Quest for Authenticity

I do not have to be politically correct.

I am constantly persecuted by those who do, for being a communicator.

What is political correctness?

Political correctness is a creed. When you live by a creed, you obey its discipline.

It tells you how to behave. You are an agent of its philosophy.

Political correctness is the asserting that’s your opinion and beliefs are whatever suits the society that day. With a change of political orientation, top down from the governor, the agents of political correctness unquestioningly change their asserted opinions and believes in accordance with the new regime.

This principle, they are zombies. What they use and act on as personal beliefs are not personal believes founded from experience and thinking for yourself. Political correctness is when the governor programs the robots how to think and act. That is how insects behave in a hive.

I do not have to be politically correct because I am not an insect being; I am a human being. I be human. It is a verb. My own personal opinions and believes are built on the reality of experience through a mind which thinks for it self. I do not have to concord with the malleable, programmed, beliefs and opinions of others.

Why do people submit to political correctness?

Because they are trying to fit in and be normal. They do not wish to stand out and rock the boat. Whatever their own natural, inmate personality might otherwise be, must be repressed so that they can conform to the factory production line static model of “normality”.

George Orwell wrote a book called 1984 explaining that in a totalitarian state, the majority of people are brainwashed through many aspects of the dominator society to become politically correct in their minds; which is to say, they become zombies, unquestioningly performing activities and running subroutines indoctrinated into them by the control state.

Not only this, their brains are corrupted in such away they will defensively protect their rights to be politically correct with a superior attitude, discriminating against anything outside of it. A faculty of self-righteous left-brain extremism, which is unbalanced despite being described by the society as reasonable. Reasonable means ‘for a reason’, which is agenda. It does not mean in balance and preferable which most people assume it to because of their social conditioning.
 
I was deconditioned and trained to decondition other people. I am a human survivor. Deprogramming people of the brainwashed cult is my purpose in the human community. It is not an easy position because the zombies are programmed to take me down through whatever means necessary, usually by manipulation and lies.

What does political correctness do to the mind?

Any questioning conformity to a public image means that the individual knows they are different from the public image they are seeking to project out to the world. Immediately, there is no authenticity in their activities. [see my blog on modernism]

“She is a fake, but she does not know she is a fake!” Breakfast At Tiffany’s.

In short, political correctness is social conditioning. It exists not to help the species to adapt, thrive and survive but to enslave the species to function as an insect colony supporting the overlords.

Example. Political correctness has led to the situation where the governments media propaganda machine, the BBC [223 see blog on the skull&bones society] will no longer employ people based on their ability to do the job best, they will employ them to tick the boxes that they have fair representation of gender and skin color, because gender and skin colour are two '-ism issues' highlighted to be tackled by political correctness. If Einstein or Edison applied there, they would not be employed.

The second criteria is people willing to lie to support the state societies smokescreen, all those people wiling to conform to the paradigm of politically correctness, are willing to change their attitudes and beliefs as soon as the governor changes the goalposts. Funding goes to those categories primarily.

Increasingly a 10% minority group (official government statistics from the office of national statistics UK and equivalent USA source), the LGBT community has a loud enough voice that 'discrimination against pan-sexuality' now includes the offense of saying 'no' to those people at all. 

The same agenda of anti-racism, feminism and any other segregationist movement which specifies one group vs mainstream, where simply ‘the people’ should suffice, non-specificially. Segregation is created by controlling the context of policies regarding specified minorities. As soon as a group is specified, segregation has occurred.

As a result, everybody who wishes to work with the BBC must pretend to be bisexual and/or loudly approve of open bisexuality, whether they are or not; because within that environment, bisexuality is political correctness. Employment of agents for promotion of an agenda outweighs the necessary ability to do the job well.

Certainly there are (pc-category:bisexuals) who can do the job well. Government statistics are there are nine times more (pc-category:non-bisexual) people able to do the job at least that well.

I personally have no problems at all with people being bisexual or with bisexual people working within the media industries. That is actually my own cultural background. It is why I used this example: I know it to be true from experience.

The point being made here is; anybody working with in that environment, must pretend to be that thing in order to fit in. Immediately, the creation of a cognitive dissonance as the mainstream culture. That is the purpose of political correctness.

Cognitive dissonance is disbelief syndrome. When people are having to pretend to be a certain way to survive, which is different from how they actually, naturally are in order to survive, every individual secretly believes there is something wrong with them. Because they are different from the commonly excepted normality.

In the example above, the target arena is sexuality. The context is controlled by what ever the target arena is. All discourse occurs through that context. All conclusions are biased by that contextual process.

When an individual exists for a prolonged period or in many cases even for a very brief time, within an environment where they have to pretend to be something they’re not, that individual feels fake. That individual is encouraged to believe that feeling fake is normal and right. The individual aspires toward feeling fake before they expire towards being genuine. Any individual who aspires towards being genuine with in such a community, is alienated and prejudiced against. 

            Fake = Normal. 
            Real = Sinister.

The quest for authenticity has become recognized as a psychiatric disorder, by the people with the psychiatric disorder who intend everybody to suffer similar psychiatric disorder.

The only solution is to step out of that paradigm, and to see it for what it is. That is the purpose of this blog.

The issue is not the segregation issue, the situational issue is the issue. Why has (specified minority group agenda) even come into it?

You do not have to be politically correct either.

People with cognitive bias cannot think clearly. People with cognitive bias cannot think straight. They can obey orders provided that the instructions are within the context of the programming. They are computers. They are robots.

What is lost in political correctness is genuine people. Attempting to streamline the community so that everybody function with a better attitude towards life, the result is that everybody within that community can no longer think clearly because, their contexts have been perverted.

Your understanding of the meanings of words is not what those words mean when you read a dictionary. It is what those words mean according to the community within which you live. That is what Orwell warned us about happening.

In the lifelong search for authentic, genuine people who do not agree to compromise themselves, the only way we can get through to the zombies why we are the way we are and why it is important, is to explain it in the language they understand. They regard it to be a spiritual mission and the quest for living truthfully is regarded as religion. It conveniently becomes ‘the other’ which it is permissible to scorn because religious people are not politically correct.

The bias is that they have put everything into one box and labeled it ‘outside of pc’ instead of actively developing of the capacity to see that context process is not what is happening in the minds of the genuine people.

You do not have to be politically correct. You could get real.

PC in the community.

Political correctness is top down. As soon as misinformation enters the domain, PC people will conform to the paradigm found it on that misinformation. A lie and servants of the lie.

Adhering to political correctness gives individuals the excuse that they were not personally responsible for anything which goes wrong. Because they are not acting on their own true nature which they believe subconsciously to be a problem and a natural because it does not innately conform to the pc. It is about accountability.

“I am not accountable for my own actions because my own actions were based on what I have to do to conform to my community, not on but I would have done had I been able to do it my own way. As a result, I am innocent of the consequence of my actions.”

This philosophy is polarized against what previous generations have throughout history regarded as maturity to be responsible for one’s own actions.

The falseness of this argument was proved at the Nuremberg Trials where war criminals were held accountable for their own individual actions while ‘just following orders’.

The questioning of hierarchical authority is necessary to avoid abuses. Every step of the way. So, the hierarchy protects itself by actively discouraging that. Political correctness is to not question the authority of the higher tier. Insects know their place. As a result, hierarchy systems are rife with many forms of corruption which gets swept under the carpet. Occasionally someone higher up will you someone lower down as a scapegoat, sending a shockwave through the communities.

It is not only the media industry. It is all across the board in every state hierarchy system. It is the nature of corporate infrastructure. The hierarchy is the hive.

I am in no way encouraging anyone to be anti-social.

Wuxia Moves

 1.

"She's a fake!"

"Look more closely."

"But she doesn't realize she's a fake!" 

Two old guys from a different, more respectable, experienced and older, insightful yet repressive culture; scrutinizing Holly (Auddrey Hepburn) as 'the symbol for Modernity as Lifestyle' (1960s), in the movie Breakfast At Tiffany's 1961 American romantic comedy film directed by Blake Edwards and written by George Axelrod, based on Truman Capote's novel. 

  

And so we go into post-post-post-modernist 2018 where the intelligensia elite has to involve itself with the practicality of fakes who do not realize they are fakes. The pursuit of Truth as embodiment of Aspiration and spiritual path sets its seldom accoladed acolytes as a caste apart. Capable to see through illusion and yet surrounded by a mainstream who perpetuate illusion, the intelligensia become outcastes. 

"Zombies do not recognize that they are zombies. That's the problem." SnakeAppleTree

"They go aggressive when it is showed to them and they simply cannot and will not integrate it. There's no getting through to them. They mistake their job role within their illusion of social hierarchy, for reality - because they are cognitive dissonance mental health condition. They are technically unsane. Yet as mainstream, they re-affirm delusion as 'normality'. They persecute the non-normative, which is to persecute the truth. For scientists this is a bitch of a situation."

Experiences outside of the structural norm define the out-caste. It is here where we discover that UFO's, fayries and exotic yet real stuff, is not mythical but actual. It is here with these knowledges that we can never go back to existing within the confines of a state of restrictive intelligence and delusional decision making. Lies built upon lies create monstrous towers inevitably to fall when the fundamental wave collapses, as science tells us it will. 

2.

This is the foundation of our exploration of Wuxia. 

Wuxia (武俠, IPA: [ù.ɕjǎ]), which literally means "martial heroes", is a genre of Chinese fiction concerning the adventures of martial artists in ancient China. Although wuxia is traditionally a form of literature, its popularity has caused it to spread to diverse art forms such as Chinese opera, manhua, films, television series and video games. It forms part of popular culture in many Chinese-speaking communities around the world.

The word "wuxia" is a compound composed of the elements wu (literally "martial", "military", or "armed") and xia (literally "honourable", "chivalrous", or "hero"). A martial artist who follows the code of xia is often referred to as a xiake (literally "follower of xia") or youxia (literally "wandering xia"). In some translations, the martial artist is referred to as a "swordsman" or "swordswoman" even though he or she may not necessarily wield a sword.

The heroes in wuxia fiction typically do not serve a lord, wield military power or belong to the aristocratic class. They often originate from the lower social classes of ancient Chinese society. A code of chivalry usually requires wuxia heroes to right and redress wrongs, fight for righteousness, remove oppressors, and bring retribution for past misdeeds. Chinese xia traditions can be compared to martial codes from other cultures such as the Japanese samurai's bushido tradition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuxia

Wuxia is primarily a code of honor which instructs lifestyle. 

We have identified already that 'zombies do not recognize they are zombies and perpetuate falseness through their beliefs and thus actions'.

Contemporary Chivalry is, for the outcaste who have retained integrity and honor by standing against delusionary behavior of the zombie apocalypse mainstream horde, are by default Wuxia. Whether the individual aligns with the pursuit of waking up the zombies for the betterment of community, or avoids them, or a mix of both, is the choice of the individual. Even in Minecraft can zombies be rehabilitated. There is hope. 

Most outcaste are in some way broken by the mechanical systematic dehumanization of the state architecture. The hierarchy machine is not your friend.Recognition of this is critical to understanding why most Wuxia are kinked in some way; through constant barrage of abuse.

"When something so extreme happens to us that we cannot go back there in ordinary consciousness, but we need to go back there to heal ourselves, the pursuit of it defines us, the journey becomes expertise. This does not make us bad people."

3.

“Stories of Imagination tend to upset those without one.” Emma Lou

We are living in a fayrie-tale. True to any fayrie-tale it has darkness and beauty, lightness and mirth of the sort black witches determine kill. It's full of Love fragile from the advances of the fake and obsessively controlling world of exploitation which is the System and Society. 

She asked me my favorite movies and for the first time I thought about trends running through the first three which came to mind. This, from an overview of what the movies are about. 

"It's about music. And a good hearted thief vs society and its corruption." (on Subway)

"That ones about music too, and good hearted thieves. It explores how society accepts or not, and how hypocritical its rules are." (on Diva)

"That one's a love story about thieves and honor. Being Chinese it story-tells in an epic and beautiful way. And has great music." (on Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon)

Recognition that we are in a story. That the genre defines the dialogue. That the direction is within a context for it to flow. That the tenets of storytelling apply also to the unfolding of our lives. 

After which, justification: "I'm not a thief!" I'm not. 

Except perhaps for the dog-hearts of daughters; infinite loving, attempting always understanding as default mode to return to asap, and can become bitches when this trust is scarred, as happens to far too many. It is why the tenderness of loving is critical to positive development of relationships. 

"These are all love stories too."

I like these movies because the underdog, forced to survive repression, has to make a stand. I like the characters who make a stand against oppression. They are heroes. But there is wisdom here too, they must be the fox to outsmart superior odds. Cunning which develops from experience and insight.

Subway - 1985 French comedy drama film directed by Luc Besson and starring Isabelle Adjani and Christopher Lambert. The film is classified as part of the cinema du look movement.

Diva - 1981 French thriller film directed by Jean-Jacques Beineix, adapted from the novel Diva by Daniel Odier (under the pseudonym Delacorta).

Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon - Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (simplified Chinese: 卧虎藏龙; traditional Chinese: 臥虎藏龍) is a 2000 martial arts film. The film is a Chinese, Taiwanese, Hong Kong and American venture produced by Asian Union Film & Entertainment, China Film Co-Productions Corporation, Columbia Pictures Film Production Asia, Edko Films, Good Machine International, and Zoom Hunt Productions. Directed by Ang Lee.

Why I like these films

These films all happen to have thieves in them. I am not a thief I do not respect theft. I do value that all property is theft from community but I also value that I am looking after the tools I need to be an artist better than some disempowered twat who would break it from social frustration or spite and envy and throw it in a river.  

I did not make these movies and decide to put thieves in them. Why did the film maker make that decision? Because they are adventurous and stand against not the normality of human community but primarily about survival in a culture where outcasts exist because capitalism, not property ownership, is inequality based and by default will always create a poor underclass which once accepting the pointlessness of aspiration toward an impossible dream accepts instead degeneracy as a survival necessity. 

In short, the excitement of those who stand against the enforced rules of a society which exploits instead of providing for all. This is the second factor, that it is not the community who the thieves target but the totalitarianism of a system which has let them down. In this they are not only vindicated but become also heroes standing for the moral cause of human equality for all. 

Stealing an apple (or indeed a hole) from the barrel is less offensive than stealing a fifth of a hard earned income through taxes or the ground beneath your feet by land ownership, the many in debt as slaves to the few, and most enslaved to a corrupt system which relies on persecution and exploitation as well as the brainwashing of the masses, to self-perpetuate. Within Wuxia culture the many facets of this are explored. Such exploration is of contrasts and by example. Often, by analogy.

Such examples are not always from Chinese literature and movies thus, in Western traditions the equivalents are to be found in movies about criminals which range from the good, stylish French movies such as Subway, Diva and Nikita (1990 Luc Besson), through film noir, the ugly of gangster movies such as Untouchables (1987 Brian De Palma), to the bad of mega violence movies such as Ronin (1998 John Frankenheimer) and John Wick (2014 Chad Stahelski, David Leitch). 

All of these explore morality crisis through various situations varying from heroic revenge to simple robbery for personal gain and empirical expansion. To this we bring Lawrence of Arabia (1962 David Lean) and Zulu (1964 Cy Endfield) into the fold, and the inevitability of StarWars (1977 George Lucas) space opera dramatically inspired by wuxia precepts indeed to such extent the cliches listed as bullet point define the Wuxia genre.

The Naked Truth

The Naked Truth

I switched off because I was fed up of fighting a defensive position, against playing roles in other peoples drama, in which they needed me to be a bad guy to justify their bid for social support amongst people who did not question their motives & integrity, people who accepted their games as the reality. When someone dominates a narrative, the people worth relating with are those who question that narrative as being definitive. Today when people lie to my face because they have sided with another liar, and I can see through all this, I tell them, you are lying to me because you are a zombie. And what upsets them is not that they perceive my statement as an insult, but because they perceive it as the truth. I have ability to hold mirrors up to people face. Why would I choose to hide behind their face when I can wear my naked skull?

So I dedicated a lot of time to the contemplation of “Keeping the Peace” as justification of lies. I can not respect a liar. I barely accept those who cannot tell the difference between truth and lies and assume ‘what they have been told’ is the truth. It is a mental health dis-order called Cognitive Dissonance / Disbelief Syndrome. So many people suffer this and can end it easily by aligning themselves with Truth. The foundation of spirituality is “to see truth you have to be truth”.

Why would you respect a person who knowingly lies to you? It is abuse because it is attempt to mentally impair them, to deviate their cognitive function away from truth. They certainly do not respect you enough to create an honest world between you. Why would you knowingly create a dishonest world whenever you are in a situation to? Is it because you perceive that the liar has more power than you, so you enable and endorse that? You can depower them so easily by exposing, confronting and reprimanding them.

The conclusion I have come to in the situation above is that for those people who lie and create zombies, for personal empowerment for which we historically use the word ‘liche’ (“leech” and “leige”), or under the justification that they lie to keep the peace, both require that the person who has been lied about, the victim of the slander, one who has less influence amongst the zombie horde because they avoid and dump hate onto the target, should exist with less peace. So it is untrue that lies keep the peace. It creates stress and pins it onto the victim.

The victim has three choices. These are the three worlds within the victims power to manifest.

One: (inaction) accept the situation and let them think whatever they want, because they are zombies they are incapable of clarity of thought anyway. This is to endorse the slander and be a party to it.  Remain identified as “victim”.

Two: (action) protest and attempt to win zombies over to the truth by telling the other side of the story which they have never asked to hear because they are zombies. Discredit the liars. Refute being ‘victim’ yet perpetuate war instead of bringing peace. Justified by; truth and understanding within a community which has been perverted by lies.

Three: (ascension) rise above the whole situation, detach, and know that aligning with truth means to rise above the dirt in which the zombies wallow, to attain a spiritual purity which liches cannot even see. Let them rot in their own deceptions and illusions.

In terms of transactional analysis it look like this:

adult - adult = truth - truth
parent - child = liar - zombie
child - child = zombie - zombie

“Grown-ups can handle the truth” and the famous retort: “Why do you lie to your children?” (Your duty is to support them to survive in adult life.)

“All this will be for nothing. We will have been for nothing. Defined by their histories, distorted to fit into their narrative. Until all that is left of us are the monsters in the stories they tell their children.” Captain Flint, Black Sails

Cick HERE for Universal Truth

Zombi Nation

Zombi Nation

Notes Following Year One Parents Evening At British School

When they accuse me of speaking out of turn, it is because they are conforming to an agenda and a protocol which has not for the value of the meeting been established as the agreed one by all parties. I question why all people are expected to conform to an agenda which has not been contracted between all parties. I also highlight that the necessity for me to speak at all with regard to the relevant topic at hand must be done by way of interruption or assertion because otherwise it would not happen at all, given that the agenda permits no space for it.

Rather than discuss the rudeness of my interrupting the manufactured flow of discourse to assert my wish to discuss primarily the need to discuss what I can bring to the table, and secondarily to become aware of other peoples assumptions; would it not befit and benefit all of higher mind to discuss the topics I as an equal member party of the meeting deem to be worthy of discussing, rather than sidelining them, belittling and ignoring them? They are of value, indeed they are of at least equal value and importance to the topics of the pre-planned agenda which this meeting is purportedly my chance to have a say in. It transpires that my say is irrelevant and that the educational systems mandate agenda for my childs education holds.

My point is that the agenda assumes things to be one way and does not question nor discuss the possibility they may be another way, and that the other way may be superior. Certainly the need to integrate them for a wholesome overview rather than a bias is necessary as any intelligent person can identify. And in failing to achieve this I recognise the sorrowful fact that I am not surrounded by intelligent people - I am surrounded by programmed robots unquestioningly conforming to an agenda which they themselves choose not to have any say in, and discourage others from questioning, labelling those who do question it to be troublemakers and a problem for the agenda.

Yet they do not recognise it as an agenda, they simply perceive it as ‘normal’ because they have been told that it is normal and by habit it has become normal for them. Outsider influence is always necessary to maintain a holistic balance, lest it become a corrupted clique. The notion that the agenda which their human energies of their lives are dedicated might be an abhoration is not something they can easily face up to and any suggestion of it is alarming to them to such extent they dare not discuss it. In pursuit of betterment and comprehension I discover that I have to educate them in such a way thy can accept the message, since they are evidently unable of assimilating what to an outsider is obviously a proper balance, so caught up are they in the monotony of their ritual programming.

It comes down to this, ultimately; a fully functional human is encouraged to use both left and right hemispheres of the brain, equally. A purely left-centric human is broken and not functioning correctly any more than a fully right-centric human is not functioning correctly. A system which systematically schools generations of children to function only left-centric and calls this ‘normal’ while repressing and controlling those natural abilities both for balance and for developing right-thinking is itself a corrupt entity. As a functioning Human I recognise it as a right and as a necessity to address this issue.

A common misperception used as a lever to discredit my argument is that I am attacking the encouragement of left-centric thinking altogether. I am not doing that. I am stating that discouraging right-brain thinking in favour of left-brain thinking is wrong because it results in unbalanced individuals and an imbalanced society. I do see the value of left brain thinking in that it is on the one hand productive and on the other hand enables mathematical and structural thought to develop, it enables productivity within recognisable, communicable forms such as for example writing and drawing. The bias is that to remain fully wholesome a human requires to be right-brain thinking to be able to have original thought, otherwise the person and the society is capable only of regurgitating that which they are told to regurgitate. To create such a society is to create a society of zombies. We need to establish three concepts here; rationality encompasses both creative and logical thinking. Lateral thinking develops only when both left and right hemispheres are equal and balanced. To focus entirely only on logical thought alone results in disability of rationality, disability of creativity, disability of lateral thought, disability of abstract thought; from being able to develop.

This is my defense of the description that my 5 year old is daydreamy and does not always concentrate on his work, is regarded as a problematic behaviour. The recognition that cognitive development occurs regarding both hemispheres of the brain and that daydreaming is a necessary assimilation method of right-brain thinking, is not recognised by the educational systems mandatory agenda, despite what many developmental psychology reports indicate. To control development of right-brain thinking by assertion and encouragement of left-brain thinking at the same time denial of left-brain thinking being controlled by right brain, is worrying because it reduces the chances of a childs developing mind from becoming holistically well balanced. It reduced the chances of that individual becoming successful in the world. It actually retards the natural development of a human being.

The language they use;

'well-adjusted' which means left-brain biased, and

‘normal' which means controllable / programmable

These examples of double-think simply shows how terrible things are, how the left-brain thinkers are psychotic in the true sense of the word and that they are producing generation after generation of psychotics in the true sense of the word by the governments mandate schooling methods.

And for recognising that this is occur in, for encouraging rationale thought processes resulting in awareness that both left and right hemispheres of the brain, logical and creative thinking processes, should both be equally as encouraged to produce a balanced individual, for this; I an shunned, ignored, interrupted by and blamed for interrupting others, sidelined, ridiculed, and so many other ego-responses which the permeaters of the corruption use as methods to feel better about their role as paid zombies. I use the word in its original sense not in the George Romero sense (although I have knowingly spelled its plural in the modern sense and not the original, proper spelling, zomba plural of zombi to highlight how you the reader are also a victim of the state agenda in how you perceive normal programming codes).

The zombies do not like the clear thinkers. This is why the legends describe that they eat brains. You should be able to see the easy analogy here and why what we are doing to our children and therefore to the future of our species is a horror story.

An Hidden Discourse

An Hidden Discourse is the preferred title to;
Layers Of Meaning; Outside The Box; Go Go Gobbledigook; ReAssociative DisOrder; Cognitive Spanners, Bad Nut Jobs; They Target Our Children; Radio Mass Psychosis  and of similar ilk;

it abbreviating to AHD which itself alternatively means Attention (Deficit) Hyperactivity Disorder, a common diagnosis for kids (although it affects adults too) who are not given enough very early formative Positive Parenting and also for kids who are allergic to mercury based vaccinations. 

Behavioural psychologists recognise symptoms to involve unruly behaviour and non-responsive to adult stimulation, an impossibility for parental figures to control kids who do not relate to them. While regarded as usual in teenagers, an extreme form of this behaviour in younger children is alarming as is the increasing numbers, as is a distinct lack of specialist facilities and training. In the town where I live, one single mother very recently told me that the Social Services have advised her that if she voluntarily signs her ADHD child over to a foster parent, he will get every type of help he needs funded by the state, but if she does not then there is nothing they will do about it. 

Beware the Gobblers!

Fostering is a Growth Industry  in UK even during this time of controlled economic depression (a tv news bulletin today 25.1.2013 used the phrase 'a 'triple-dip' economic decline'), largely due to Forced Adoption Policy of a highly suspect QUANGO Anthony Douglas CBE BOTH the "Chief Executive  of CAFCASS (Children And Family Court Advisory Social Services) AND Chair of the British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF)."

Interestingly in a nameless and remote African village where detailed school records were kept, it was discovered that of three categories of children; 1 school-attendant, attentive, high-grade students, and 2 middle-mixed students, and 3 school-refuser problem-children; that when a plague swept through the region, the only survivors at all were those of the school-refuser problem child category; because they had not been indoctrinated into civilised behaviour and knew instinctively how to fend for themselves in the wild; because 'they had no concept of the normal social rules'.

Sometime during the past decade I spoke with a friend whose ASBO badge of honour accessed her a free pass funded by the State during which her rebellious teenage nature was re-directed to a rather more socially constructive and exciting activity of working in a radio station established by social workers and police in the UK South Wales town of Pontypool, a facility where reprobates and deviants were given another chance at conformity and an incentive toward social awareness by playing their favourite songs (at the time this was blatantly the Goldie Looking Chain whose lyrics about dope smoking unifying the South Wales gangs into a community known locally as the Massive actually had the desired effect) and doing interviews about how the youth of today feel about life, what they do with their time here on the planet, etc. It was all going very well indeed until un-named reprobates stole the radio station equipment and sold it on the underground to raise money for their dope smoking. Another genius incentive by The System.

The potential, alternate titles for this blog were developed from contemplation of my interests and themes throughout these blogs, following from watching the classic cult movie PONTYPOOL by Tony Burgess, the first to be filmed in a trilogy based on his 1998 novel Pontypool Changes Everything. 

Sometime during the naughty noughties of the 21st century, a government department allocated me a regular slot in a music studio called 24/7 in Pontypool, a few A-roads deeper into the legendary SW Valleys than my Zooport city conapt.

In 1999 I had read Anthony Burgess literary classic 1962 novel A Clockwork Orange, which deals with language, literature, classical music, street gangs, degeneration of society and mockery of morality and order, ultraviolence and Mind Control. A Clockwork Orange is a novel within a novel, something akin to Philip K Dicks (also 1962) The Man In The High Castle. 

One thing I appreciated about ACO is that it is written entirely in a streetspeak which initially confuses the reader for several pages until, immersed into its world through an educational narrative, the language gradually becomes comprehensive; until by the end of the book the reader is fluent in [it].

"Nadsat is a vibrant, spontaneous mix of derived Russian, modified Slavic words, Cockney rhyming slang and hybrid words of Burgess’ own creation." chumble

Comparison between the readers shift of consciousness and the main protagonists eventual re-education as he is indoctrinated by state mind control technologies (reminiscent of the 1985 Terry Gilliam movie Brazil) is a direct contrast. This is also evident in the 1971 Stanley Kubric movie adaptation of the same title.

The writer of Pontypool Changes Everything (novel) and Pontypool (Movie Trilogy scripts)  took his pen name Tony Burgess from Anthony Burgess (A Clockwork Orange). This speaks volumes for the literary pun's involved not only in the story itself as scripted, but the general surrounding themeology necessarily involved in such an examination of "understanding" the 'originally intended meaning' of a phrase, word or concept. Although the movie does not immediately go into it, we are dealing here with abstract memes and auto-suggestive programming. 

Pontypool (movie) deals with some serious issues, which regular readers of my blog will recognise to be amongst my fields of interest. Its opening speech made by the radio star Grant Mazzy...

  "Mrs French’s cat is missing. The signs are posted all over town. Have you seen Honey? Well, we have all seen the posters, but nobody has seen Honey the cat. Nobody, until last Thursday morning, when Miss Coulettepiscine swerved her car to miss Honey the cat when she drove across a bridge. Well this bridge, now slightly damaged, is a bit of a local treasure and even has its own fancy name; Pont du Flaque.

Now, Collette, that sounds like Coullotte, that’s Panty in French. And Cousine means Pool, Panty Pool. Flaque also means Pool in French so, Collette Piscine, in French Panty Pool drives over the Pont du Flaque, the Pontypool if you will, to avoid hitting Mrs French’s cat that’s been missing in Pontypool. Pont du pool. Pontypool. Pantypool. Pont du Flaque. What does it mean?

Well Norman Maylor, he had an interesting theory that he used to explain the strange coincidences in the aftermath of the JFK assassination. In the wake of huge events, after them and before them, physical details they spasm for a moment, they sort of unlock and when they come back into focus, they suddenly coincide in a weird way. Street names and birth dates and middle names, all kind of superfluous things appear related to each other, it’s a ripple effect. So, what does it mean? Well, it means something’s going to happen, something big.

But then, something’s always about to happen.” " Grant Mazzy


...outlines that something special is happening here, that our routine and humble zombi-like trance state of perception is about to be shaken into a looser, more random method of associating, than we are habitually used to; that this shake-up will resolve itself into a different mental process, a different way of thinking, acting, behaving; that we will effectively become different people after the event, members of a society that has moved on from its current stagnation. Symbolic of this is our approach to language, not simply through the words we use but by the underlaying structure of the grammar connecting these concepts, the synaptic trains connecting nodes in our brains.

The introduction speech of Pontypool uses the same method seen in the intro to the 1999 family movie Magnolia by Paul Thomas Anderson, which also explores the same topic of apparently random, unrelated events coincidentally conforming to some type of inexplicable syncronicity that most definitely connects them, with several storylines and components of those storylines following the same pattern interpreted from several distinctly different angles, yet expressed by the same symbols to describe the intricacies resonating throughout several layers of meaning.



(Pause for breath)



This movie was released in Canada in 2008; predating the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting on 14.12.2012 in which 20 children and 6 adults were killed; an incident that followed from the Batman Shooter and apparent Remote Mind Control Victim Jamie Holmes, son of an American government agency whistleblower. Both incidents at a time during which the Obama office of the America Corporation are attempting to gain popular opinion regarding criminalizing guns so they can hasten in a Gun Control Nullification Bill, despite the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights empowering the People to legally bare arms and form militia to remove any rogue government, such as one that is attempting to undermine citizens Rights, much less attack its own people, or any people for that matter.

As passed by the Congress in 1791:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It is an interesting situation. I was recently asked my own opinion on gun laws and so I quote; "guns do not kill people; people kill people" and that despite my living in a nation where I can get a gun more easily than I can get a gun license, which I can also do easily; I choose not to own a gun nor hang out with those who do, for whatever their purpose.

In Holland where guns are available and licensed, and so too is cannabis available and licensed for recreational and medical use; in the past decade there has been an increased social awareness and collective effort toward looking out for each other rather than creating fear or attacking one another; this has purportedly been repeatedly reported by all levels of society, who universally claim the effect of cannabis 'toward a fear free society' to be responsible for increased peacefulness in the community; the nation is closing its prisons because there are decreasing number of criminals and increasing number of empty prisons.

In the 2002 Michael Moore documentary film Bowling For Columbine, named after that two guys went bowling prior to shooting up a school, the film maker goes into a Canadian bank that were giving away free guns to anyone who opened a bank account with them; he asks the bank clerk as he is given his free gun "what is to stop me from using this to rob you?" 

The clerk says nothing... 

Hope Sandoval of Mazzy Star