The Divide

The Divide

She gets it off her chest.
She bitches about him to all her friends and asks their advice.

He’s not in a relationship with her.
He’s in a relationship with a hive system.
The public terminology describes it as her support network.

The practicality, once we strip it of biased meanings to describe the situation within context of agenda based paradigms, is;
She’s striving to balance between opinions of those who affect her.
He’s having to adapt to all that.

The whoever’s of her community and their issues, objectives, attitudes, agenda’s, beliefs and prejudice, has become a system of leverage affecting both him and the entity of their private relationship, something personal between them as a couple which should exclude everyone else. His argument is that it is not a private relationship, if she’s in tangled with a lot of other people who are affecting it.

He would prefer that if she has any problems, she faced him directly about them so they can work through it together. This should not involve other people who will only distract them from personal intuition necessary to find sustainable harmony.

What she is doing by talking with people who don’t know him, about it, is creating a situation where he does not even know there is a problem, but their relationship is being affected by her attitude changing to conform to however her friends are telling her to behave.

He sees only that other people, outsiders, are playing games, controlling the harmony he is trying to build and which they should both be trying to build together, to the exclusion of external forces. Their energy is dissipating outward to serve a multitude instead of being retained and empowered for them both to thrive. It dooms the relationship which requires sufficient energy to be sustainable.

Thus, he has no authority within their relationship although strangers do.
Its stability is destabilized. Through no fault of his own. So he reconciles; she is unstable.

Her friends will collectively protect themselves by saying he is the element which has destabilized her. She has to weigh between her community and support network, versus her relationship. He does not identify this as monogamy because she is playing and being played by multiple games which he has become entangled because of her.

Society purposefuly-mistakenly regards his opinion about this as “his being dominating and controlling in the relationship.” The label causes her anxiety and she retreats from him, from the relationship, because it is a tag used by the social agenda of causing division and fear instead of healing and harmony. It creates targets for discrimination out of people who are supportive of their relationship partner.

We live in a community where it is more acceptable to sacrifice the relationship than it is to sacrifice the so-called support network, even when it can be identified that they are not being supportive but are playing control games; which is an abuse, from which he is trying to protect her from in society. Society protects its rights to play such control games under the guise of describing it as being supportive.

Most of this is understated to such extent people cannot recognise it as the underlaying dynamic of relationship break-ups. Where he is able to highlight that these are the dynamics and the leverage in play, he is accused of being a complete bastard by everybody who, are intentionally or not (manipulator or zombie), exploiting those levers. They are shaken up by it so they defend themselves and point out that he is now destabilizing their network.

Although not his primary intention, he is by consequence destabilizing it because it is a network built on the accepting of an inhumane condition which he does not accept to be righteous behaviour. Such condition is subversive and covert but no less frightening or abusive than are overt prejudices of racism, sexism, etc. To be party to abusive systems is to be a party to an abuse network. Many people do not recognize this to be a wrong, the same way nobody questioned slavery when it was deemed ‘normal’.

Her support network will protect her from the abusive man by discouraging her from having anything more to do with him. The man is now widely known as being abusive and destabilizing of people, which is the exact opposite of everything he has set out to do, how he has acted and what he believes in.

The above scenario outlines normal life for most men in our communities.

The period during which the couple get together and officially separate, is generally termed ‘the relationship’. These incidents are the tests and trials which relationships go through. “Us against the World” / “Society is not your friend.”

The safe-space between couples only exists when both partners are actively protecting it from and against other people’s opinions and interference. Women who behave that way (as described above), are known amongst men who have experienced this dynamic as being users; are identified as being both abused and abusers.

The so-called friendship network usually do not actually know the guy in question. Some of them may have met him on one on several occasions. Their opinion is prejudiced by the position she puts herself in, of being on one hand uncertain and on the other, attempting to be the compromise between everybody else around her. She positions herself in the centre of her universe, for maximum leverage and attention gain.

This is in contrast with putting an intimate relationship in the centre of a universe, as both partners must do for that relationship to survive. Relationships are about working together, or they are about exploitation. This is true of couples and this is true of social networks, communities.

The most disposable factor here is the penis which she puts into the centre of her root chakra, into her body, and it’s associated electromagnetic system for which we are designed to couple-up and combine; for personal balance and for spiritual evolution.

Feminism encourages women that “strong women” are those who can survive independently of intimate relationships with males. Our biologies are designed such we need that. Humanism is about seeing beyond segregational agenda’s, achieving personal empowerment through natural union. Strong People are those who tell their fake friends to fuck off for splitting up their supportive relationships.

“I have accepted this person as the other part of me, my balance, and it works and it makes us both stronger.” 

Divided, we become embroiled in and exploited by covert energy exploitation games. ‘Abuse disguised as support’ relies on brainwashing people into believing natural balance is abuse, into believing that dedicating energy to achieving natural balance is being weak.

You can not harmonise as an equal with someone who seeks only to exploit you and make you feel lucky for it; you can only serve them and their exploitation agendas. Often, people do not know they are agents of those agendas because they conform to political correctness instead of to reality. Do not serve people who seek only to exploit you.

"A very common aspect of psychological abuse and manipulation is for the abuser to claim that the victim is being abusive towards them ... the abusers “victim complex” and “gaslighting” ..." Nicholas Clare

 

Quest for Authenticity

I do not have to be politically correct.

I am constantly persecuted by those who do, for being a communicator.

What is political correctness?

Political correctness is a creed. When you live by a creed, you obey its discipline.

It tells you how to behave. You are an agent of its philosophy.

Political correctness is the asserting that’s your opinion and beliefs are whatever suits the society that day. With a change of political orientation, top down from the governor, the agents of political correctness unquestioningly change their asserted opinions and believes in accordance with the new regime.

This principle, they are zombies. What they use and act on as personal beliefs are not personal believes founded from experience and thinking for yourself. Political correctness is when the governor programs the robots how to think and act. That is how insects behave in a hive.

I do not have to be politically correct because I am not an insect being; I am a human being. I be human. It is a verb. My own personal opinions and believes are built on the reality of experience through a mind which thinks for it self. I do not have to concord with the malleable, programmed, beliefs and opinions of others.

Why do people submit to political correctness?

Because they are trying to fit in and be normal. They do not wish to stand out and rock the boat. Whatever their own natural, inmate personality might otherwise be, must be repressed so that they can conform to the factory production line static model of “normality”.

George Orwell wrote a book called 1984 explaining that in a totalitarian state, the majority of people are brainwashed through many aspects of the dominator society to become politically correct in their minds; which is to say, they become zombies, unquestioningly performing activities and running subroutines indoctrinated into them by the control state.

Not only this, their brains are corrupted in such away they will defensively protect their rights to be politically correct with a superior attitude, discriminating against anything outside of it. A faculty of self-righteous left-brain extremism, which is unbalanced despite being described by the society as reasonable. Reasonable means ‘for a reason’, which is agenda. It does not mean in balance and preferable which most people assume it to because of their social conditioning.
 
I was deconditioned and trained to decondition other people. I am a human survivor. Deprogramming people of the brainwashed cult is my purpose in the human community. It is not an easy position because the zombies are programmed to take me down through whatever means necessary, usually by manipulation and lies.

What does political correctness do to the mind?

Any questioning conformity to a public image means that the individual knows they are different from the public image they are seeking to project out to the world. Immediately, there is no authenticity in their activities. [see my blog on modernism]

“She is a fake, but she does not know she is a fake!” Breakfast At Tiffany’s.

In short, political correctness is social conditioning. It exists not to help the species to adapt, thrive and survive but to enslave the species to function as an insect colony supporting the overlords.

Example. Political correctness has led to the situation where the governments media propaganda machine, the BBC [223 see blog on the skull&bones society] will no longer employ people based on their ability to do the job best, they will employ them to tick the boxes that they have fair representation of gender and skin color, because gender and skin colour are two '-ism issues' highlighted to be tackled by political correctness. If Einstein or Edison applied there, they would not be employed.

The second criteria is people willing to lie to support the state societies smokescreen, all those people wiling to conform to the paradigm of politically correctness, are willing to change their attitudes and beliefs as soon as the governor changes the goalposts. Funding goes to those categories primarily.

Increasingly a 10% minority group (official government statistics from the office of national statistics UK and equivalent USA source), the LGBT community has a loud enough voice that 'discrimination against pan-sexuality' now includes the offense of saying 'no' to those people at all. 

The same agenda of anti-racism, feminism and any other segregationist movement which specifies one group vs mainstream, where simply ‘the people’ should suffice, non-specificially. Segregation is created by controlling the context of policies regarding specified minorities. As soon as a group is specified, segregation has occurred.

As a result, everybody who wishes to work with the BBC must pretend to be bisexual and/or loudly approve of open bisexuality, whether they are or not; because within that environment, bisexuality is political correctness. Employment of agents for promotion of an agenda outweighs the necessary ability to do the job well.

Certainly there are (pc-category:bisexuals) who can do the job well. Government statistics are there are nine times more (pc-category:non-bisexual) people able to do the job at least that well.

I personally have no problems at all with people being bisexual or with bisexual people working within the media industries. That is actually my own cultural background. It is why I used this example: I know it to be true from experience.

The point being made here is; anybody working with in that environment, must pretend to be that thing in order to fit in. Immediately, the creation of a cognitive dissonance as the mainstream culture. That is the purpose of political correctness.

Cognitive dissonance is disbelief syndrome. When people are having to pretend to be a certain way to survive, which is different from how they actually, naturally are in order to survive, every individual secretly believes there is something wrong with them. Because they are different from the commonly excepted normality.

In the example above, the target arena is sexuality. The context is controlled by what ever the target arena is. All discourse occurs through that context. All conclusions are biased by that contextual process.

When an individual exists for a prolonged period or in many cases even for a very brief time, within an environment where they have to pretend to be something they’re not, that individual feels fake. That individual is encouraged to believe that feeling fake is normal and right. The individual aspires toward feeling fake before they expire towards being genuine. Any individual who aspires towards being genuine with in such a community, is alienated and prejudiced against. 

            Fake = Normal. 
            Real = Sinister.

The quest for authenticity has become recognized as a psychiatric disorder, by the people with the psychiatric disorder who intend everybody to suffer similar psychiatric disorder.

The only solution is to step out of that paradigm, and to see it for what it is. That is the purpose of this blog.

The issue is not the segregation issue, the situational issue is the issue. Why has (specified minority group agenda) even come into it?

You do not have to be politically correct either.

People with cognitive bias cannot think clearly. People with cognitive bias cannot think straight. They can obey orders provided that the instructions are within the context of the programming. They are computers. They are robots.

What is lost in political correctness is genuine people. Attempting to streamline the community so that everybody function with a better attitude towards life, the result is that everybody within that community can no longer think clearly because, their contexts have been perverted.

Your understanding of the meanings of words is not what those words mean when you read a dictionary. It is what those words mean according to the community within which you live. That is what Orwell warned us about happening.

In the lifelong search for authentic, genuine people who do not agree to compromise themselves, the only way we can get through to the zombies why we are the way we are and why it is important, is to explain it in the language they understand. They regard it to be a spiritual mission and the quest for living truthfully is regarded as religion. It conveniently becomes ‘the other’ which it is permissible to scorn because religious people are not politically correct.

The bias is that they have put everything into one box and labeled it ‘outside of pc’ instead of actively developing of the capacity to see that context process is not what is happening in the minds of the genuine people.

You do not have to be politically correct. You could get real.

PC in the community.

Political correctness is top down. As soon as misinformation enters the domain, PC people will conform to the paradigm found it on that misinformation. A lie and servants of the lie.

Adhering to political correctness gives individuals the excuse that they were not personally responsible for anything which goes wrong. Because they are not acting on their own true nature which they believe subconsciously to be a problem and a natural because it does not innately conform to the pc. It is about accountability.

“I am not accountable for my own actions because my own actions were based on what I have to do to conform to my community, not on but I would have done had I been able to do it my own way. As a result, I am innocent of the consequence of my actions.”

This philosophy is polarized against what previous generations have throughout history regarded as maturity to be responsible for one’s own actions.

The falseness of this argument was proved at the Nuremberg Trials where war criminals were held accountable for their own individual actions while ‘just following orders’.

The questioning of hierarchical authority is necessary to avoid abuses. Every step of the way. So, the hierarchy protects itself by actively discouraging that. Political correctness is to not question the authority of the higher tier. Insects know their place. As a result, hierarchy systems are rife with many forms of corruption which gets swept under the carpet. Occasionally someone higher up will you someone lower down as a scapegoat, sending a shockwave through the communities.

It is not only the media industry. It is all across the board in every state hierarchy system. It is the nature of corporate infrastructure. The hierarchy is the hive.

I am in no way encouraging anyone to be anti-social.

Voice to Skull Microwave Technology Patent

http://rense.com/general37/skull.htm Patent For Microwave Voice-To-Skull Technology 5-9-3 Patent For Microwave Voice-To-Skull Technology &d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='4877027'.WKU.&OS =PN/4877027&RS=PN/4877027> United States Patent 4,877,027 Brunkan October 31, 1989 Hearing System Abstract Sound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform. The waveform consists of frequency modulated bursts. Each burst is made up of ten to twenty uniformly spaced pulses grouped tightly together. The burst width is between 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds. The pulse width is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. The bursts are frequency modulated by the audio input to create the sensation of hearing in the person whose head is irradiated. Inventors: Brunkan; Wayne B. (P.O. Box 2411, Goleta, CA 93118) Appl. No.: 202679 Filed: June 6, 1988 Current U.S. Class: 607/56 Intern'l Class: A61N 005/00 Field of Search: 128/420.5,804,419 R,421,422,746 381/68 References Cited 1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=CR89&Query=ref/4,877,027> [Referenced By] U.S. Patent Documents 1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query= PN%2F3629521>3629521 Dec., 1971 Puharich et al. 128/402. Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF &p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes& Query=PN%2F3766331>3766331 Oct., 1973 Zink 128/420. Other References Cain et al, "Mammalian Auditory Responses . . . ", IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, pp. 288-293, 1978. Frey et al, "Human Perception . . . Energy" Science, 181,356-358, 1973. Jaski, "Radio Waves & Life", Radio-Electronics, pp. 45-45, Sep. 1960. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, Lin, 1978, pp. 176-177. Primary Examiner: Cohen; Lee S. Attorney, Agent or Firm: Brelsford; Harry W. Claims I claim: 1. Apparatus for creating human hearing comprising: (a) an audio source for creating electrical audio waves having positive peaks; (b) a frequency modulator generator connected to the audio source to create frequency modulated bursts; (c) a source of constant voltage to create a voltage standard that is in the range of 25% to 85% of the peak voltage of the audio waves; (d) a comparator connected to the voltage source and the audio source to compare the instantaneous voltage of the waves from the audio source with the voltage standard; (e) a connection of the comparator to the frequency modulator generator to activate the frequency modulator generator when the instantaneous voltage of the audio wave exceeds the standard voltage; (f) a microwave generator creating microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz and connected to the frequency modulator generator, generating microwaves only when pulsed by the frequency modulator generator; and (g) an antenna connected to the microwave generator to radiate the head of a human being to produce the sounds of the audio source. 2. Apparatus as set forth in claim 1 wherein the frequency generating range of the frequency modulator generator is 1 Khz to 100 KHz for bursts and 100 KHz to 20 MHZ for pulses within a burst. 3. Apparatus as set forth in claim 1 wherein the frequency generating range of the frequency modulator generator is one Khz to 100 KHz for bursts and 100 KHz to 20 MHZ for pulses within a burst and the duration of each pulse of the frequency modulator generator is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. 4. Apparatus as set forth in claim 1 wherein the voltage standard is approximately 50% of the peak of the audio waves. 5. Apparatus as set forth in claim 1 wherein the antenna is of the type that projects the microwaves in space to the head of a person. 6. Apparatus for creating human hearing comprising: (a) an oscillator creating an electromagnetic carrier wave at a selected frequency in the range of 100 Mhz to 10,000 Mhz; (b) a pulse generator connected to said oscillator to pulse the carrier with pulses having a width in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond with a minimum spacing between pulses of about 25 nanoseconds; (c) a frequency modulator connected to the pulse generator; (d) an audio signal generator connected to the modulator which modulates the pulses in accordance with the audio signal; and (e) a transmitting antenna connected to the oscillator to transmit the carrier wave as thus modified to project the electromagnetic energy through space to the head of a person. 7. Apparatus as set forth in claim 6 wherein the modulator is a frequency modulator to vary the density of bursts within an audio envelope as a function of the audio amplitude. 8. The method of irradiating a person's head to produce sound in the head of the person comprising (a) irridiating the head of a person with microwaves in the range of 100 Mhz to 10,000 Mhz; (b) pulsing said microwaves with pulses in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond; and (c) frequency modulating groups of pulses called bursts by audio waves wherein the modulation extends from 1 Khz to 100 Khz. Description This invention relates to a hearing system for human beings in which high frequency electromagnetic energy is projected through the air to the head of a human being and the electromagnetic energy is modulated to create signals that can be discerned by the human being regardless of the hearing ability of the person. THE PRIOR ART Various types of apparatus and modes of application have been proposed and tried to inject intelligible sounds into the heads of human beings. Some of these have been devised to simulate speech and other sounds in deaf persons and other systems have been used to inject intelligible signals in persons of good hearing, but bypassing the normal human hearing organs. U.S. Pat. No. 3,629,521 issued Dec. 21, 1971 describes the use of a pair of electrodes applied to a person's head to inject speech into the head of a deaf person. An oscillator creates a carrier in the range of 18 to 36 KHz that is amplitude modulated by a microphone. Science magazine volume 181, page 356 describes a hearing system utilizing a radio frequency carrier of 1.245 GHz delivered through the air by means of a waveguide and horn antenna. The carrier was pulsed at the rate of 50 pulses per second. The human test subject reported a buzzing sound and the intensity varied with the peak power. Similar methods of creating "clicks" inside the human head are reported in I.E.E.E. Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, volume BME 25, No. 3, May 1978. The transmission of intelligible speech by audio modulated Microwave is described in the book Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications by James C. Lin 1978 publisher Charles C. Thomas. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION I have discovered that a pulsed signal on a radio frequency carrier of about 1,000 megahertz (1000 MHz) is effective in creating intelligible signals inside the head of a person if this electromagnetic (EM) energy is projected through the air to the head of the person. Intelligible signals are applied to the carrier by microphone or other audio source and I cause the bursts to be frequency modulated. The bursts are composed of a group of pulses. The pulses are carefully selected for peak strength and pulse width. Various objects, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent in the specification and claims. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the drawings forming an integral part of this specification: FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the system of the invention. FIG. 2 is a diagram of an audio wave which is the input to be perceived by the recipient. FIG. 3 is a diagram on the same time coordinate as FIG. 2 showing bursts that are frequency modulated by the wave form of FIG. 2. FIG. 4 shows, on an enlarged time coordinate, that each vertical line depicted in FIG. 3 is a burst of pulses. (A burst is a group of pulses). FIG. 5 shows, on a further enlarged time coordinate, a single continues pulse, Depicted as a vertical line in FIG. 4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Inasmuch as microwaves can damage human tissue, any projected energy must be carefully regulated to stay within safe limits. The guideline for 1,000 MHz, set by the American Standards Institute, is 3.3 mw/cm2 (3.3 milliwatts per square centimeter). The apparatus described herein must be regulated to stay within this upper limit. Referring to FIG. 1 a microphone 10 or other generator of audio frequencies, delivers its output by wire 11 to an FM capable pulse generator 12 and by branch wire 13 to a comparator 14. The comparator 14 also receives a signal from a voltage standard 16. When the peak voltage of the audio generator 10 falls below the standard 16 the comparator delivers a signal by wire 17 to the FM capable pulse generator 12 to shut down the pulse generator 12. This avoids spurious signals being generated. The output of the FM pulse generator 12 is delivered by wire 18 to a microwave generator 19 which delivers its output to the head of a human being 23. In this fashion the person 23 is radiated with microwaves that are in short bursts. The microwave generator 19 operates at a steady frequency presently preferred at 1,000 megahertz (1,000 million). I presently prefer to pulse the microwave energy at pulse widths of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. For any one setting of the FM capable generator 12, this width is fixed. The pulses are arranged in bursts. The timing between bursts is controlled by the height of the audio envelope above the voltage standard line. In addition the bursts are spaced from one another at a non-uniform rate of 1 to 100 KHz. This non-uniform spacing of bursts is created in the FM capable generator 12. Referring to FIG. 2 there is illustrated an audio wave 27 generated by the audio input 10 wherein the horizontal axis is time and the vertical axis is voltage. For illustrative purposes the wave 27 is shown as having a voltage peak 28 on the left part of FIG. 2 and a voltage peak 29 of the right side of FIG. 2. The voltage standard 16 of FIG. 1 generates a dc voltage designated at 31 in FIG. 2. This standard voltage is preferably at about 50% of the peak voltage 28. The comparator 14 of FIG. 1 actuates the FM capable generator 12 only when the positive envelope of the audio wave 27 exceeds the voltage standard. The negative portions of the audio wave are not utilized. Referring now to FIG. 3 there is illustrated two groups of bursts of microwave energy that are delivered by the antenna 22 of FIG. 1 to the head of the person 23. FIG. 3 has a horizontal time axis identical to the time axis of FIG. 2 and has a vertical axis that in this case represents the power of the microwaves from generator 19. At the left part of FIG. 3 are a plurality of microwave bursts 32 that occur on the time axis from the point of intersection of the standard voltage 31 with the positive part of the audio wave 27, designated as the time point 33 to time point 34 on FIG. 2. It will be noted in FIG. 3 that the bursts 32 are non-uniform in spacing and that they are closer together at the time of maximum audio voltage 28 and are more spread out toward the time points 33 and 34. This is the frequency modulation effected by the FM pulse generator 12. Referring to the right part of FIG. 3 there are a plurality of microwave bursts 36 that are fewer in number and over a shorter time period than the pulses 32. These extend on the time axis of FIG. 2 from point 37 to point 38. These bursts 36 are also frequency modulated with the closest groupings appearing opposite peak 29 of FIG. 2 and greater spacing near time points 37 and 38. Referring now to FIG. 4 there is illustrated the fact that a single burst shown as straight lines 32 or 36 on FIG. 3 are made up of ten to twenty separate microwave pulses. The duration of the burst is between 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds, with an optimum of 2 microseconds. The duration of each pulse within the burst is 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond and a time duration of 100 nanoseconds is preferred. The bursts 32 of FIG. 3 are spaced non-uniformly from each other caused by the frequency modulation of 12. FIG. 4 depicts a burst. Each vertical line 40 in FIG. 4 represents a single pulse. Each pulse is represented by the envelope 41 of FIG. 5. The pulses within a burst are spaced uniformly from eachother. The spacing between pulses may vary from 5 nanoseconds to 10 microseconds. Referring now to FIG. 3, the concentration of bursts 32 opposite the peak 28 of FIG. 2 can be expressed as a frequency of repetition. I presently prefer to adjust the FM capable generator 12 to have a maximum frequency of repetition in the range of 25 Khz to 100 Khz. I deliberately keep this range low to reduce the amount of heating caused by the microwaves. The wider spacing of the pulses 32 opposite the cutoff points 33 and 34 of FIG. 2 can also be expressed as a frequency of reptition and I presently prefer a minimum repetition rate of 1 KHz. I find that this low repetition rate, altnough in the audio range, does not disrupt the transmission of auoio intelligence to the person 23. The aim, again, is to reduce the amount of heat transmitted to the subject 23. OPERATION Referring to FIG. 1, the intelligence to be perceived by the person 23 is introduced at the audio source 10 which may be a microphone for voice, or a tape player for music, instruction, etc. This audio signal is transmitted to the FM capable generator 12 and to the comparator 14. The comparator 14 compares the positive portions of the audio wave with voltage from the voltage standard 16 and when the audio wave instantaneously exceeds the standard voltage, the FM generator is actuated by the wire 17 connecting the comparator 14 and the FM generator 12. The FM generator 12 then sends a plurality of signals to the microwave generator 19 at each peak of the audio wave above the voltage standard. This is shown graphically in FIGS. 2-5. The audio signal 27 of FIG. 2 exceeds the standard voltage 31 at point 33 whereupon the FM generator 12 starts emitting burst signals 32 at its lowest frequency of about 1 Khz. As time progresses past point 33 the voltage above the standard increases and the FM generator 12 responds by making the burst signals closer together until at peak 28 the maximum density of burst signals 32 is achieved, for example at a frequency of 50 Khz. The time duration of each pulse 40 (FIG. 4) is also controlled by a fixed adjustment of the FM generator 12 and for example the duration may be 100 nanoseconds. The frequency modulated burst signals are delivered by FM generator 12 to the microwave generator as interrupted dc and the microwave generator is turned on in response to each pulse 40 and its output is delivered by coaxial cable 21 to the parabolic antenna 22 to project microwaves onto the head of a person 23. These microwaves penetrate the brain enough so that the electrical activity inside of the brain produces the sensation of sound. When the parameters are adjusted for the particular individual, he perceives intelligible audio, entirely independently of his external hearlng organs. PRESENTLY PREFERRED QUANTITIES As mentioned previously, I prefer rhat the standard voltage 31 of FIG. 2 be about 50% of peak audio voltage. This not only helps to reduce heating in the person 2 but also reduces spurious audio. This 50% is not vital and the useful range is 25% to 85% of peak audio. The minimum burst repetition frequency (for example at time points 33 and 34) is preferably 1 KHz and the maximum repetition frequency is in the range of 25 KHz to 100 KHz, with the lower frequencies resulting in less heating. The time duration of each individual pulse of microwave radiation is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond as indicated in FIG. 5, with the shorter time periods resulting in less heating. CONTROL OF POWER OUTPUT As stated above, I maintain the power output of the parabolic antenna 22 within the present safe standard of 3.3 mw/cm2 (3.3 milliwatts per square centimeter). I control the power output by controlling the strengtn of the audio modulation. This results in a duty cycle of 0.005, the decimal measure of the time in any second that the transmitter is on full power. The peak power level can be between 500 mw and 5 w and at 0.005 duty cycle these peaks will result in an average power of 2.5 mw and 25 mw respectively. However, these values are further reduced by adjusting the audio modulation so that zero input produces a zero output. Since a voice signal, for example, is at maximum amplitude only a small fraction of the rime, the average power will be below the 3.3 mw/cm2 standard, even with 5 watts peak power. THEORY OF OPERATION I have not been able to experiment to determine how my microwave system works, but from my interpretation of prior work done in this field I believe that the process is as follows. Any group of bursts related to the audio ek 28 of FIG. 2 causes an increasing ultrasonic build up within the head of a human being starting with a low level for the first bursts pulses and building up to a high level with the last bursts pulses of a group. This buildup, I believe, causes the direct discharge of random brain neurons. These discharges at audio frequency create a perception of sound. This process, I believe, bypasses the normal hearing organs and can create sound in a person who is nerve-dead deaf. However, this theory of operation is only my guess and may prove to be in error in the future. APPARATUS The apparatus of FIG. 1 for carrying out my invention may include as a microwave generator Model PH40K of Applied Microwave Laboratories and described as Signal Source. The cable 21 connecting the microwave generator 19 and the antenna is RG8 coaxial cable by Belden Industries. The antenna 22 may be a standard parabolic antenna. The FM generator 12 has to be specially built to include the spacing runction which is obtained by a frequency generator built into a srandard FM generator. I have described my invention witn respect to a presently preferred embodiment as required by the patent statutes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the technology that many variations, modification and additions can be made. All such variations, modifications and additions that come within the true spirit and scope of the invention are included in the claims. http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL &p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='4877027'.WKU.&OS=PN /4877027&RS=PN/4877027 ( 1 of 1 ) http://rense.com/general37/skull.htm ASSOCIATED LINKS http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15200386 http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/114845.html http://www.electronictorture.com/