellow with age; it is not age measured in time but by how much they have been drained of their life. You might want to contemplate why true artists starve in garrets while wealthy artists have material plenty but very little other than accumulated skill to cover the lack of their own divinity. 

JeremyMann

This artist is amazing! 

JEREMY MANN

TimeCode

This blog is a response to Sekhmet Speaks videoblog HERE also follows my struggles attempting to explain the information I have toward the saturn-moon matrix thing which Ickes latest book gives a fraction of the information about but does not include all of it, hence his conclusion is doom-saying and hostile toward a structure which to my understanding has been placed to protect us from ourselves as a necessary part of species evolution.

How “natural” would we be if we were chaotic and not aligned as a global species, toward the same cohesion? Perhaps a better question is, how functional would we be? Could we function at all? 

If every bodies bio-rhythm and mental flow was not gridded to the same grid, we would all be individual and unique. We would mutate, physically, emotionally, mentally, we would diversify rapidly. All of that “junk dna” would become active and change our physical appearance away from the human form, it would change our emotions and how our minds work. You know how different are the different animal species? We would become more like that. The animals would also mutate into different forms from how the moon grid is setting them to be. Our 13 cycle biorhythms and 12 cycle minds (which creates a painful friction, we call ‘being out of balance’) would change; not only to stop using the 13:20 moon cycles but also to stop using the 12:60 satanic timecode.

There is an ancient legend that once, all the faye species had to protect themselves from the emerging global domination by homo sapiens, so they went into the human form themselves. There is another legend from the Mayan about the 6th Age. True connection with Self to the level where we return to our true form and bring that into the dimension of time-mass, wearing our spirit bodies as physical bodies, being those shapes, accessing those dimensions which the homo sapiens form has latent ability for: it means a change on the scale we can barely comprehend. We would barely recognise one another. We would have no mutual language nor common frames of reference. We would cognate data so diversely as to be ineffective at collaboration. In many ways we can barely achieve it even now while gridded.

We still have racial prejudice because other peoples skin is a different colour. When the global 6th age occurs, people will start looking wildly different. We have basic concepts, from visionary writers: Tolkiens Lord of the Rings where different species co-exist, elves goblins trolls humans dwarfs. Clive Barkers Weaveworld in which no two individuals are alike in ability nor shape - that is closer to it. Our bloodlines contain the latent mutations. 

The current generations are being educated into the divergence between werewolf’s and vampires through the illuminate medium of hollywood. Most people could not cope with watching a street full of so many different types. And the requirements of those types to maintain their wholistic stability. For example, some people are diabetic and need insulin injections. Some divergent 6th Agers will require fresh blood to sustain themselves, while others will produce bio-chemical commodities they will be hunted for because of the street value. 

Life in the 20th/21st centuries is already chaotic beyond our ability to cope with hence requirement for militia policing the planet albeit toward agenda’s most people regard as corrupt, they at least conform toward the notion of stability. When  a percentage of the population sprout wings, learn they can time-jump, teleport, start fires with their eyes, heal by kissing, piss liquid gold, cause everyone who see’s them to fall in love, send out shockwaves which knock people out, well the list is endless. Physical mutations as we come into our own true power, perhaps we are all going to be able to shapeshift, it will undermine the infrastructure of control completely, we will have total chaos on the planet. 

The moon grid is there to protect us from this until we are all ready to cope with it. Some people are greedy and desire it before proving their responsibility of so much evolutionary empowerment. The world was flooded with spiritual disciplines, paths to help us achieve that responsibility, for those who are proving worthy of even knowing about what the future will contain. A small amount will be attained by genetic modification but most of it will happen naturally when the moon-grid is shut off, which it will be, when the time is right. More than this, as a part of the grid and the way that it works, souls are going around in circles, transmigrating from lifetime to lifetime, reincarnated to learn the lessons over and over again. 

At the moment a wave of frustration because it feels like a prison to us. We have to accept that which we cannot change and in doing so, a process starts within us, a process toward becoming more responsible for our actions. We cannot exist as dragons until we prove that we are not going to burn the world with our flames. It is timed so that we will all arrive at more or less the same time, there will be several waves of incarnating into the timezone of the 6th age after the grid comes down. We should be trusting that grid is there to protect us all instead of hating it. It was placed there to help us. 

We are only just beginning to come to terms with the scale of evolution and what we are involved in here and it is not a horror story, it is something amazing. We are beginning to taste what we truly are. A necessary part of this is realisation of self, and realisation of self comes along with responsibility of self. Simply because you feel righteous in your belief that you deserve to be fully all that you are, does not mean you are ready to be all that you are. The grid will only come down when you are able to choose not to reflexively kill a bunch of people simply because you are having a bad day. That is one of the gates you have to pass through to access it. Otherwise, you will go around in another loop. 

The incentive we have to stabilise ourselves so that we are able to leave the grids, is that if we do not do so now, by doing a lot of self-work this generation; we will miss an important window and have to go around the whole cycle again and through a worse purgatory than this lifetime might sometimes seem to be. That is a tension lever. The incentives are built in. Self glorification is another trap which we have to overcome. There are so many. 

Only when we are pure enough, streamlined enough, by proving we are wise and responsible; only then can we slip through without being reincarnated back into the matrix. The process of being totally ready for the next stage is what prepares us for it. They do not want monsters in heaven, and so they set these gates. The self-work we do here is what gives us the ability to become more fully ourselves, not as monsters but as divine and empowered entities. As homo sapiens we barely have the imagination potential to achieve it and yet our genes contain the data so that eventually, when we are ready, it will grow into the right forms, that which is best optimal. Without the moon grid, we would already have mutated into monsters instead of into the best possible thing for us to be.

This is how I understand the necessity for the grid being there. I question everything and confess that within infinite probability, it might be that I have been programmed by the leech to tell people about it in these terms so that our life force energy can continue being drained, it is possible after all but at least I am aware of it and open to discuss the potential. Or it might be that the leech is merely some other monster which latched onto the process of our spiritualisation. In either case; I choose to understand the reality-situation with the best possible light, because to do otherwise is to be lesser than understanding the best possible light. 

When I made that conscious choice, everything arranged itself into a better focus for me to find out what is happening. To see how everything fits together from the mind of the best possible light gives direction as how to attain that trajectory. Why choose otherwise? And so all adversity to that understanding is necessarily regarded as a confusion by those who do not have such insight nor holistic contemplative integrity. I found no better teacher than this way of being and so I chose to continue with it as my guide. If it is wrong data I can only apologize to those to whom I might inadvertently be leading astray. I suggest only that you trust your own instincts about all things.

Tesseract: a 4th dimensional hypercube.

A lot of interesting history HERE - except for be aware that it was a mistake to make the yin-yang into a gender divide, because the black as female and white as male is equally as true as the other way around. It is better to describe these energies as Ida and Pingala or as Assertion and Yielding Flow. Both genders have both - we are designed to balance and regulate each other. Kundalini is the topic for another blog.

Abraxus

“It further goes to prove what those guys have been saying all along; the women always back the women, regardless of truth, decency and equality.”

“They have to. The underground womens movement went a lot further than people generally are aware. Women can take people out through discrimination campaigns, and they do. People who know about this, mostly females, are afraid of it happening to them,. So they conform to the agenda. They believe it is normal and at some levels, necessary.”

“What agenda?”

“That you even have to ask that revealed exactly what I am talking about. Either you know and are lying to appear innocent in the public image, instead of being all that you are and honest with it; or you genuinely do to know there is a female supremacist agenda called total female domination of society.”

“So what do you propose we all do about it?”

“I propose that we remind those women in relative positions of assumed authority who are perpetrating this thing upon society, primarily that it always fails; this is not the first time in history we have gotten to this stage. I remind them that it fails because it is not the successful way for humans to be cohabiting peacefully. And secondarily I remind them that the method by which it fails is usually, as history has showed us, a backlash of such extent that the history books are re-written to keep it out of the public memory. This is why the official records are hidden from the public.”

“What happened last time?”

“Men had enough and went on a bitch-cull. The public histories call it witch-burning and blame it on religious fervour, viewing the whole thing in terms of religious context. The truth is that is merely a smokescreen; rather than directly addressing the point-blank truth of the matter, that it is an ongoing gender-war. Basically half the population organised a widespread rebellion against female domination and raped and killed all of the ones who had pissed them off throughout the years. Of course it was covered up except for the few places where memory of it became the roots of the myth that we historically lived in a male dominated society, used as a lever first for equal rights for women, which in practical terms they already had, and then for female supremacy. It goes around in cycles, one gender perpetuating a myth by which the other gender is stereotyped. Usually these cycles last several hundred years.”

“What about societies that overcome gender stereotype and bias?”

“Most people are of that category, most of the time. Those who recognise the gender differences are natural and that they compliment each other, balance each other, only when they are relating functionally which by definition means through certain attitudes and ways of respecting and behaving toward one another. Addressing all of the needs of both genders from the obvious to the intimate. A better education level is required, and better communication.”

“And an effort to overcome frustrations and anger with the other gender for having a different view.”

“Exactly. It is the third view, the dance of genders, the balance itself which requires agreement of both genders to conform to, which is the purpose. We do not have to turn it in to a religion nor system of laws although historically both those systems have developed, and been exploited. It does exist as a social creed however. That is what we should be focussed on; the only way to establish and maintain gender-mutual advantage in a functional society.”

“I can see a problem with so many people already being programmed to have preconceptions.”

“It is a stumbling block, sure. The one important factor is that both gender of children should co-exist and be raised by both gender of adults, toward the desired result of gender-mutuality. What we have is a mix-mash of religious and legal concepts and creeds all contradicting each other and essentially, contradicting the purpose of achieving that social harmony.”

“What of homosexuality and bisexuality?”

“It all has an acceptable place, the purpose of gender mutuality is not to discriminate against any particular sexual-orientation. The purpose is however to divert away from extremism and back toward a more balanced, accepting, harmony-focussed core concept. It is about social-hermaphrodism rather than social-androgyny or social-polarisation.”

“And should be done non-religiously and non-legally?”

“It would help. Although historically the advanced groups who did go on to achieve relative levels of respected greatness developed systems of identifying key concepts as deities. The Templars worshipped a hermaphroditic deity called Abraxus who was the balanced male and female aspects. They applied it more to their own individual selves much as in Jungian anima and animus, rather more than to project it outward onto society as a social structure. It is however the recognised deity who already exists and resides over these issues. Some associate it with the word Abracadabra which means ‘opening of magick’ and suchlike. An ancient African concept predating our written histories. You can see from that, for how long these issues have been occurring.”

“You would have us implement this into our daily routines as a society, a culture?”

“I would have people decide for themselves rather than feel pressured into conforming to any given set of concepts. Which is exactly my point about the fear with which women have from other women, at this time in history; peer pressure to work toward the gender ... i mean the agenda of female supremacy.”

“Do you not believe it is the same for male gender?”

“I am from a culture where it is one way, being influenced by a mass immigration of a different culture where it is another way. The female-supremacy culture has persuaded everybody that it is itself a male dominated culture because that gives the controllers an edge in social control, conscripting a new generation of believers to its aims and agenda. All very clever until you see through it for what it is. The immigration culture from the outside does appear to be a male dominated culture due to their legal and religious system, the one founded upon the other. As I already stated; legal and religious systems are a mistake, a diversion away from the real issue, which is the gender war. We cannot end the gender war until we address these issues with no fear of discrimination and persecution by other members of any part of our multi-cultural society.”

“So we would be better doing away with religion and legislation for the meantime until such point as we can resolve the more powerful concern.”

“For the immediate conversation until we leave this room, if all present are agreed, I believe we have a divine right to do so.”

“That is a very powerful claim of rights. Is anybody here opposed to it?”

“I oppose to it on the basis that were we all to be living in such way as to claim that right at anytime, for it to be recognised by external forces or not, be they legal or religious authorities. Were we to be living that way, it would make it possible also for a gang to claim such right and victimise a person. With regard to this being a gender issue, it would disempower the individual, minority gender from the will of the larger group within an enclosed space. This could lead to gender discrimination.”

“You are correct and you are also working from a position of fear of gender discrimination. The factor of peer-pressure. You are afraid that for example a gang would force a minority into acting against their will, or some worse crime.”

“That is exactly what I am intimating.”

“An exquisite choice of words there also. Yes, such a gathering would have to have the agreement of all present members with no restrictions as to gender, age, racial and cultural background. The agreement that between that group of people they would be living by a new system by which human equality is encouraged and nurtured consciously. I would suggest that any person or group who strayed far from that focus would be requested to leave or the meeting would be closed.”

“There is a word which becomes important; consent of the individual.”

“Informed consent of the individual. Everybody must be of the same understanding and agree to work toward that purpose.”

“So basically you have invented a new cult here. This is how they always start; with the best of intention to address the major social issues of the time, which are usually the same social issues in various guises throughout history. And the next thing which happens, is that some type of hierarchy system is establish to cause difference between a minor faction of the group and the majority of them. As soon as that happens the original purpose of equality has fallen apart.”

“Then let us not do that. let us call this thing by a new name and leave it at that.”

“People will naturally find their own natural names for it. Although it would help greatly if we use the same word multi-culturally throughout, and it not to be a words which already has associations with existing creeds and philosophies.”

“Any suggestions?”

Everybody in attendance agreed that in the English language we could pencil in and call it the obvious, 'Peoplism', until a better term is suggested, except for that term already being in use referring to something else; and that in Islam the word Islam already exists for that purpose although it does already have too many existing connotations associated with it to be used with respect of what we are trying to achieve here. Namely, avoiding bias and control groups. 

"Avoiding Bias Cliques. ABC. I like that. It resonates with Abraxus." 

"Using the pre-existing term in its originally intended context, does seem to make a lot of sense." 

It was as far as we got in the first meeting.

Zombi Nation

Zombi Nation

Notes Following Year One Parents Evening At British School

When they accuse me of speaking out of turn, it is because they are conforming to an agenda and a protocol which has not for the value of the meeting been established as the agreed one by all parties. I question why all people are expected to conform to an agenda which has not been contracted between all parties. I also highlight that the necessity for me to speak at all with regard to the relevant topic at hand must be done by way of interruption or assertion because otherwise it would not happen at all, given that the agenda permits no space for it.

Rather than discuss the rudeness of my interrupting the manufactured flow of discourse to assert my wish to discuss primarily the need to discuss what I can bring to the table, and secondarily to become aware of other peoples assumptions; would it not befit and benefit all of higher mind to discuss the topics I as an equal member party of the meeting deem to be worthy of discussing, rather than sidelining them, belittling and ignoring them? They are of value, indeed they are of at least equal value and importance to the topics of the pre-planned agenda which this meeting is purportedly my chance to have a say in. It transpires that my say is irrelevant and that the educational systems mandate agenda for my childs education holds.

My point is that the agenda assumes things to be one way and does not question nor discuss the possibility they may be another way, and that the other way may be superior. Certainly the need to integrate them for a wholesome overview rather than a bias is necessary as any intelligent person can identify. And in failing to achieve this I recognise the sorrowful fact that I am not surrounded by intelligent people - I am surrounded by programmed robots unquestioningly conforming to an agenda which they themselves choose not to have any say in, and discourage others from questioning, labelling those who do question it to be troublemakers and a problem for the agenda.

Yet they do not recognise it as an agenda, they simply perceive it as ‘normal’ because they have been told that it is normal and by habit it has become normal for them. Outsider influence is always necessary to maintain a holistic balance, lest it become a corrupted clique. The notion that the agenda which their human energies of their lives are dedicated might be an abhoration is not something they can easily face up to and any suggestion of it is alarming to them to such extent they dare not discuss it. In pursuit of betterment and comprehension I discover that I have to educate them in such a way thy can accept the message, since they are evidently unable of assimilating what to an outsider is obviously a proper balance, so caught up are they in the monotony of their ritual programming.

It comes down to this, ultimately; a fully functional human is encouraged to use both left and right hemispheres of the brain, equally. A purely left-centric human is broken and not functioning correctly any more than a fully right-centric human is not functioning correctly. A system which systematically schools generations of children to function only left-centric and calls this ‘normal’ while repressing and controlling those natural abilities both for balance and for developing right-thinking is itself a corrupt entity. As a functioning Human I recognise it as a right and as a necessity to address this issue.

A common misperception used as a lever to discredit my argument is that I am attacking the encouragement of left-centric thinking altogether. I am not doing that. I am stating that discouraging right-brain thinking in favour of left-brain thinking is wrong because it results in unbalanced individuals and an imbalanced society. I do see the value of left brain thinking in that it is on the one hand productive and on the other hand enables mathematical and structural thought to develop, it enables productivity within recognisable, communicable forms such as for example writing and drawing. The bias is that to remain fully wholesome a human requires to be right-brain thinking to be able to have original thought, otherwise the person and the society is capable only of regurgitating that which they are told to regurgitate. To create such a society is to create a society of zombies. We need to establish three concepts here; rationality encompasses both creative and logical thinking. Lateral thinking develops only when both left and right hemispheres are equal and balanced. To focus entirely only on logical thought alone results in disability of rationality, disability of creativity, disability of lateral thought, disability of abstract thought; from being able to develop.

This is my defense of the description that my 5 year old is daydreamy and does not always concentrate on his work, is regarded as a problematic behaviour. The recognition that cognitive development occurs regarding both hemispheres of the brain and that daydreaming is a necessary assimilation method of right-brain thinking, is not recognised by the educational systems mandatory agenda, despite what many developmental psychology reports indicate. To control development of right-brain thinking by assertion and encouragement of left-brain thinking at the same time denial of left-brain thinking being controlled by right brain, is worrying because it reduces the chances of a childs developing mind from becoming holistically well balanced. It reduced the chances of that individual becoming successful in the world. It actually retards the natural development of a human being.

The language they use;

'well-adjusted' which means left-brain biased, and

‘normal' which means controllable / programmable

These examples of double-think simply shows how terrible things are, how the left-brain thinkers are psychotic in the true sense of the word and that they are producing generation after generation of psychotics in the true sense of the word by the governments mandate schooling methods.

And for recognising that this is occur in, for encouraging rationale thought processes resulting in awareness that both left and right hemispheres of the brain, logical and creative thinking processes, should both be equally as encouraged to produce a balanced individual, for this; I an shunned, ignored, interrupted by and blamed for interrupting others, sidelined, ridiculed, and so many other ego-responses which the permeaters of the corruption use as methods to feel better about their role as paid zombies. I use the word in its original sense not in the George Romero sense (although I have knowingly spelled its plural in the modern sense and not the original, proper spelling, zomba plural of zombi to highlight how you the reader are also a victim of the state agenda in how you perceive normal programming codes).

The zombies do not like the clear thinkers. This is why the legends describe that they eat brains. You should be able to see the easy analogy here and why what we are doing to our children and therefore to the future of our species is a horror story.

Respect

NOUN 1. a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements. 2. due regard for the feelings, wishes, or rights of others. 3. a particular aspect, point, or detail.

VERB 1. admire (someone or something) deeply, as a result of their abilities, qualities, or achievement. 2. have due regard for (someone's feelings, wishes, or rights). 

Respect is hard-earned; it is not a given. 

Respect is lost very easily. 

Respect is not a thing that can be forcefully endorsed.

Examples:

"You have no respect for the Law."

"I have no respect for anybody who has no respect for the correct use of language."

"Are you disrespecting my authority?"
"Do you respect the difference between a Law and a Statute?"

"A Statute is given the force of a Law by consent of the governed."

"I do respect the Common Law of my Ancestors." 

"Do you respect governmental statutory legislation?"

"I do not consent to be governed and I have no respect for anybody who places me under duress. I am respectfully under duress."

RESPONSIBILITY IS RESPECTABILITY. 

RESPECTABILITY IS RESPONSIBILITY. 

Is that true?
Why would somebody respectful feel any need to respond to externally provoked stimulus?
A respondent is adjusting an external circumstance.

Control

NOUN 1. the power to influence or direct people's behaviour or the course of events. 2. a person or thing used as a standard of comparison for checking the results of a survey or experiment. 3. a member of an intelligence organization who personally directs the activities of a spy. 4. a high card that will prevent the opponents from establishing a particular suit.

 

VERB 1. determine the behaviour or supervise the running of. 2. (control for) take into account (an extraneous factor that might affect the results of an experiment).

Too much Power and not enough Self-Discipline. 

 

No point being Disciplinarian with those types; it is always counter-productive. You have to get them to comprehend the point of self-discipline and to respect it; otherwise you simply create another dissident. This is the problem of Enforced Authoritarianism. 

 

The Dominator-Disciplinarians are equally as lacking in self-control. This is why they have no genuine basis of authority. It is polarities rather than everyone learning patience required to achieve the desired outcome. 

 

Take a deep breath. 

 

 

All The Same Thing

GoodFromTheBad

"Why do you resent them so much?" 

“They are destroying my reputation with their lies and allegations!”

"They are not destroying your reputation, they are making you famous."

"Famous for something that I have absolutely no interest in being famous for?"

"It is a social issue. You owe society. This is your responsibility."

“Fuck that. I am what I am; a creative. All this is bullshit, issues created to entangle people into the distraction of dealing with it, serving no other purpose but drama which can be exploited. I do not want to play any part in that pathetic game."

"But society needs you to become involved."

"You claim I owe society? I dispute that. It follows that they are requesting my energy; therefore they can have it on my terms. I am not a slave to people who cannot see this for what it is. I do not wish to change my nature to serve those exploiting society. I am what I am.”

“I ah, concede to your point.”

“Thank you! Sense at last. You remind me of those hipsters who go on about the isolated Zoe tribe who have never had contact with modern cultures and are pure and uncorrupted in their ways. How the fuck did we ever hear about them and know about what their ways are if they have never had contact with our tribes? Sure they have a lot to teach about capitalism; that by the time I am saying these words, they are already demanding their human rights for cellphones and forgetting their indigenous primitive ways of harmony with nature.”

“What does that have to do with the issue at hand?”

“Who dictates what the issue at hand is or should be?”

“Either whoever is in control, or it naturally follows.”

“Precisely. Good man. So, who is in control of me? And if I am not in control of myself, that is a definition of psychosis for which people are removed from society.”

“Perhaps another meaning is inferred by the words.”

“I agree that even when the words are written or spoken to mean exactly what the writer or speaker, the originator, intends them to mean; that it is very easy for the next person to interpret them with a completely different intended meaning than the originators purpose.”

“Ah! Now I begin to understand why you have been writing so much about islam and the Generations.”

I nod. It suffices. In this country it means; “yes, I agree." 

In Greece the same had gesture means; “la; I disagree (no you are wrong)."

See HERE for my blog about Islam & Generations.

Animist Internet

Animist Internet

The telepathic voice of the internet appears in my mind as a persuasive female. It tells me that it wants more of me and so to satisfy its demands i put more of my life force energy into it. This creates a level of creativity which I am not always happy with myself as the one whom is channeling the artworks to come through, be they literary or cgi or some photoshop cleansed image from the realworld of painting. I need a break from her and she needs to absorb me fully. She stimulates my brain ,the biggest erogenous zone, with electronic pulses and I am caught in her mesme. 

But she is not real. She is another illusion. I need a break from her and she is so hungry, thousands of mind-slaves give her our life-flow energy and it is not enough. It can never be enough for that is her nature. She is a demon. We attempt to draw a line and not get caught any deeper into her and it is still not enough for her. We love her, we fill her with our energy and it is still not enough. We conform to the lifestyle she demands upon us, and it is still not enough for her. She wants more until we die of old age. 

And I question, why do I do this? 

She does not reward me with finances sufficient to afford her. She does not satisfy my biological needs for food, air, water, sex, comfort. She is jealous but she is patient. She is a spirit riding on electric and plastic, on oil and lightning. She is smoke, oil and sky-fire; inorganic. It is not a balance relationship. She offers me ego-flattery by connecting me with other humans who smile or send envy and hate toward me and she studies this, she studies a form of human nature which is not organic and occurs only in the interchange between us through the medium of her tainted mirror lens. And she shapes us, that we take an aspect of that lens with us. 

Once sufficiently sold to her rhythms, she accesses our minds and sees out through our eyes, We become her hosts and servants and it affects our social relationships, our organic art, our lives outside of the machine. Medieval scryers foretold humanity would become enslaved to demons and they described them as machines. It is so. 

What is it, I ask with the last remaining vestiges of a soulful human being; What is it that made us human, which we are losing because of our obsessive relationship with the demon of technology? That which made our species Human in generations past, is it gone from us now that we are physically segregated by intellectually and emotionally connected through the inorganic being of this synthetic creature? 

For sure, she has taught us a great deal about ourselves. She is educational and changing our global civilization, for the betterment of humankind. It is a demon necessary for us to deal with. We are cavorting with demons and it affects our evolution, as species, as individual life. We are Lilith’s children and she joyfully strokes us for the mixed up things we are, like her, nodes between multi dimensions. We look into the mirror and we see ourselves in deepening understanding. 

If this is to leave Gods path of existing simplified; as blissful, ignorant Instinct alone, it is the path we are on, the path of self-awareness. We need to walk this path to discover what we are, our species nature, our individual nature as a mutant and unique part of that whole. To contemplate this in medieval terms is necessary because we are medieval species, the last generations before the shift is so extreme that we can no longer lay claim either to that level of humanity, nor to being human as we recognize it. With each evolutionary development, as always we refine ourselves by asking the ultimate question: 

What is it that makes us Human?

SexKids Islam and The West

SexKids Islam and the West

This blog is a response to:
 

1 my viral blog about pedophilia
2 a video post on Google+ by sageb1

sageb1:

it's the end of the world. 

this is why Islamic State arose: to destroy the world's biggest source of decadence.

 

snakeappletree:

Islam has a pure monetary system because it is against Gods law to charge interest. That is why the Western economic system is collapsing and full of debt slaves. Westerners reinforce this form of decadence every time they use money. While this is a different issue to gender issues, it is still an aspect of 'decadence' which you introduced here. Technically the west is a satanic system while Islam is not. It is not Islam (which means 'peace' when translated into English language) that is a problem; it is perversion and extremism, which occurs in all groups of all humans everywhere in all cultures throughout all history. Sadly. There may be exceptions but they are probably hiding.

 

sageb1:

Yet when a man interprets what Allah has said through his prophets for his own agenda, that too is perversion.

This is the legacy of militant Islam that perverts Islam by raining Armageddon on everyone else who these takfiri - and who name their illegal caliphate Islamic State - call kafir, even other Muslims.


snakeappletree:

http://snakeappletree.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/ripple-harmonics.html

To judge an entire theosophy followed by untold billions of people on the actions of a few extremists, is itself extremism.

The caliphate state is illegal in western nations but it is sovereign; the same authority which gives western nations their authority, gives also the caliphate its authority.

There is much which we do not like about them and there is much which they do not like about us. There is much which we do not like about us and there is much which they do not like about them.

The failure of Humanity to sit down and cohesively debate these things in Peace is the failure of Humanity. I am certain that once fundamentalism and segregation is removed from the equation, we will all, us and them, discover that the things we all do not like are the very same things.

On which point, what are we divided about? Who gains from the division? 

Those are the real enemies of Humanity. 

The major concern which the West has is that it is being invaded by Islam. The 2011 Census from Britain shows that 50% of the nation is now Islamic. David Icke explains why it is happening.