eValu

“No one is responsible for your happiness but you.” Will Smith

Beliefs become hardwired as our way of thinking. They become rigid absolutes. This is unhealthy for us.

Why is it one person believes one thing, a different person believes a different thing? The beliefs are software not absolutes. They are opinion, not truths. Humans commonly mistake beliefs for truths and act accordingly. They control our behaviour. 

So, if people are full up of nonsense but believe it, they behave like idiots. If people are full up of sense and believe it, they behave sane. 

To be sensitive is to be open and receptive to many different ideas, without necessarily having developed an ability to critically judge between fact and fantasy, right and wrong, good and bad, sense and nonsense, truth and delusions. Such people are vulnerable. 

In my 30+ years of counselling, I would say this includes most people to such an extent that the ones who are an exception of the rule are notable because they stand out. 

I put them into two categories, those who rigidly will not back down and yet are full of nonsense versus those who rigidly will not back down because they are aligned with the truth. 

You have to know truth to be able to recognise it in other people that’s a huge part of the problem, as soon as you accept and believe in and mistake a lie as a truth you are delusional. 

The ability to tell the difference between a lie in the truth begins with questioning everything instead of unquestioningly accepting information and mistaking it as truth, believing in it.

The second factor which helps to develop the ability to tell the difference between a lie in the truth is you’re never lie.

Again, the factor of delusion plays its part because unquestioningly believe in a thing to be true and acting accordingly, without identifying if it is true or not, undermines our ability to tell the truth.

—————

A simple board game. 

The board game grid is 11 squares by 11 squares. The game last for 10 rounds. You begin in the centre of the board at one edge. Opposite you is the finish line which is called the truth. To your left and you’re right are the sides of the game board which are called delusion. Every turn you move one step. If you have chosen to stay aligned with truth you move one step forward towards truth. Any other choice you move sideways instead of forwards. If, by the end of the game, you are still floating around somewhere in the board and have not cross the finish line and left the edge of the board, you are living in confusion and delusion.

In real life we do not have ten turns to assess the truth and align with it, we have one and it is continuous. Sadly, the vast majority of people are floating around in a sea of delusion, because they are not aligned to truth.  

—————

Any opinion is a belief not a truth. Therefore to mistake it for truth is delusional. Check your belief structure. Is your self doubt based on truth or delusion? If you identify that your self-doubt is based on delusion, reassess yourself. Say out loud: “I choose to no longer in power this delusion because it does not serve the truth.”

First step of this is to accept and this is very often the most difficult thing to do. 

“I accept that I was wrong up until this moment. As of now I go forward having consciously decided to align with truth.”

“I am not a piece of scum. I am worthy.”

“Everybody makes mistakes so we can learn from them, it does not make us bad people.”

I’m sure you have the imagination to invent whatever positive self talk is relevant to your circumstances.

—————

Because of this (above), it means anything anyone says is not immediately by default the truth. It is their opinion. Therefore it is probable that it is a delusion. 

If someone says (anything at all), do you:

a. Immediately be convinced it is the truth without questioning it?

b. Reject it as bullcrap?

c. Assess it to identify if it is truth or belief, if it is opinion, delusion, nonsense. 

d. Decide which, a b or c, is most relevant, depending on the circumstances. 

The ability to critically judge which category a thing is, is a life skill. 

The ability to reject anything which is not truth, is a life skill. 

Most people do not develop it very strong because most people are not trained to think clearly. 

People accept delusions and suffer the consequences. 

You don’t have to be delusional. You get to choose who you are, how you react to other people’s statements of opinion.

Quest For Relevance

The Quest for Relevance 

Through thousands of generations, throughout a multitude of different cultures, the Quest for Relevance has revealed to us an ineffable wisdom. 

The Purposeful Dialogue 

and Three Critical Questions 

1 : The Purposeful Dialogue

Our way of life is transitory. 

Everything we do is temporary, with exception of carving stone, planting trees and making children. Even then, there are no guarantees. 

People who do not carve stone, plant trees and/or make children are not part of the Human continuum. They’re part of the augmentation to provide for the continuum or they are vampires upon it. 

Most of the time most of us are not going to be carving stone, planting trees or making babies. 

2 : The Three Critical Questions 

Of all of the impermanent things it is possible for us to do: what is worth doing?

After great deliberation it was generally understood there to be one concept which answered this question: 

Satisfaction.

Emotional, Mental, Physical, Spiritual.

What activities accomplish this? 

After great deliberation it was necessarily asked: Is there anything at all outside of this which is worth doing? 

3 : The Fourth Awareness 

After great deliberation it was necessarily asked; is there any other thing not covered by these responses, which we have forgotten to be aware of? 

To date, despite various movements representing short-lived attempts to do so, there has been no solid reply to the fourth critical question (and very few to the third). 

Many claim it to be irrelevant. 

Many others agree that despite it being apparently unanswerable, the Dilemma of Unknowable Alternative is the most necessary and important of them all. 

Many others cannot distinguish the nature of any difference between the third and fourth. 

Many others explain it is imperative to understand the difference between the third and fourth. 

4 : A Promoted Discourse (insert)

A structured logical attempt to elucidate on the Critical Questions. 

“To aspire to higher things”

“Why?”

“For the sake of (it)” ‘it’ being in this case, higher things - for the sake of higher things.

“To bring you or others satisfaction.”

“Yes.”

“Aspiration is satisfaction.”

“Even if it is unobtainable or unobtained?”

“The quest for relevance includes the quest for satisfaction regardless of successful attainment.” 

“What of those who pursue unsatisfactory purpose? To not aspire. To aspire toward degradation.” 

“Are they relevant? Are they doing things worth doing?”

“Yes, Yes. Yes, No. No, Yes. No, No. These are the four castes of possible exemptions, those who pursue unsatisfactory purpose.

Yes, Yes. Relevant and Worthy. If they are relevant and worthy, they are not exempt. 

Yes, No. Relevant and Unworthy. If they are relevant they are also necessarily worthy. They are not exempt. The concept is self-defeating. It does not exist. It is delusional to establish grounding here. 

No, Yes. Irrelevant and Worthy. If they are worthy they are also necessarily relevant. They are not exempt. The concept is self-defeating. It does not exist. It is delusional to establish grounding here. 

No, No. Irrelevant and unworthy. This is the only group who answer the third critical question in a meaningful albeit negative way. Those who pursue activities which are neither relevant nor worthy do exist. Can their work be permanent? Can this lead us to answer the fourth question?”

“Answering each question either reveals it to have already been answered or that it creates more questions. It is a system which folds upon itself: ultimately all questions have already been answered, or they result in the same conclusion, a question which creates more questions, all of which have already been answered with the exception of the one question which creates more questions.”

“Have you come to a place in your approach where there are no longer any questions which have not already been answered, do not create more questions?”

“That place exists?”

“In many different guises. It is only the place where the question cannot be answered and requires more questions which is of concern to those who explore the third and fourth critical questions.”

3 Is there anything outside of satisfaction worth doing? 

4 Is there anything outside our rationale which we have overlooked?

“I do not enjoy the work I do.” 

“Does it creates results worth doing?”

“No. It is neither relevant nor worthy.”

“Then you are a fool to continue doing it.”

“That is why I must continue doing it. To discover relevance of irrelevancy. To answer the fourth critical question. That a person enacts an irrelevant and unworthy task, the futility, creates its own purpose, the purpose of its being.”

“You thus have aspiration. You have discovered satisfaction. It is relevant and worthy. You are not a fool.”

“Were I to cease to do it?” 

“That would be preferable.”

“Is there anything at all so futile as to be not contain this lesson of awareness? 

“That is why we ask these questions. That is their purpose. You have simply rephrased and therefore understood the third and fourth critical questions.”

“Were I to do nothing at all?”

“Only one who has succeeded at that can knowingly answer.”

5 : Concision (insert)

The Purposeful Dialogue

The Three Critical Questions 

The Dilemma Unknown

The Promoted Discourse

What is worth doing?

What activities accomplish this? 

Is there anything outside of this worth doing? 

Is there anything else to be aware of? 

Our task is to posit debate regarding the information presented as response to the Quest for Relevance. It is advised to tackle the topic one step at a time. It is also encouraged that any innovation on the individuals part be fully explored. 

6 : Undisclosed Evolution (insert)

Is it Useful?

Is it Accountable? 

Is it necessary for it to be (useful, accountable)? 

If it exists it serves purpose, it is relevant.

If it exists yet is unaccountable, it exists, it serves purpose. 

Are today’s interpretations what was originally intended? 

Do we suffer from cognitive bias? 

These questions are why the fourth critical question exists, to raise our awareness of such factors. 

All of these questions have already been integrated into the basic model. 

7 : The Golden Standard (insert)

“By what criteria do we ascertain Relevance?”

“That, respected and enlightened one, is the Golden Question.” 

“Does relevance necessarily have to be permanent? The answer is No, because we ourselves are not permanent. Only by our actions can we strive for permanence, by carving stone, planting trees or making children. This does not ipso facto mean we are ourselves irrelevant. Thus, those who do not carve stone, plant trees or make babies, are also not ipso facto irrelevant. Those are not the only criteria by which we evaluate relevancy. We also respect augmentation of the human continuum to have relevance.” 

“So the only irrelevant and unworthy caste are the vampiric who exploit the human continuum without augmenting it?”

“It is possible they also may have relevancy and worth, albeit relative. Relevancy is relative. It is about how we relate a thing to another. How we relate between things. Thus we must establish polarised or yet more complicated poly-optional parameters between things to establish weight worth.” 

“Who it is more useful to defines its respective worth. A lake owner requires water less than a desert nomad. To the lake owner water falls from the skies to fill his lake, water is everywhere, it is almost worthless. To the desert nomad water is rare and sacred, worth more than gold and perhaps more than life itself.” 

“We all need water.”

“Thus it has irrefutable worth. Do we all need gold?” 

“Most people never encounter it.”

“Are they any less for never encountering it?”

“No.”

“Then gold is worth significantly less than water.”

“Not to the owner of a gold mine in a desert.” 

“Now you see it. Worth is relative. Relevance is relative. Relativity is about relevancy. Revelation is elevation, it inherently has value.” 

“Insight and education.”

“Intuition and indoctrination.”

“Polarised parts of the same whole.”

“A dynamic. There is always a scale system between polarities, by which to gauge value. In its simplest form, five stages of transition. Pure left, bias left, perfect balance, bias right, pure right.”

“It could be left, centre, right.”

“We require versatility to assess complexity. Halfway between the oasis and the sea there is sand. Travel the opposite direction, halfway between the oasis and the sea there is sand. Without the sand there is no oasis, only a river connecting the left sea to the right sea.” 

These pages are inserts from the Tau of the SpaceWays, addendum & additional notes. 

Accountability Is Respectability

Timeline 1 - safe

At every moment, accountable humans consciously choose the optimal path for species survival and evolution. 

Timeline 2 - collapse

All people lost in the fallout of unaccountable people, collectively experiencing the horrors of planetary collapse, narcissistic destruction and death. 

Timeline 3 - toxicity 

Unaccountable people consciously creating the horrors of planetary collapse, narcissistic destruction and death, at every opportunity. 

The difference between these three possible Timelines has one factor: 

Accountability 

(including holding others accountable). 

Accountability for Self & self-action.

Accountability for safeguarding others.

Accountability for the environment. 

The environment, which supports us and provides us with life. (air, water, food, clothes, shelter, warmth). 

Accountability is Responsibility

Responsibility is Respectability 

FascistBook

Before it was taken over by fascism (prejudiced censorship, removal of freedom of speech human rights, extremist political agenda, etc) Facebook was for awhile a very good communication platform. 

Communication means connecting with people with whom we share a harmony. 

More often it means connecting with people who challenge us to develop because we nearly but not quite share a harmony. 

Much more often, especially if you use Facebook Groups, it means encountering internet trolls whose hate and aggression makes FB a negative experience for everyone. An arena of low-energy, bickering people attempting to drag each other down and discredit each other is unhealthy, it’s a sick pit. 

Finding the good people out there is like a needle in a haystack. Thankfully through interest-groups I’ve been fortunate to encounter a handful of such people with whom mutual support and information is shared and enjoyed. I’m grateful for that. 

As a result of being targeted by FascistBook for posting concern that non-scientific processes are rushing through a depopulation agenda using the WMD of vaccines which is a war crime, terrorism, acts against against humanity, I have decided to boycott Facebook for this specific reason.

“...depopulation through vaccinations, we aim to reduce the population by ten percent” Bill Gates 

Secondarily, FB actively protects abusive trolls and therefore is also an abuse network. When I report people for clearly making targeted attacks which is against FB terms and conditions, abusers working as admin for FB universally respond by saying they do not consider personal attacks to be breach of their T&C which specifically states personal attacks to be breach of T&C. 

By contrast I have been repeatedly banned from FB for posting statements of concern against injecting chemicals and which are defined as “biohazard” and aborted fetus DNA and similar carcinogenic toxins into people who then exhibit symptoms of Autism and other diseases. 

A part of this concern is the whitewash and stonewalling of literally thousands of people who attempt to report this exact thing, because it goes against the profit-margin of the pharmaceutical industry. 

This is not a conspiracy theory. Every step of the connection has been made and revealed by woke people such as myself who are therefore targets of the corporate agenda and the policies they act on despite international law and despite warnings from the elected president of the USA he will shut them down if they continue to repress people. 

FaceBook has continued to unlawfully repress people. Therefore it deserves to be shut down despite how useful it has been as a communication tool. 

Persecuted for being pro-science and pro-health and pro-common-sense by people rebranding that attitude as unwanted, anti-science and anti-health, so they can justify to themselves their fear-driven, for-profit agenda of the poisoning of a fear-driven population who are victims of their terrorism. 

Citation: ‘the Bill Gates depopulation through controlled pandemic and vaccine scam’.

I’m a survivor and I’m getting ahead of the curve, because that’s how survivors survive, by leaving FaceBook and taking my business and my energy elsewhere. 

So, to those handful of good people with whom I have connected in FaceBook; PM me your contact details if you have any interest in furthering a relationship. 

I’m going to be offline more often, growing veg, painting canvas, counselling trauma-abuse survivors, writing about socio-psychology, playing D&D and studying chi energy, acupressure and herbalism. Because that’s what I do. 

Peace ~ 

 

 

 

UPDATE 26.8.2020 

 

I went and did it. FB account deleted. It takes 90 days for them to complete the deletion, so it looks like I'll be heading into 2021 a free man.  

Step By Step

Among the primary reasons (plural) they are not evolving it’s because they cannot go beyond the ‘us versus them’, ‘win versus lose’ paradigm. 

To them, every exchange is an energy struggle which will result in either winning or losing. To their mind and mode, their way of being, everything is a competition. 

The concept of a win-win situation is the best way to get through to them that there is a mode of being more satisfactory than the aggression of constantly struggling to prove one’s supremacy above the other or failing to do so resulting in belief of inferiority. 

The attainment of win-win situations where everybody benefits as a standard procedure becomes a higher paradigm in which it is not necessary to identify and use language to reinforce winner versus loser. 

Seeking positive solutions necessitates adapting to this higher paradigm.

My astute student asked me whether an understanding of win-win paradigm is better or worse than an understanding of win versus lose paradigm. 

I asked my astute student whether I could use that as an illustration of the mentality of competition, of comparing one versus the other using what is necessarily a limited system of identifying criteria. 

Assumption And Abuse

Organised Crime includes Conspiracy. A group of people making an allegation about a target with zero evidence is not itself evidence. It is however defamation, persecution, potentially also trespass. All of which is abuse. 

One form of abuse with zero evidence is weighed against another form of abuse for which there is evidence. 

This system of analysis is regarded as credible. It is regarded as more credible than the alternative which is to compromise somewhere and ignore evidence while at the same time accepting hearsay in place of evidence. That system is called corruption. 

Yes, this does allow people to get away with crimes. 
It also establishes a precedent to reduce worse crimes. 
There is an honourable logic in that. 

It is not at all the same thing as defending people who have got away with crimes. 

It has nothing to do with gender bias and “patriarchal thinking”. It is simply use of logic and reason to evaluate an either/or situation to determine the most just and sensible system to be used. 

“Belief is not Knowing. If you Knew you would not Believe” - anonymous wisdom 

I can believe a person to be guilty of a crime but that does not mean I 100% know they did it. It means without questioning myself or the person making the allegation I will act as if a thing is true even though I do not know it to be true. The technical word for that is ‘delusional’. It’s a mistake to operate that way if your interest is in Truth.

Unfortunately a lot of people exploiting other people and situations for their own gain, be it financial or to fulfill a bitter need for vengeance, or to bask in the sickly glow of drama and involvement with vice, have very little interest in the actual Truth. 

what is BDSM

“Pardon the ignorance, but watta hell is BDSM?” anon

Bondage Discipline Deviation Domination Submission Sadism Masochism 

There are four primary and four secondary “roles” or “persona preferences” although  any school teaching only two (Dom and Sub) is immediately questionable as an excuse for abuse by people who don’t know what they’re doing and claim to be part of bdsm culture while debasing it. 

The four major are submissive dominant switch and brat. Switch can do either Sub or Dom depending on who they’re with and what the mood is. Brat is annoying attention-seeking attempting to convert their dom to a sub or their sub to a dom by undermining their authority, using anger reflex as a game to establish the partners breaking point and to encourage the partner to sexually abuse them violently which the brat believes they need for their own pleasure. It’s a different dynamic to a standard sub who is genuinely more submissive than a brat. 

The secondary four types are more rare and are more complicated, featuring a sub who wants to be a dom but isn’t/can’t, a dom who wants to be a sub but isn’t/can’t, a worse version of a brat who does not have normal social safety boundaries to limit their behaviour (which is what brats often attempt to become or at least appear to be) and a wider group called broken switch which doesn’t flow with the partner switch and causes glitches, hence the title glitch applied to them in some groups. 

My training in this is from experience and formal training from previous generations which were not dumbed down by the explosion of bdsm culture into public awareness and had to keep it more secret, long ago before the internet came along which assumes to have all the answers at the push of a button but generally doesn’t and is laughable with misinformation and lack of information. 

A good sub-dom relationship is about trust, and exploring oneself by shared activities in those roles - everything in it is about trust, and exploring the self and the other person. 

A bad sub-dom relationship is non-consensual and/or does not respect the need for trust at the heart of the relationship. 

Unfortunately the excuse for abuse which is assumed by abusers who latched onto bdsm as an arena to get away with it does put many people off the whole concept of exploring the many rituals involved. 

The exploration of pleasure mixed with pain to heighten sensory awareness and exploration of a lucid state of consciousness is intense and requires downtime as it can be exhausting. Care is always the keyword. The states explored of offering stability for inner trauma is preferable than the creation of trauma through misguided use of bdsm. 

It’s one of many facets of sexuality. Personally having been through a lot of bdsm culture I prefer the spiritual focus of tantric sensuality than what I find to be wild teenage fantasies for disfunctional adults. 

You will not find a more detailed overview of what bdsm culture is elsewhere in the internet nor from most practitioners you ever meet, than the words you have read here. 

These however are merely words. In my safe room you will not speak unless in simple honest direct answer to a question. The purity and intimacy of silence is a part of the methods I prefer and will reveal deeper and more passionately aspects of yourself not available during the distraction of human language structures. 

It most certainly is not simply “porn” although it can play it’s part. 

It’s a whole-lifestyle culture. 

The discipline aspect can involve for example diet for sexual health, exercise regime, many activities outside of the bedroom for the strengthening of the people individually and the relationship. For example visiting romantic locations and betterment of the individuals such as art galleries, museums, education, etc, to strengthen self discipline as a reflex with encouragement by the partner, new experiences for broadening perceptions and horizons, expanding the self. 

Knowing what you are doing is the domain of the dom. 

Trusting the dom to be caring even in any physical emotional and mental punishment necessary to instil a structured stability without it becoming excuse for abuse, is the domain of the yielding submissive who typically lacks self discipline and structure in their life. 

For many people bdsm means sexy lingerie, blindfolds, handcuffs and crappy spanking paddles from adult toy websites, vanilla and manila forms of kink.  

For some it involves more extreme experiences for instance kidnap and torture and other fetish fantasies, of which there is a vast range imaginable. 

BILL GATES IS NOSTRADAMUS ANTICHRIST

This poster might explain why March2020 has seen totalitarian removal of anything against the technocratic agenda of Bill Gates from youtube, facebook, &etc and the rebranding of truther posts based on hard science as 'fake news', the death of Freedom of Speech, under the guise of a global pandemic which has seen the death rate fall by 26000 people compared with the same time period two years ago.

COVID ORGANICS

Quote:

World Health Organisation (WHO) has refused to acknowledge the corona virus treatment from Madagascar because "a vaccine is very unlikely to come from Africa", numerous international media have reported.

Madagascar stunned the world last week when President Andry Rajoelina launched
the miracle "covid-organics" - a herbal tonic, that has helped the country subdue covid-19 and stamp its authority over a global pandemic that has made nonsense of the muscles of France, US, Italy, Spain, UK, & Iran, put together.

And in spite of normalcy returning to the island country, and schoolchildren resuming studies following a first of its kind plant-based tonic that's proven effective both in profilaxis, i.e. preventive and curative, WHO says a cure from an African address can't be trusted.

The herbal medicine developed by the country's Malagasy Institute of Applied Research (MIAR) contains Artemisia - a plant cultivated on the island and used in the fight against malaria.

Madagascar has a land mass of about 587,041sqkm and a population of around 27 million.

It reported its index cases on March 23 with 9 confirmed patients and by
April 19 had a total of 121 cases, 59 recoveries, and no deaths, as at April 24.

It’s been 5 days now and no new case has been recorded in the country. Yet WHO isn't convinced. Their only contention now is that the vaccine is locally made, and African. The argument is no longer whether it produces results.

But what exactly is Madagascar doing differently?

* Testing and contact tracing is devoid of politics.

* Schoolchildren receive compulsorily small doses of the tonic throughout the day, as they prepare to return to school, Wednesday.

* The plant-based tonic is also being distributed free to the most vulnerable in the country, and sold at very low prices to others.

* Wealthy and financially strong Madagascans, politicians, and legislators, purchase the tonic and make donations as their contribution towards funding more research.

* BBC reports scores of locals trooping out to receive the tonic, as no lockdown is in place.

* The country hasn't welcome any "outside" assistance.

* Their lab scientists, medicine professors, consultants and doctors converged in labs working their socks out, while their counterparts in the rest Africa were dressed in 3-piece suits, tuxedos and pyjamas, drinking choice wines, turning on swivel chairs, watching TV and ordering that as few tests as possible be conducted, so as not to paint their regions black and shame their emperors!

* Scientists in the country presented their finding to their President who happily went on national TV and took doses of the syrup, discovered, processed, made and bottled from their research labs.

* All proceeds from sales of the medicine is to be pushed back into their science research institutes.

Make no mistake!

As long as a covid19 vaccine isn't found in the so-called saner climes, WHO may well not okay it! Take it or leave it.

I'm not a scientist, but whatever is in those Madagascan bottles, even if it cures a million people a day, won't make sense to WHO, because its African, local and black!

Simplicitas.

As usual, they want the patent, franchise, and proprietary to be domiciled in some Western address - America, UK, Canada, Israel, Norway and even Latin America. Name them.

Don't be deceived! Those guys had already written us off! Long ago. With over 2000 dropping dead daily in the US alone, Melinda Gates could only see dead bodies lining the streets of Africa. It's foolishness.

But that mentality isn't new!

What bothers me, though, is why African leaders seem to be giving their imprimatur to her doomsday hallucinations. Rubber stamps, if you ask me!

You doubt, abi!

Ok, why are African heads still yet to rally round Madagascar and give this therapy a global shot? Tell me!

The West sure have an agenda, but that agenda can't work without our culpable consent!

Africa, please it's time to arise! We fought and won the war against the dreaded Ebola. WHO did not give us any credits and we didn't mind!

We will win again, even against covid19. Collectively and in unity.

Wilcox James

Kindly Like Or Follow The Page Now For Your News Updates.

NOW GOOGLE SEARCH FOR "COVID ORGANICS" 

Moorcock Quote

"If I set a story on the island, I'd learn a little bit about the island. But just enough to tell the story. As it is I tend to take my stories from the places I've been, but "world-making" as a pastime is meaningless to me. I know that there are people out there who do this all the time, but it sort of stops you in your tracks, because all you're doing is building a world, you're not navigating that world. I find that very peculiar. All of these are assumptions made by people who've come out of the genre itself: Dungeons and Dragons, everything that's come since me. Most of that stuff is fairly strange to me. Younger readers will complain that my books are all right, but I don't go into enough detail, the way all these other writers do. Now as far as I'm concerned, those writers are boring farts. They're wasting my time and killing a tree to boot. That stuff I just skip automatically.​" Michael Moorcock